1468 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 123, No. 7, 2001
Hu et al.
bound to the cluster. Thus, direct quenching through bonds
formed during binding of the fluorophore to the cluster is the
dominant route for fluorescence quenching.
Because fluorescence can be considered as deriving from an
oscillating excitation dipole, the emission from an excitation
dipole near a metal surface is modeled by classical dipole
antenna theory,31 and an image electron-hole pair can be
induced by generation of an excited state near the surface of
the metal. When the excited dipole is perpendicular to the metal
surface, the image dipole and antenna dipole are 180° out of
phase and cancel. When the excitation dipole is parallel to the
surface, the image dipole reinforces the antenna excitation. The
observed fluorescence quenching in cluster 2 supports the
assertion that the thiol units are attached such that the trans-
stilbene moieties are oriented at an angle from the surface such
that there is a substantial electronic component roughly per-
pendicular to the surface of the metal particle. This implies that
the singlet excitation dipole of trans-stilbene will extend along
the axis that links the center of the two phenyl rings,32 producing
substantial fluorescence quenching.
Figure 7. Reaction profile of the solution photolysis of 3 (0.03 M in
CH2Cl2) obtained by H NMR peak integration: (a) the sum of cis/
trans-bromide 3; (b) the sum of trans-bromide 3 and trans-4-hydroxy-
stilbene; (c) the sum of cis-bromide 3 and cis-4-hydroxystilbene.
1
the o-nitrobenzyl linkage was suppressed upon triplet sensitiza-
tion, although 1 did slowly disappear after prolonged irradiation.
As expected from extrapolation of results obtained for stilbene
itself and for 1 in dilute solution, no photodimerization product
could be observed, even after extensive photolysis.
Direct Observation of Photochemical Reactions on
Colloidal Gold Nanoparticles. The direct photolysis of thiol
1 was first examined in methylene chloride. When monitored
by absorption spectroscopy, the absorption of 1 at 306 nm
decreased as the absorption below 277 nm rose, with an
isosbestic point at 277 nm, Figure 4. Such absorption changes
are typical for trans-cis photoisomerization of stilbenoids.17
The growth of absorption beyond 345 nm, together with an
isosbestic point at about 550 nm, indicates photodetachment of
the o-nitrobenzyl ether moiety,33 thus affecting directly the
position and intensity of the plasmon band as the identity of
the bound chemical species is altered. When the photolysis was
Direct irradiation of cluster 2 revealed photoreactivity of its
stilbene group very similar to that in its precursor 1. As shown
in Figure 3, the trans-stilbene absorption peak at about 300 nm
decreases upon irradiation at 350 nm with simultaneous growth
in intensity below 270 nm with an isosbestic point at 270 nm,
indicating production of the cis-isomer.17 It is interesting that a
large shift of the gold plasmon band (from 530 to 550 nm) was
observed as the photoreaction proceeded. Because the surface
plasmon band is very sensitive to changes in properties at the
metal/dielectric interface, the observed shift indicates a steep
change in dielectric36 that can be plausibly attributed to the
photodetachment of the highly polar 4-hydroxystilbene group
from the cluster surface.
Because the singlet state is effectively quenched by inter-
actions with the gold core, it is likely that the geometric
isomerization can take place from either the singlet or triplet
manifold, as is typical for many simple olefins.35 When the
isomerization takes place through the triplet manifold, it will
dominate over a lower quantum yield process. The lower
quantum efficiency observed for all conversions in 2 than in 1
thus makes it difficult to rule out completely any singlet state
involvement.
1
scaled to preparative quantities and monitored by H NMR
spectroscopy, the bromide precursor 3, instead of thiol 1, was
employed since 1 and 3 presented virtually identical excited-
state profiles. The chemical shifts of the two trans-stilbene vinyl
hydrogens in 1 (7.02 and 6.96 ppm, JAB ) 16 Hz) gradually
converted into those characteristic of the cis form (7.09 and
7.06 ppm, JAB ) 8.8 Hz),34 and the benzylic proton signals of
the o-nitrobenzyl ether moiety (4.4 ppm) disappeared. The
spectral bands assigned to both the cis- and trans-stilbenoids
were present in the NMR spectrum of the bulk photolysis of
trans-3 at 350 nm. The photoinduced production of the cis-
isomer was unambiguously established by the isolation of the
cis-3 and a mixture of both geometric isomers of 4-hydroxy-
stilbene. We could observe no photodimerization product, within
the limits of detection of this method (<5%). Therefore, the
photoreaction of thiol 1 proceeds as shown in Scheme 2 through
competing geometric isomerization and photocleavage.
It is also interesting that the trans-to-cis isomerization is
observed in cluster 2, whereas the analogous trans-to-cis
geometric photoisomerization is blocked in self-assembled
monolayer 4. The latter includes a similar stilbenoid bound at
The photoisomerization of the stilbene group in 1 is
more efficient than the photodissociation of the o-nitrobezyl
1
moiety. By monitoring the course of the reaction by H NMR
spectroscopy, the progress of the two photoreactions (geometric
isomerization and benzyllic cleavage) could be deconvoluted,
Figure 7. Under constant irradiation of dilute solutions (0.03
M in stilbene) at 350 nm, the photoisomerization reaches a
photostationary state after about 25 min of irradiation, whereas
the competing dissociation required about 60 min to complete.
A much cleaner geometric photoisomerization was observed
when the reaction was triplet photosensitized with 1,4-dibromo-
naphthalene (ET ) 58.1 kcal/mol).35 The photodissociation of
an angle similar to that observed in 2,9 but on planar gold with
larger metal facets, better packing of the trans-stilbene groups
sterically blocks the isomerization. In contrast, the corresponding
cis-isomer of 4 is less well-packed and can photoisomerize
easily. It seems likely, therefore, that the surface disorder
(32) Kawski, A.; Kubicki, A. Acta Phys. Pol. A 1991, 79, 457.
(33) Pillai, V. N. R. In Organic Photochemistry; Padwa, A., Ed.; Marcel
Dekker: New York, 1987; Vol. 9.
(35) Murov, S. L.; Carmichael, I.; Hug, G. L. Handbook of Photo-
chemistry, 2nd ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1993.
(34) Fisher, T. H.; Schultz, T. P. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1991, 29, 966.
(36) Lazarides, A. A.; Schatz, G. C. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 460.