Continuous flow ligand-free heck reactions using monolithic Pd [0] nanoparticles

Article abstract of DOI:10.1021/op7000436

An automated reactor has been developed for performing ligand-free Heck reactions in continuous flow mode. The reactor utilises a monolithic reactor cartridge derivatised with Pd(0) nanoparticles in-line with a scavenging cartridge containing Quadrapure-T

Full text of DOI:10.1021/op7000436

Organic Process Research & Development 2007, 11, 458−462
Continuous Flow Ligand-Free Heck Reactions Using Monolithic Pd [0]
Nanoparticles
Nikzad Nikbin, Mark Ladlow, and Steven V. Ley*
Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK
Table 1. Optimal composition of polymerisation mixture
(v/v) used to prepare basic macroporous organic monolithic
columns
Abstract:
An automated reactor has been developed for performing
ligand-free Heck reactions in continuous flow mode. The reactor
utilises a monolithic reactor cartridge derivatised with Pd(0)
nanoparticles in-line with a scavenging cartridge containing
Quadrapure-TU to efficiently capture palladium residues and
thereby afford Heck products directly in high purity.
vinyl benzyl
chloride
divinyl
benzene
1-dodecanol
45%
AIBN
1%
temp
35%
20%
80 °C
Immobilised catalysts and reagents1 have proven to be
very useful in parallel synthesis applications, especially
within the pharmaceutical industry. Heterogeneous catalysts
are attractive for both laboratory scale and larger industrial
processing, and the application of such supported catalysts/
reagents in continuous flow mode offers advantages in terms
of ease of automation, safety, and reproducibility.2 More-
over, optimally, no purification steps are needed and flow
reactors can be used repeatedly, thus bringing down produc-
tion costs.
Supported reagents prepared from insoluble gel-type
polystyrene-based polymers are most commonly used in
conventional batch processes. These materials, usually in the
form of beads, can be adapted for use in flow processes by
simply packing them into column or tube arrangements.
However, these randomly packed columns can be problem-
atic, largely because they suffer from poorly controlled fluid
dynamics.3 These problems typically include mass and heat
transfer limitations and less-than-efficient surface area
exposure and utilisation. Moreover, compression of these
polymers under pressure can tend to block the flow system,
and alternatively differential swelling of microporous poly-
styrene beads upon exposure to different solvents may lead
to changes in column dimensions and packing that can result
in detrimental “channeling” or bypassing of the particles.
Macroporous beads offer a preferential arrangement whereby
a high degree of cross-linking ensures that the geometry of
the reactor, and thereby porosity, is maintained irrespective
of the solvent being used. However, although macroporous
reactor columns rarely suffer from blockages attributable to
compaction, access to active sites within the beads may be
diffusion limited and compromised by convective flow
around the beads (even an ideally packed column of
monodisperse beads has a void volume of approximately
27%4). Moreover the production of uniformly sized beads
Figure 1. SEM picture of the macroporous polymer before
immobilisation of Pd.
by a suspension polymerisation process can be difficult, and
extensive sieving is often necessary to produce a monodis-
perse bead size.
Many of these drawbacks can be overcome by using
functionalised monolithic materials as the basis for continu-
ous flow reactor columns.5 In this context, monoliths are a
single continuous piece of porous material which can be
made from either inorganic6 or organic material.7 Organic
monoliths can be made of a variety of different polymers
using different polymerisation methods to induce pores
within a controlled range. Optimally, a monolithic material
provides a high surface area, short diffusion paths, effective
mass transfer under convective flow,8 and comparatively low
back pressures characteristic of high porosity.
Transition metal nanoparticles have attracted a great deal
of attention in wide-ranging disciplines, although applications
in catalysis remain preeminent.9 These particles are typically
1-100 nm in diameter and show size-dependent properties.
Their interesting catalytic properties can be attributed to a
higher percentage of atoms expressed on the reacting surface,
and nanoparticular catalysts have shown interesting results
(4) Svec, F.; Frechet, J. M. J. Science 1996, 273, 205-211.
(5) Svec, F.; Frechet, J. M. J. Chem. Mater. 1995, 7, 707-715.
(6) Heck, R. M.; Gulati, S.; Farratu, R. J. Chem. Eng. J. 2001, 82, 149-156.
(7) Barby, D.; Haq, Z. Eur. Pat. 0060138, 1982.
(8) Kunz, U.; Kirschning, A.; Wen, H.-L.; Solodenko, W.; Cecilia, R.; Kappe,
C. O.; Turek, T. Catal. Today 2005, 105, 318-324.
(9) Roucoux, A.; Schulz, J.; Patin, H. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 3757-3778.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: svl1000@cam.ac.uk.
(1) Ley, S. V.; Baxendale, I. R.; Bream, R. N.; Jackson, P. S.; Leach, A. G.;
Longbottom, D. A.; Nesi, M.; Scott, J. S.; Storer, R. I.; Taylor, S. J. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 2000, 23, 3815-4195.
(2) Jas, G.; Kirschning, A. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 5708-5723.
(3) Stankiewicz, A. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2001, 56, 359-361.
458
•
Vol. 11, No. 3, 2007 / Organic Process Research & Development
10.1021/op7000436 CCC: $37.00 © 2007 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 04/07/2007

Figure 2. (a) TEM image of a nanoparticular Pd derivatised monolith (40k). (b) HRTEM image of a Pd nanoparticle showing an
ordered lattice structure (800k). (c) EDS spectrum of a nanoparticle showing only Pd(0) to be present.
Figure 3. Flow-through reactor setup.
in a variety of reactions, in particular C-C coupling
processes. One of the most versatile of these metal-catalysed
C-C bond forming reactions is the Heck reaction.10 Several
groups have used Pd nanoparticles to perform Heck cross-
coupling.11,12 Recently, Kirschning et al. reported the prepa-
ration of Pd nanoparticles dispersed inside a composite glass/
polymer monolith.13 Amongst other useful Pd catalysed
reactions, their article described one example of a Heck
reaction using this composite reactor.
Herein we report the development of a rigid macroporous
organic monolith, of the type first described by Frechet and
Svec,4 which we have derivatised with Pd nanoparticles and
used to perform Heck cross-coupling reactions as part of an
automated flow-through reactor system. We believe that
organic monoliths of this type are well-suited for use in flow-
through polymer assisted synthesis. Usually, they benefit
from a higher loading than polymers prepared by suspension
polymerisation due to the fact that polymerisation happens
only in one phase and the problem of partitioning does not
arise. Moreover, they can be readily and reproducibly
prepared in a wide range of sizes suitable for micro- and
mesoflow applications.14-16
Results and Discussion
Preparation of Monolithic Supported Pd(0) Nanopar-
ticles. A. Preparation of Macroporous Organic Mono-
lithic Reactor Columns (Quaternary Ammonium Form).
The physical characteristics of macroporous organic mono-
liths are dependent upon composition, the nature of the
porogen used, and the conditions used to promote polymeri-
sation. Therefore, considerable preliminary experimentation
was performed with the objective of identifying a rigid
monolithic polymer that could be reproducibly prepared with
both high porosity to reduce backpressure experienced in a
flowing system and the ability to be stably derivatised with
Pd nanoparticles such that the column reactor could be reused
for a range of substrates before regeneration became neces-
sary. All polymerisation experiments were performed under
1 bar of pressure in situ within 6.6 mm id × 70 mm glass
columns17 which were temporarily sealed at one end and
located within a multichannel convective heating device18
to enable polymerisation to be induced thermally in the
presence of AIBN as the radical initiator. In this way,
polymerisation of the mixture given in Table 1 at 80 °C for
20 h, followed by washing with THF (1.0 mL/min; rt; 2h)
to remove the porogen and residual nonpolymeric material,
(10) Heck, R. F.; Nolley, J. J. Org. Chem. 1972, 1133-1136.
(11) Beller, M.; Fischer, H.; Kuhlein, K.; Reisinger, C.-P.; Hermann, W. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1996, 520, 257-260.
(12) Reetz, M. T.; Lohmer, G. Chem. Commun. 1996, 1921-1922.
(13) Solodenko, W.; Wen, H.-L.; Leue, S.; Stuhlmann, F.; Sourkouni-Argirusi,
G.; Jas, G.; Schonfeld, H.; Kunz, U.; Kirschning, A. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2004, 3601-3610.
(15) Baxendale, I. R.; Deely, J.; Griffith-Jones, C. M.; Ley, S. V.; Saaby, S.;
Tranmer, G. K. Chem. Commun. 2006, 2566-2568.
(16) Jo¨nsson, D.; Warrington, B. H.; Ladlow, M. J. Comb. Chem. 2004, 6, 584-
595.
(17) Omnifit Ltd., 2 College Park, Coldhams Lane, Cambridge, UK CB1 3HD.
Website: http://www.omnifit.com.
(14) Baxendale, I. R.; Griffith-Jones, C. M.; Ley, S. V.; Tranmer, G. K. Synlett
2006, 427-430.
(18) The R-4 Flow Reactor module is available from Vapourtec Ltd., Place Farm,
Ingham, Suffolk, UK 1P31 1NQ. http://www.vapourtec.com.
Vol. 11, No. 3, 2007 / Organic Process Research & Development
•
459

Table 2. Cross-coupling reactions between selected aryl halides and alkenes
gave a rigid white monolith that completely filled the glass
column (Figure 1). Mercury intrusion analysis established
the median pore size to be 3147 nm, and the surface area
was determined to be 4.93 m2/g using nitrogen absorption
and BET theory. Other formulations having potentially higher
surface areas lacked the physical robustness and overall
viability of this combination for the application in hand.
The monolith was converted to the quaternary ammonium
form by elution with a solution of triethylamine in toluene
(1:4) at 0.04 mL/min and 60 °C for 48 h which was then
washed with toluene at 1.0 mL/min for 30 min at 60 °C to
afford a loading of 2.0 mmol/g, according to C, H, and N
analysis.
mmol) in water (80 mL; dark brown) was pumped through
the monolith at 0.3 mL/min. Initially, a clear solution exited
from the column which, on removal of water, was found to
contain only sodium chloride. After about 3 h (equivalent
to pumping through approximately 1.0 mmol of sodium
palladate), the outflow turned yellow. This procedure was
repeated using a freshly prepared solution of sodium tetra-
chloropalladate before the monolith was washed with water
(20 mL) at 1.0 mL/min. An aqueous solution of sodium
borohydride (625 mg in 50 mL water) was pumped through
the column at 0.5 mL/min whereupon the previously white
monolith immediately turned black. Finally, the column was
conditioned by flushing with water (20 mL), then 1.0 M HCl
(20 mL), water (30 mL), and ethanol (20 mL), all at 1.0
mL/min. Imaging of a representative monolith by HRTEM
B. Preparation of Palladium(0) Derivatised Monolith:
A solution of sodium tetrachloropalladate (465 mg, 1.6
460
•
Vol. 11, No. 3, 2007 / Organic Process Research & Development

Scheme 1. Heck coupling in superheated ethanol
Table 3. Results of Heck cross-coupling reaction in superheated ethanol
clearly showed the presence of Pd nanoparticles attached to
the polystyrene support in the size range 5-50 nM (Figure
2a). Closer examination of the Pd particles revealed an
ordered lattice arrangement (Figure 2b) which remained
stable over an extended period of time. EDS analysis
confirmed that only Pd(0) was present (Figure 2c).
Pd Catalysed Ligand-Free Heck Reaction. A variety
of aryl halides and alkenes were used to examine the
effectiveness of the monolithic reactor to promote the Heck
cross-coupling reaction in DMF in the presence of triethyl-
amine. In each reaction, an aryl halide (0.2 mmol), an alkene
(0.3 mmol), and triethylamine (0.3 mmol) were dissolved
in DMF (1.0 mL), and this mixture was introduced onto the
monolithic nanoparticular Pd reactor column using either
manual loop injection or an automated injection module19
with DMF as the system solvent pumped at 0.05 mL/min
throughout (Figure 3). The reactor column was maintained
at 130 °C using a convective heating device. The output
from the flow reactor was collected for 2.0 h, either man-
ually or by automated fraction collection, and then the sol-
vent was evaporated under high vacuum and the residue
dissolved in dichloromethane and was washed with water.
Removal of the dichloromethane afforded the isolated
products which were characterised by LC-MS and NMR
analysis (Table 2).
An attractive advantage of flow reactors resides in the
ability to readily perform chemistries above atmospheric
pressure. DMF is both toxic and difficult to remove after
synthesis but benefits from a high boiling point that, in this
case, allows the Heck coupling to proceed rapidly at 130 °C
(19) Typically a Gilson 233XL XYZ liquid handler was used for both automated
injection and fraction collection. Website: http://gilson.com.
Vol. 11, No. 3, 2007 / Organic Process Research & Development
•
461

within a reasonable residence time (approx 25 min20).
However, these conditions may be attained in a flow reactor
using a more benign but lower boiling solvent by operating
under superheated conditions at elevated pressure to prevent
boiling. To this effect, we examined the use of ethanol as a
more acceptable alternative to DMF and quickly established
that using an in-line 100 psi back-pressure regulator, ethanol
could be safely heated to 130 °C under continuous flow
conditions, and that the Heck cross-coupling reaction between
4′-iodoacetophenone (49 mg, 0.2 mmol) and 2-vinylpyri-
dine (31 mg, 0.3 mmol) in the presence of triethylamine
(30 mg, 0.3 mmol) proceeded just as efficiently as when
using DMF as the system solvent (Scheme 1).21 Following
workup and evaporation as before, NMR confirmed that the
desired product 6 was obtained in high yield (86%) and purity
(99%).
This protocol was exploited to prepare a library of cross-
coupled Heck products in ethanol (Table 3); again the
conversion and purity were determined by LC-MS and
NMR in each case.
The reactor was reused at least 25 times without regen-
eration, and consecutive use of the column does not seem
to affect its efficiency. However, if necessary, it could easily
be regenerated by repeating the same procedure used initially
to prepare Pd(0) nanoparticles.
Conclusion
A new organic monolithic Pd(0) reactor has been devel-
oped. This reactor can be used in conjugation with a simple
flow-through setup which can easily be automated. The
reaction can potentially be scaled up, and the monolith is
reusable. The problem of separating the catalyst from the
product is largely circumvented. Although some degree of
Pd leaching was observed in flow mode the problem could
be eliminated by the in-line use of Quadrapure TU metal
scavenger. When compared to other monolithic systems, the
new system has a higher loading capacity, it is easier and
cheaper to prepare, and less practical problems are encoun-
tered. The reactor can be used with a wide variety of aryl
iodides and alkenes, although aryl iodides are more active
than bromides. The yields in the Heck reaction are generally
very high (>80%), and the reaction time is shorter than its
corresponding batch equivalent23 especially when smaller
amounts of product (<0.5 mmol) are required. In every
example, 40-50 mg of the product were generated and the
catalyst showed good activity and stability during the flow
mode reactions. The process does not require the use of an
inert atmosphere, and DMF, a solvent commonly used for
Heck reactions, can be replaced by ethanol, which both is
less toxic and provides easier workup conditions that are
suitable for automation.
One of the main disadvantages associated with the use
of supported metals is that they typically tend to leach
into solution and that their subsequent removal can be
problematic. In our early experiments, ICP-MS analysis
of the isolated solid products revealed an unacceptable
average metal content of approximately 270 ppm Pd.
However, this problem could be easily resolved by inserting
a second column containing the metal scavenger resin
Quadrapure TU22 directly after the nanoparticular Pd reactor
column. This routinely reduced Pd levels in the isolated
products to below 5 ppm, according to ICP-MS analysis.
Acknowledgment
We thank GlaxoSmithKline for financial support (to N.N.)
and Novartis for a research fellowship (to S.V.L.). We
gratefully acknowledge the assistance of David Jefferson who
performed the HRTEM imaging studies and EDS analysis.
ICP-MS measurements were obtained by Jason A. Day.
Mercury porosimetry and BET nitrogen absorption data were
obtained by Wayne Hough.
Received for review February 19, 2007.
OP7000436
(20) In practise, a range of residence times are observed, but an average value
may be obtained empirically by loop injection of a plug of either a visible
dye or a UV active substrate and determining the time at which a maximal
response is observed at the outflow (allowing for dead volumes in the tubing
used at the column inlet and outlet).
(21) Karbass, N.; Sans, V.; Garcia-Verdugo, E.; Burguete, M. I.; Luis, S. V.
Chem. Commun. 2006, 3095-3097.
(22) Quadrapure TU [655422], a thiourea-based scavenger resin with a high
affinity for metal ions. Commercially available from Sigma-Aldrich.
Website: http://www.sigmaaldrich.com.
(23) Zhou, L.; Wang, L. Synthesis 2006, 2649-2652.
462
•
Vol. 11, No. 3, 2007 / Organic Process Research & Development