K. L. Weiss et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 11 (2001) 1583–1586
1585
tumor activity in this model. In fact, compared to the
control group, each treatment group had a significantly
steep decline in tumor volume (all p values <0.05).
During the course of this experiment, the diet that had
been held for a maximum of 7 days in the animal room
was extracted and analyzed by HPLC and showed no
evidence of retinoid isomerization or decomposition
(93% trans at start; 92% trans atday 7).
resulting from displacement of vitamin A (retinol) from
its serum retinol binding protein (RBP),16 thereby
minimizing retinol delivery to the eye. As shown in
Figure 1, there is much less of a reduction in plasma
retinol concentration in animals fed 4-HBR when com-
pared to 4-HPR and RA.17 Although 4-HBR appears to
compete as effectively as 4-HPR for [3H]-retinol binding
to RBP (Fig. 2), 4-HBR may cause less effect on plasma
retinol levels in vivo because it achieves a lower con-
centration in the circulation than does 4-HPR (Fig. 1b).
Previously, we have found that the body weight of ani-
mals eating retinoid-containing diets reflects retinoid
toxicity4 as does liver weight(unpublished resuslt).
While we found no difference in the liver weights among
the treatment groups (data not shown), the body
weights of the RA and 4-HPR-fed groups showed a
substantial (5–6%) decline compared to the virtually
unaffected 4-HBR and control-fed groups. This indi-
cates that 4-HBR does not demonstrate any untoward
toxicity at this dose and duration of feeding. Of perhaps
greater importance, one of the major toxicities asso-
ciated with 4-HPR therapy in humans is night blindness
Finally, in preliminary studies, 4-HBR has been found
to bind poorly to RARs a, b, and g, with an affinity
similar to that of 4-HPR (for example, Ki’s of 4-HBR,
4-HPR, and RA for RARg are >4000, >4000, and
0.7 nM, respectively). In conclusion, 4-HBR appears to
share many of the biological properties of 4-HPR,
including its effectiveness as an antitumor agent. How-
ever, 4-HBR may have a significantadvanatge over
4-HPR since the nonhydrolyzable analogue causes a
much reduced decline in serum retinol concentration
which may lessen the risk of developing night blindness
at therapeutic doses. Details of the chemistry, biochem-
istry, and biological activity of 4-HBR will be reported
in due course as further studies are conducted.
Acknowledgements
Financial supportin hte form of a grant(CA49837)
from the National Cancer Institute is gratefully
acknowledged.
References and Notes
1. Moon, R. C.; Thompson, H. J.; Becci, P. J.; Grubb, C. J.;
Gander, R. J.; Newton, D. L.; Smith, J. M.; Phillips, S. L.;
Henderson, W. R.; Mullen, L. T.; Brown, C. C.; Sporn, M. B.
Cancer Res. 1979, 39, 1339.
2. Kenel, M. F.; Krayer, J. H.; Merz, E. A.; Pritchard, J. F.
Teratog. Carcinog. Mutag. 1988, 8, 1.
3. Veronesi, U.; DePalo, G.; Marubini, E.; Costa, A.; For-
melli, F.; Mariani, L.; Decensi, A.; Camerini, T.; Rosselli Del
Turco, M.; Gaetana Di Mauro, M.; Grazia Muraca, M.; Del
Vecchio, M.; Pinto, C.; D’Aiuto, G.; Boni, C.; Campa, T.;
Magni, A.; Miceli, R.; Perloff, M.; Malone, W. F.; Sporn,
M. B. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1999, 91, 1847.
4. Abou-Issa, H.; Curley, R. W., Jr.; Panigot, M. J.; Tanagho,
S. N.; Sidhu, B. S.; Alshafie, G. A. Anticancer Res. 1997, 17,
3335.
5. Chambon, P. A. FASEB J. 1996, 10, 940.
6. Fanjul, A. N.; Delia, D.; Pierotti, M. A.; Rideout, D.; Ya,
J.-Q.; Pfahl, M. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 22441.
7. Abou-Issa, H. M.; Alshafie, G. A.; Curley, R. W., Jr.;
Wong, M. F.; Clagett-Dame, M.; Repa, J. J.; Sikri, V. Antic-
ancer Res. 1999, 19, 999.
8. Sheikh, M. S.; Shao, Z.-M.; Li, X.-S.; Ordonez, T.; Niles,
R. M.; Fontana, J. A. Carcinogenesis 1995, 16, 2477.
9. Delia, D.; Aiello, A.; Lombardi, L.; Pelicci, P. G.;
Grignani, F.; Formelli, F.; Menard, S.; Costa, A.; Veronesi,
U.; Pierotti, M. A. Cancer Res. 1993, 53, 6036.
Figure 2. Sedimentation analysis of RBP binding to all-trans-[3H]-
retinol (250 nM; 4.7 Ci/mmol) in the absence and presence of
unlabeled retinoid. RBP-containing samples were incubated with
ligands on ice for 3 h, treated with dextran-coated charcoal and ana-
lyzed on 4–20% sucrose gradients.
10. Clifford, J. L.; Menter, D. G.; Wang, M.; Lotan, R.;
Lippman, S. M. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 14.