5644 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 39, No. 25, 2000
Chmielewski and Latos-Graz˘yn´ski
range that could be examined. The extrapolated intercepts do
not correspond to the suitable diamagnetic references. The
observed deviations from the Curie law resemble those seen
for high-spin nickel(II) heteroporphyrins.24,31-38
ized on a porphyrin π-cation radical and on an oxophlorin radical
were previously reported.65,66 Consequently, we have concluded
that the observed paramagnetic shifts of 3 reflect simultaneous
contributions of two spin density sources, i.e., the high-spin
nickel(II) ion and a carbaporphyrin anion radical. For 3, there
are several electronic structures that need to be considered which
are differentiated by the distributions of the unpaired electron
spin densities and/or by the interactions between the magnetic
centers. Thus, a metal-centered reduction results in the formation
of a nickel(I) complex with a classical d9 electronic configu-
ration, e.g., PNiIPh (P ) (2-NCH3-21-CH3CTPP)-). On the other
hand, a ligand-centered reduction produces a carbaporphyrin
anion radical. The resulting electron configurations are as
follows: (a) (P•-)NiIIPh antiferromagnetically coupled (NiII(h.s),
The spectroscopic data reported here indicate that (2-NCH3-
21-CH3CTPP)NiIIPh (2) undergoes a one-electron reduction by
phenyllithium without a substantial disruption of the molecular
geometry. The 1H NMR data for 3 show a number of remarkable
features that must arise from its unusual molecular and electronic
structures. With regard to molecular structure, the observation
of paramagnetic shifted σ-phenyl resonances is of particular
importance. It is consistent with the presence of a five-coordinate
high-spin nickel(II) ion apically coordinated by a σ-phenyl.31-33
As a matter of fact, the isotropic shift of the σ-phenyl can be
used here as the definitive and selective probe of the high-spin
electronic state of the nickel(II) ion for the composite electronic
structure of 3. The large downfield shift of the 21-CH3 group
(Table 1) implies a preservation of the equatorial nickel(II)-
carbon(21) bond.
1H NMR spectroscopy has been shown to be the definitive
method for characterizing paramagnetic metalloporphyrins.48-51
The paramagnetic shifts of porphyrins and porphyrin substituents
are sensitive to the electronic structure of metalloporphyrins.
Consequently, similar spectra can be observed independently
of the metal ion coordinated by a porphyrin, showing the
similarity of the ground electronic states. Two classes of
metalloporphyrins may be relevant models expected to share
spectroscopic features with [(2-NCH3-21-CH3CTPP)NiPh]- (3)
and [(2-NCH3-21-CH3CTPP)Ni(n-Bu)]- (4). These are (a) iron
porphyrin π-cation radicals51-57 and (b) two-electron-reduced
high- or low-spin iron(III) porphyrins.50,58-61 In the second case,
the electronic structure can be described as the resonance hybrid
of two extreme canonical structures, i.e., an iron(I) porphyrin
and an iron(II) porphyrin π-anion radical. Apparently two
paramagnetic centers in the metalloporphyrin are required to
produce some of the NMR features detected for 3 and 4.
Furthermore, both the large spread of meso-phenyl resonances
and the shift alternation of the pyrrole resonance signs have
precedent, particularly in systems with intrinsic asymmetries
of porphyrin skeletons.62-64 Similarly, the pertinent couplings
between high-spin nickel(II) ions and unpaired electrons local-
1
3
S ) /2); (b) (P•-)NiIIPh ferromagnetically coupled (S ) /2);
1
(c) (P•-)NiIIPh uncoupled or weakly coupled (S ) 1, S ) /2).
In the case of [(2-NCH3-21-CH3CTPP)NiPh]-, which is EPR
silent in frozen toluene solution at 77 K, nickel-centered
reduction can be excluded on the basis of the fact that nickel(I)
in a macrocyclic environment is expected to display character-
1
istic EPR spectra.32,36,67-69 Typically, H NMR spectra of d9
metalloporphyrin ions are beyond detection, as T1e is relatively
long. Detectable NMR signals could be observed solely using
deuterium NMR spectroscopy.36,70 Similarly, porphyrin radicals
typically reveal well-resolved EPR but not 1H NMR spectra.58,71
However once the interaction between two paramagnetic centers
is accessible, the mutual interaction leads to the shortening of
T1e, affording well-resolved paramagnetic shifted 1H NMR
resonances, even for d9 metal ions or anion porphyrin radi-
cals.49,58,60 Hence the 1H NMR meso-phenyl resonance pattern
of 3 is clearly consistent with the presence of the large π-spin
density on the carbaporphyrin. This reflects the anion radical
electronic structure of the equatorial ligand. Presumably the
unpaired carbaporphyrin electron is localized in the π orbital
having its spin density at the four selected pyrrole positions
and two of the four meso-carbons. The remaining pyrrole shifts
are due to the high-spin nickel(II) ion, as in 2.
The origin of the direction of the meso-phenyl shifts in the
1H NMR spectra of metal complexes containing porphyrin
radicals has been a matter of interest. It appears that a correlation
exists between these shifts and the coupling of porphyrin and
metal spins.52-57,62,64 For metalloporphyrin radicals in which
the porphyrin and metal spins are antiferromagnetically coupled,
the phenyl rings show downfield shifts for ortho and para
protons and upfield shifts for meta protons. For complexes in
which there is no antiferromagnetic coupling, the pattern is
reversed; i.e., ortho and para resonances are located upfield and
meta resonances downfield. Thus the meso-phenyl NMR
features determined for 3 resemble the second situation, which
excludes strong antiferromagnetic coupling in the ground
electronic state.
(48) La Mar, G. N.; Walker, F. A. In The Porphyrins; Dolphin, D., Ed.;
Academic Press: New York, 1979; pp 61-312.
(49) Bertini, I.; Luchinat, C. NMR of Paramagnetic Molecules in Biological
Systems; The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co.: Reading, MA,
1986.
(50) Bertini, I.; Luchinat, C. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1996, 150, 131.
(51) Walker, F. A.; Simonis, U. In NMR of Paramagnetic Molecules;
Berlinger, L. J., Reuben, J., Eds.; Biological Magnetic Resonance,
Vol. 12; Plenum Press: New York, 1993; p 133.
(52) Gans, P.; Buisson, G.; Duwe, E.; Marchon, J.-C.; Erler, B. S.; Scholz,
W. F.; Reed, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 1223.
(53) Goff, H. M.; Phillippi, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 7567.
(54) Groves, J. T.; Haushalter, R. C.; Nakamura, M.; Nemo, T. E.; Evans,
B. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 284.
(63) Balch, A. L.; Latos-Graz˘yn´ski, L.; Noll, B. C.; Olmstead, M. M.;
Szterenberg, L.; Zovinka, E. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 11846.
(64) Rachlewicz, K.; Latos-Graz˘yn´ski, L. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 1136.
(65) Renner, M. W.; Barkigia, K. M.; Melamed, D.; Smith, K. M.; Fajer,
J. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 5120.
(55) Balch, A. L.; Latos-Graz˘yn´ski, L.; Renner, M. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1985, 107, 2983.
(56) Mandon, D.; Weiss, R.; Jayaraj, K.; Gold, A.; Terner, J.; Bill, E.;
Trautwein, A. X. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 4404.
(57) Fujii, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4641.
(66) Balch, A. L.; Noll, B. C.; Phillips, S. L.; Reid, S. M.; Zovinka, E. P.
Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 4730.
(67) Busch, D. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1978, 11, 392.
(58) Hickman, D. L.; Shirazi, A.; Goff, H. M. Inorg. Chem. 1985, 24, 563.
(59) Donohoe, R. J.; Atamian, M.; Bocian, D. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987,
109, 5593.
(60) Yamaguchi, K.; Morishima, I. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 3216.
(61) Kadish, K. M.; Van Caemelbecke, E.; D’Souza, F.; Lin, M.; Nurco,
D. J.; Medforth, C. J.; Forsyth, T. P.; Krattinger, B.; Smith, K. M.;
Fukuzumi, S.; Nakanishi, I.; Shelnutt, J. A. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38,
2188.
(68) Chmielewski, P. J.; Grzeszczuk, M.; Latos-Graz˘yn´ski, L.; Lisowski,
J. Inorg. Chem. 1989, 28, 3546.
(69) Renner, M. W.; Furelind, L. R.; Barkigia, K. M.; Forman, A.; Sim,
H.-K.; Simpson, D. J.; Smith, K. M.; Fajer, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991,
113, 6891.
(70) Godziela, G. M.; Goff, H. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 2237.
(71) Fajer, J.; Davis, M. S. In The Porphyrins; Dolphin, D., Ed.; Academic
Press: New York, 1979; p 198.
(62) Balch, A. L.; Cornman, C. R.; Latos-Graz˘yn´ski, L.; Renner, M. W. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 2230.