240
T. J. Hodgkinson et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 10 (2000) 239±241
Scheme 1. Method A: (i) H2, Pd/C, MeOH; (ii) NH4OH, Et3N, HOBt, PyBOP, DMF. Method B: (i) H2, Pd/C, MeOH; (ii) 4-methoxybenzlamine,
Et3N, HOBt, PyBOP, DMF; (iii) CAN, MeCN/H2O.
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (i) Et2Zn, CH2I2, CH2Cl2, 87%; (ii) 1-naphthoyl chloride, Et3N, DMAP, CH2Cl2, 91%; (iii) H2, Pd/C, MeOH;
(iv) 4-methoxybenzylamine, Et3N, HOBt, PyBOP, DMF, 93% from 9; (v) CAN, MeCN/H2O, 73%.
benzyl ester into the primary amide (Scheme 1). Two
dierent methods were used for this later conversion,
although we have found that the more direct approach
is generally higher yielding (i.e. Method A). In addition,
(2R,3R)-3 was made in an identical fashion to our
published route to (2S,3S)-3 by using AD-mix-b in the
asymmetry inducing dihydroxylation step.9,10
have determined that epoxide (2S,3S)-3 is highly cyto-
toxic and has potency comparable to the established
anti-tumour agents mitomycin C and cisplatin (entry 1,
cf. entries 11 and 12). The enantiomer of this com-
pound, (2R,3R)-2, was found to be slightly less potent
indicating some level of chiral recognition (entry 1, cf.
entry 2). The epoxide ring is clearly important for cyto-
toxic activity as cyclopropane 10 was essentially inactive
(entry 4, cf. entry 8). The potency of these compounds is
highly dependent on the nature of the aromatic residue
(entry 1, cf. entries 3±7). Even a very subtle change from
the methyl to ethyl ether at C-3 of the naphthalene
residue results in a substantial loss of potency (entry 1,
cf. entry 7). It is also notable that epoxide 7d containing
the 2-quinoxaloyl group, an established DNA inter-
calating group,14 was completely inactive.15 Addition-
ally, it is interesting that we observed a loss of potency
when the amide functionality was further substituted
(entry 1 cf. entries 9 and 10).
In accordance with the postulated mechanism of action
of the azinomycins,5,6 we imagined that the cytotoxic
activity of metabolite 3 might arise from monoalkyla-
tion of DNA by the reactive epoxide moiety. To test this
hypothesis, (2S)-10 was made in which the epoxide ring
was replaced by the isosteric but quite inert cyclopro-
pane ring. This was achieved by cyclopropanation11 of
homochiral allylic alcohol (2S)-89,10 followed by con-
version to (2S)-10 along similar lines to that described
above (Scheme 2). From the chemical standpoint, it is
notable that no concomitant cleavage of the cyclopro-
pane ring was observed during the hydrogenation step.
In the case of four representative compounds ((2S,3S)-3
(2R,3R)-3, (2S,3S)-7b and (2S)-10), we have obtained
more direct evidence that these compounds induce
cytotoxicity by alkylating DNA. This was accomplished
by undertaking DNA binding-sequence speci®city stu-
dies using the taq polymerase stop assay.16 In these
experiments, good correlation was observed between
DNA binding and cell growth inhibition potency.
Cyclopropyl amide 10 did not produce any taq stop
sites over background DMSO control levels at up to
50 mM. The other three compounds produced binding
anities which paralled their potency in the cytotoxicity
tests. Further studies directed towards gaining greater
To study the role of the amide substitution pattern,
secondary amides 12 and 13 were made from (2S,3S)-
1110 by selective cleavage of the benzyl ester followed by
coupling with glycine ethyl ester and (S)-valine ethyl
ester respectively (Scheme 3).
With these compounds in hand, our attention turned to
assessing their biological activity. All the compounds
were tested for in vitro cytotoxic activity against a small
panel of human tumour cell lines {A2780, A2780cisR,12
CH1, SKOV-3 (all ovarian) and HT29 (colon)} (Table
1).13 Consistent with Terashima's observations,7 we
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: (i) H2, Pd/C, MeOH; (ii) EtO2CCH2NH2.HCl, Et3N, HOBt, PyBOP, DMF; 89% from 11;
(iii) (S)-EtO2CCH(iPr)NH2.HCl, Et3N, HOBt, PyBOP, DMF, 85% from 11.