disconnection. Judicious choice of protecting groups that are
labile under neutral or only slightly basic conditions should
enable us to carry out the final deprotection step and therefore
bring cristatic acid into reach. Summarized below is the
successful reduction of these ideas to practice.
Our approach starts from methyl orsellinate 2 which is
easily accessible on a large scale in one-pot from methyl
acetoacetate (Scheme 1).5 The voluminous precipitate formed
Allylic oxidation of 4 thus formed with SeO2 and tert-
BuOOH delivers the required allylic alcohol 5 in good yield.
An X-ray analysis of its deprotected form 6 was carried out
which confirmed the attachment of the prenyl side chain at
the C-3 position of the orsellinic acid and the (E)-configu-
ration of the trisubstituted double bond (Figure 2).11 Alcohol
Scheme 1a
Figure 2. ORTEP diagram of the molecular structure of compound
6. Anisotropic displacement parameter ellipsoids are drawn at 50%
probability; hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. For details, see
the Supporting Information. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles
(deg): O25-C25 1.4464(6), C25-C23 1.5083(18), C23-C22
1.3332(19), C22-C21 1.5077(18), C21-C2 1.5160(17), C61-O61
1.2188(18), C3-C2-C21 122.77(12), C23-C22-C21 127.30(12),
C22-C23-C25 119.43(12), O61-C61-O62 120.52(12).
5 was finally converted into allyl bromide 7 on treatment
with mesyl chloride and LiBr in a mixed solvent system.
a (a) NaH, prenyl bromide, toluene, 35 °C, 19h, 73%; (b) SEMCl,
KH, 18-crown-6 cat., THF, 5 h, rt, 84%; (c) SeO2, t-BuOOH (70%
in water), CH2Cl2, 5 h, rt, 61%; (d) MeSO2Cl, LiBr, Et3N, CH2Cl2/
THF, 0 °C, 3 h, 76%.
The second fragment required for the assembly of cristatic
acid was prepared from the functionalized sulfonium salt 8
which had previously been used in our laboratory as a
versatile building block for the synthesis of heterocyclic
natural products of different complexity.12,13 Deprotonation
with tert-BuLi at low temperature and reaction of the
resulting sulfur ylide with 2-(4-methoxybenzyl)oxyacetal-
dehyde 914 affords epoxide 10 in 62% yield (Scheme 2).
Treatment of this compound with catalytic amounts of Pd-
(PPh3)4 and dppe selectively activates its vinyloxirane
entity.15 The resulting alkoxide deprotonates admixed bis-
(phenylsulfonyl)methane which then attacks the π-allyl
upon deprotonation of 2 with NaH in toluene reacts with
prenyl bromide at 35 °C to afford compound 3 in 73% yield,
which itself is a natural product isolated from the Japanese
mushroom Polyporus dispansus (“komori-take”).6 The excel-
lent selectivity in favor of alkylation at the C-3 position rather
than the three other possible sites (C-5, O-2, O-4) in substrate
2 is remarkable. In line with the well-understood reactivity
pattern of ambident nucleophiles,7 the formation of the
sodium salt of 2 is essential for this favorable outcome,
whereas the corresponding potassium salt previously used
in a similar context turned out to be much less appropriate.2
Compound 3 was then converted into the bis(2-trimeth-
ylsilylethoxy)methyl (SEM) ether 4.8,9 This particular pro-
tecting group was chosen in light of previous successful
applications to studies on farnesyl phenol derivatives in
which the final deprotections were similarly crucial.3,10
(10) Saimoto, H.; Kusano, Y.; Hiyama, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27,
1607.
(11) For details see the Supporting Information.
(12) Furans: (a) Fu¨rstner, A.; Gastner, T.; Rust, J. Synlett 1999, 29. (b)
Fu¨rstner, A.; Guth, O.; Rumbo, A.; Seidel, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 11108. (c) Fu¨rstner, A. Synlett 1999, 1523.
(13) Pyrroles: (a) Fu¨rstner, A.; Weintritt, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 2817. (b) Fu¨rstner, A.; Weintritt, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
2944. (c) Fu¨rstner, A.; Gastner, T.; Weintritt, H. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64,
2361. (d) Fu¨rstner, A.; Krause, H. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 8281.
(14) Prepared by alkylation of 2-butene-1,4-diol with p-MeOC6H4CH2-
Cl in the presence of NaH (DMF, n-Bu4NI cat., rt, 77%) and cleavage of
the resulting product with OsO4 cat./NaIO4 (pyridine/Et2O/H2O, rt, 77%)
in analogy to a procedure described in: Garner, P.; Park, J. M. Synth.
Commun. 1987, 17, 189.
(15) For leading references on Pd(0)-catalyzed reactions of vinyloxiranes,
see: (a) Tsuji, J.; Kataoka, H.; Kobayashi, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22,
2575. (b) Trost, B. M.; Molander, G. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103,
5969. (c) Trost, B. M.; Warner, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 5940.
(d) Review: Tsuji, J. Palladium Reagents and Catalysts; Wiley: New York,
1995.
(5) Barrett, A. G. M.; Morris, T. M.; Barton, D. H. R. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1980, 2272. See also the Supporting Information for a
multigram synthesis of this compound.
(6) Ishii, N.; Takahashi, A.; Kusano, G.; Nozoe, S. Chem. Pharm. Bull.
1988, 36, 2918.
(7) (a) Le Noble, W. J. Synthesis 1970, 1. (b) Gompper, R. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1964, 3, 560.
(8) Lipshutz, B. H.; Pegram, J. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 3343.
(9) Silyl ethers instead of SEM groups were ruled out for the reason
given in ref 19.
2468
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 16, 2000