linearly the phenanthroline to open up a multitude of potential
applications, e.g., in material chemistry for tunable fluoro-
phores.12
Scheme 2
In principle, several ways to prepare unsymmetric 3,8-
disubstituted 1,10-phenanthrolines should be feasible. How-
ever, since regioselective aromatic halogenation at the
phenanthroline core using two different halogens is still an
unsolved problem, a synthetic procedure was searched
allowing for the preparation of unsymmetric 3,8-disubstituted
1,10-phenanthrolines starting from 3,8-dibromo-1,10-phenan-
throline (2). In a first attempt, we sought to effect mono-
lithiation of 2 (Scheme 3). However, when 2 was reacted
Scheme 3
As a prerequisite for the preparation of D (Scheme 2), we
need linear bis- or oligophenanthrolines containing both the
steric blocking units (see Scheme 1) and two different
reactive functionalities at the 3,8-positions of the phenan-
throline core. A search in the Beilstein database reveals that
basically all 3,8-unsymmetric phenanthrolines follow the
pattern 3-R (R ) Hal, alkyl, aryl, C(dO)R′) and 8-H. An
exception is 3-tert-butyl-8-methylphenanthroline,11 but that
is not a suitable candidate for linear extension. Herein, we
want to describe the difficulties we encountered in preparing
3,8-unsymmetric phenanthroline ligands and finally detail a
convenient and brief synthetic access to the unsymmetric
phenanthroline 1. Our approach constitutes the first prepara-
with lithium (2 equiv) only a small amount of 3-bromo-8-
lithiophenanthroline (3) was obtained (18%). Moreover,
reactivity of 3 vs ethyl formate to furnish 4 was too low for
an efficient trapping of the lithiated species.
Another attempt was to react 2 with trimethylsilylacetylene
(1 equiv) in the presence of PdCl2(PPh3)2, but to our surprise
only the symmetric ligand 5 (26%) was formed in addition
to some unreacted starting material (Scheme 4). This finding
Scheme 4
tion of an unsymmetric phenanthroline with two diverse
reactive groups in the 3,8-positions allowing for extending
(5) (a) Dietrich-Buchecker, C.; Frommberger, B.; Lu¨er, I.; Sauvage, J.-
P.; Vo¨gtle, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1434-1437. (b)
Amabilino, D. B.; Ashton, P. R.; Reder, A. S.; Spencer, N.; Stoddart, J. F.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 433-437. (c) Fujita, M. Chem.
Soc. ReV. 1998, 27, 417-426.
(6) (a) Frontiers in Supramolecular Organic Chemistry and Photochem-
istry; Schneider, H.-J., Du¨rr, H., Eds.; VCH: Weinheim, 1991. (b) Dietrich,
B.; Viout, P.; Lehn, J.-M. Macrocyclic Chemistry; VCH: Weinheim, 1993.
(c) Davies, R. R.; Kuang, H.; Qi, D.; Mazhary, A.; Mayaan, E.; Distefano,
M. D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 79-84. (d) Gallo, E.; Ragaini,
F.; Cenini, S.; Demartin, F. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 586, 190-195.
(7) Sauvage, J.-P. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 611-619.
(8) (a) Schmittel, M.; Ganz, A. Chem. Commun. 1997, 999-1000. (b)
Schmittel, M.; Ganz, A.; Fenske, D.; Herderich, M. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans. 2000, 353-359.
(9) Schmittel, M.; Michel, C.; Ganz, A.; Herderich, M. J. Prakt. Chem.
1999, 341, 228-236.
can be explained because of the low solubility of 2. As the
first alkynylation increases drastically the solubility, the
subsequent alkynylation to furnish 5 is an efficient homo-
geneous phase reaction. To avoid this problem, we reacted
2 with equal amounts of trimethylsilylacetylene and prop-
argyl alcohol again under Sonogashira coupling conditions.
(10) Schmittel, M.; Michel, C. Unpublished results.
(11) Belser, P.; Bernhard, S.; Guerig, U. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 2937-
2944.
(12) Joshi, H. S.; Jamshidi, R.; Tor, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999,
38, 2722-2725.
3960
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 25, 2000