A. Mohammadi et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 89 (2012) 238–242
239
HO
OH
OH HO
OH
CH3 CH3
N
CH3
H
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
N
C
N
C
N
C
C
CH3
O
CH3
O
CH3
O
CH3
O
CH3
Dye 1
Dye 2
Dye 3
Dye 4
Dye 5
Scheme 1. The chemical structure of synthesized azo dyes.
obtained on a FT-NMR (500 MHz) Brucker apparatus spectrome-
ter, and the chemical shifts are expressed in ı ppm using TMS as
an internal standard. The visible spectra were measured using a
Pharmacia Biotech Spectrophotometer.
2.2.3. 1-(4-(4-(Diethylamino)phenylazo)phenyl)ethanone (dye 3)
Red dye with metallic luster was recrystallized from DMF/H2O
and obtained in a yield of 85%.
Mp: 159–161 ◦C. UV–vis (EtOH), ꢁmax (nm) 461. IR (KBr): ꢂ
2880–2980 (Aro. H), 1502(N N). 1H NMR (CDCl3) 1.26 (t, 6H, CH3,
2.2. Synthesis and characterization
J = 7.1 Hz), 2.5 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.48 (q, 4H,
N CH2, J = 7.11 Hz), 6.72
(d, 2H, Aro. H, J = 9.26 Hz), 7.9 (d, 2H, Aro. H, J = 9.26 Hz), 7.96–8.0
(m, 4H, Aro. H). Elemental analysis calcd for C18H21N3O: C 73.08%,
H 7.09%, N 14.41%. Found: C 73.19%, H 7.17%, N 14.23%.
The mixtures of aniline derivatives (3 mmol), water (5 mL) and
concentrated sulfuric acid (7.5–9 mmol) were heated with stirring
until a clear solution was obtained. These solutions were cooled to
0–4 ◦C and a solution of sodium nitrite (0.207 g, 3 mmol) in water
was added drop wise while the temperature was maintained below
4 ◦C. The resulting mixtures were stirred for 45–60 min in an ice
bath. After diazotization was complete, the azo liquor was slowly
added to a stirred solution of aromatic amines (3 mmol) dissolved
in 10 mL of buffer solution of acetic acid–acetate sodium (pH = 5)
and 2–5 mL ethanol. The resulting mixture was stirred at 0–4 ◦C for
2 h in an ice bath. After this stage, the pH of the reaction mixture
was maintained at 6.5–7.5 by addition of acetate sodium solution.
Then the resulting dyes were filtered and washed with cold water.
The crude dyes were purified using recrystallization method with
EtOH and DMF/H2O. The physical and spectral data of the purified
dyes are as follows.
2.2.4. 1-(4-(4-(N-benzyl-N-ethylamino)phenylazo)phenyl)
ethanone (dye 4)
Red dye with metallic luster was recrystallized from DMF/H2O
and obtained in a yield of 85%.
Mp: 116–118 ◦C. UV–vis (EtOH), ꢁmax (nm) 447. IR (KBr): ꢂ
2875–2990 (Aro. H), 1510 (N N). 1H NMR (CDCl3) 1.3 (t, 3H, CH3,
J = 7.12 Hz), 3.6 (q, 2H,
N CH2, J = 7.12 Hz), 4.2 (s, 2H, CH2), 6.7
(d, 2H, J = 9.1 Hz, Aro. H), 7.2 (d, 2H, J = 9.1 Hz, Aro. H), 7.3 (d, 2H,
J = 8.8 Hz, Aro. H), 7.7 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, Aro. H). Elemental analysis
calcd for C23H23N3O: C 77.32%, H 6.75%, N 11.82%. Found: C 77.28%,
H 6.49%, N 11.76%.
2.2.5. 2,2ꢀ-(4-(4-Methoxyphenylazo)phenylamino)diethanol (dye
5)
Golden dye with metallic luster was recrystallized from EtOH
and obtained in a yield of 94%.
2.2.1. 2-(4-(4-Acetylphenylazo)phenylamino)ethanol (dye 1)
Orange dye was recrystallized from EtOH and obtained in a yield
of 90%.
Mp: 135–137 ◦C. UV–vis (EtOH), ꢁmax (nm) 409. IR (KBr): ꢂ 3445
(OH), 2960 (Aro. H), 1504 (N N) cm−1 1H NMR (CDCl3) ı 3.23 (br,
.
Mp: 126–128 ◦C. UV–vis (EtOH), ꢁmax (nm) 368. IR (KBr): ꢂ
3310–3450 (br, OH and NH, overlapped), 1495 (N N) cm−1 1H
.
2H, OH), 3.72 (t, 4H, N–CH2, J = 4.74 Hz), 3.91 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.96 (t,
4H, O–CH2, J = 4.88 Hz), 6.79 (m, 2H, Aro. H), 7.03 (m, 2H, Aro. H),
7.87 (m, 4H, Aro. H). Elemental analysis calcd for C17H21N3O3: C
64.32%, H 7.1%, N 13.63%. Found: C 64.74%, H 6.71%, N 13.32%.
NMR (DMSO-d6) ı 2.4 (1H, t, J = 5.3 Hz, OH), 2.47 (3H, s, CH3), 3.8
(2H, q, J = 5.4 Hz, OCH2), 4.3 (2H, t, J = 5.3 Hz, NCH2), 4.6 (1H, br, s,
NH), 6.9 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, Aro. H), 7.94 (2H, d, J = 8.9 Hz, Aro. H),
7.96 (2H, d, J = 8.9 Hz, Aro. H), 8.1 (2H, d, J = 8.9 Hz, Aro. H). Ele-
mental analysis calcd for C16H17N3O2: C 67.64%, H 6.22%, N 15.23%.
Found: C 67.83%, H 6.05%, N 14.83%.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. The UV–visible spectra and solvatochromic studies of
synthesized dyes
2.2.2. 2,2ꢀ-(4-(4-Acetylphenylazo)phenylamino)diethanol (dye 2)
Orange-red dye with metallic luster was recrystallized from
EtOH and obtained in a yield of 94%.
In order to study of solvent effects on spectral features of the
different polarity at a concentration of 10−5–10−6 M in the range
of 300–700 nm (Table 1), in which the solvents are arranged in
the order of increasing polarity. Also, refractive index (n), dielec-
tric constant (ε) and the solvatochromic parameters (ꢀ*, ˛, and ˇ)
were taken from the literature [22–24]. As shown in Table 1, the
electronic absorption spectra of all studied compounds in different
Mp: 156–158 ◦C. UV–vis (EtOH), ꢁmax (nm) 449. IR (KBr): ꢂ 3280
(br, OH), 1660 (
C .
O), 1510 (N N) cm−1 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) ı
2.51 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.56 (t, 4H, N–CH2, J = 4.99 Hz), 3.73 (q, 4H, O CH2,
J = 5.19 Hz), 4.59 (t, 2H, OH, J = 5.34 Hz), 6.70 (m, 2H, Aro. H), 7.74
(m, 4H, Aro. H), 7.92 (m, 2H, Aro. H). Elemental analysis calcd for
C18H21N3O3: C 65.82%, H 6.75%, N 14.8%. Found: C 66.04%, H 6.47%,
N 12.84%.