Organic Letters
Letter
can be accessed from alkanes,14c our method constitutes an
a
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Boronic Esters 2
alternative for direct radical C−H borylation.18
Cyclohexyl sulfide 1a was selected as a model substrate and
its reaction with bis(catecholato)diboron was evaluated (Table
1). The reaction was best performed in the presence of an
Table 1. Optimization Studies
a
number
deviation from optimized condition
yield of 2a,
%
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
-
82
80
45
-
-
-
-
67
17
62
59
42
-
-
-
No catalyst
DMA as solvent
DMSO as solvent
MeCN as solvent
MeOH as solvent
No catalyst, MeCN as solvent
Ir(ppy)3 as photocatalyst
Ru(bpy)3(PF6)2 as photocatalyst
4CzIPN as photocatalyst
Blue LED
b
b
b
b
b
Blue LED, no catalyst
No light
B2Pin2 as reagent
B2Npg2 as reagent
a
b
Isolated yield. Determined by GC analysis.
organic photocatalyst (3DPA2FBN)19 in N,N-dimethylforma-
mide as the solvent under irradiation with 400 nm light.
Subsequent treatment of the mixture with pinacol and
triethylamine led to boronic ester 2a. Of special note is that
in the absence of the photocatalyst, the product was formed
with similar yield. However, while carrying out variation of
substrates, we observed that the use of the photocatalyst gave
consistently better yields. With Ir and Ru based catalysts, as
well as with blue LED irradiation, inferior yields were
observed. Diboron reagents having pinacolate (B2Pin2) or
neopentyl glycolate (B2Npg2) were ineffective.
A series of PyfS-compounds 1 were obtained via different
protocols such as double bond thiol addition, C−H activation,
atom transfer reaction, nucleophilic substitution of alkyl halide
with the thiolate, and interaction of a free thiol with
pentafluoropyridine. Under optimized conditions, these
sulfides were converted into boronic esters 2 (Scheme 2).
The reaction typically works well with primary and secondary
sulfides. Benzylic substrate, which generates less reactive
benzylic radical, also afforded the target boronic ester 2j.
The ester group is tolerated (product 2o), while a substrate
bearing the acetoxy group located at the γ-position with
respect to the sulfide provided moderate yield of the expected
product (compound 2p), which may be associated with
inductive effect of the acetoxy group. When 1,3-disulfide was
subjected to standard conditions, the substitution of the
second PyS-group was slow, requiring 2 days for the formation
of product 2q. Rewardingly, tertiary sulfides furnished
corresponding boronic esters, though with moderate yields,
presumably due to facile oxidation of intermediate tertiary
radicals to carbocations (compounds 2r−u). The reaction
a
b
c
Isolated yield. In the absence of the catalyst. Reaction time 48 h.
performed on a gram scale (1.06 g of 1a) afforded the product
in 85% isolated yield. α,α-Difluorinated sulfide (4-
PhC6H4CH2CF2SPyf) derived from difluorostyrene14a was
also evaluated. Though the starting sulfide was consumed,
treatment of the reaction mixture with either pinacol/triethyl
ammine or potassium hydrogen difluoride did not afford the
product.
Concerning the mechanism, the reaction may proceed via
either catalyst-free or catalytic pathways (Scheme 3). In the
former case, the diboron reagent and DMF are expected to
form the EDA complex. Subsequent irradiation triggers the
electron transfer from the electron-rich boryl fragment to the
electron-poor PyfS-group leading to a radical anion and a
DMF-complexed diboron radical cation. Fragmentation of the
sulfide radical anion generates the alkyl radical and the thiolate,
which can take the boryl group leading to the boryl radical
species A. Formation of the carbon−boron bond may occur by
attack of the alkyl radical at the diboron reagent, in a manner
proposed by Aggarwal.9a Species A is a good electron donor
and can give an electron to the sulfide to regenerate the radical.
In a catalytic pathway, the photoredox step generates the
radical, which then attacks at the diboron reagent. At the final
step, species A is oxidized by the photocatalyst followed by
trapping with the sulfide anion.
The radical character of the process was supported by an
experiment with TEMPO, which inhibited the product
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX