268
Y.-L. Song, C. Morin
LETTER
(19) No boronic acid protecting groups were found to be
compatible with the sensitive nucleoside bond; the use of
reducible ones (see Malan, C.; Morin, C.; Preckher, G.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 6705) was precluded by the
presence of the 2-3 unsaturation of the indole ring.
(20) For previous preparations of 5-iodo indole, see: Thesing, J.;
Semler, G.; Mohr, G. Chem. Ber. 1962, 95, 2205. Hydorn,
A.E. J. Org. Chem. 1967, 32, 4100.
(21) Kazimierczuk, Z.; Cogttan, H.B.; Revankar, G.R.; Robins,
R.K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 6379. Vorbrüggen, H.;
Ruh-Pohlenz, C. Org. React. 1999, 55, 3.
(22) Roland, V.; Kotera, M.; Lhomme, J. Synth. Commun. 1997,
27, 4039.
D.A.; Leonard, S.F.; Pargellis, C.A.; Tong, L.; Adams, J. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 10860. For a recent example of a
boronate replacing the carboxylic acid function in a
biomolecule, see: Feng, S.; Hellberg, M. Tetrahedron Lett.
2000, 41, 5813.
(11) Narula, A.S.; Trifilieff, E.; Luu, B.; Ourisson, G. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1977, 3959.
(12) Song, Y.; Ding, Z.; Wang, Q.; Tao, F. Synth. Commun. 1998,
28, 3757.
(13) To a stirred suspension of cedranediol (2.38g, 10 mmol) in dry
CH2Cl2 (4 mL) under argon at 4 °C was added dropwise fresh
borane-dimethyl sulfide (1.1 mL of a 10 M solution in Me2S)
and the resulting mixture was allowed to warm to room
temperature. After about 10 h, a clear solution was obtained,
which was stirred for an additional 4 h. Evaporation of the
volatiles under reduced pressure (p < 50 mmHg and t < 80 °C)
afforded air-sensitive cedranediolborane 1: 1H NMR
(300MHz, CDCl3) 0.81 (d, J = 7.0Hz, 3H, CH3), 1.04(s, 3H,
CH3), 1.14(s, 3H, CH3), 1.41(s, 3H, CH3), 1.10-2.25(m, 11H,
(23) 10: mp 136-7 °C; 1H NMR (300MHz, CDCl3) 2.43(s, 3H),
2.45(s, 3H), 2.65(m, 1H), 2.84(m, 1H), 4.57(m, 1H), 4.64(m,
2H), 5.71(m, 1H), 6.41(dd, J1 = 5.6Hz, J2 = 8.4Hz, 1H),
6.45(d, J = 3.3Hz, 1H), 7.23-7.30(m, 6H), 7.38(dd, J1 = 1.7Hz,
J2 = 8.7Hz, 1H), 7.91(d, J = 8.2Hz, 2H), 7.93(s, 1H), 7.97(d,
J = 8.2Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (75MHz, CDCl3) 21.86, 21.90,
38.05, 64.31, 75.08, 81.93, 84.01, 85.75, 103.00, 112.08,
124.87, 126.69, 126.98, 129.41, 129.45, 129.85, 129.94,
130.09, 130.59, 131.87, 135.19, 144.26, 144.64, 166.16,
166.38. Anal. calcd. for C29H26INO5: C, 58.50; H, 4.40, N,
2.35. Found : C, 58.75; H, 4.43, N, 2.35.
CH, CH2), 4.13(dd, J1 = 7.0Hz, J2 = 8.4Hz, 1H, OCH); 13
NMR (75MHz, CDCl3) 15.50, 25.63, 28.50, 28.82, 31.07,
36.14, 39.15, 42.04, 42.61, 44.27, 51.67, 57.73, 58.23, 78.21,
85.86.
C
(14) Representative procedure: To a stirred mixture of 4-
iodotoluene (65 mg, 0.3 mmol), CuI (4 mg) and 1 (248 mg, 1.0
mmol) in dry 1,4-dioxane (2 mL) under argon, was added
Et3N (0.5 mL, 3.6 mmol). Ar was bubbled through the reaction
mixture for 20 min before addition of Pd(PPh3)4 (4 mg). The
mixture was then heated to 80 °C and stirred for 20 h. After
being allowed to cool to room temperature, the reaction
mixture was quenched with water and extracted with
cyclohexane. The organic layer was washed with brine and
dried over NaSO4 and, after filtration, the volatiles were
removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by
flash chromatography (9/1 hexane/ethyl acetate) on silica gel
to yield cedranediol p-tolylboronate (87 mg, 86% yield): 1H
NMR (300MHz, CDCl3) 0.82(d, J = 7.0Hz, 3H, CH3),
1.08(s, 3H, CH3), 1.20(s, 3H, CH3), 1.52(s, 3H, CH3), 1.28-
2.35(m, 11H, CH, CH2), 2.40(s, 3H, Ar-CH3), 4.28(dd,
J1 = 7.2Hz, J2 = 8.4Hz, 1H, OCH), 7.23(d, J = 7.8Hz, 2H, Ar-
H), 7.77(d, J = 7.8Hz, 2H, Ar-H); 13C NMR (75MHz, CDCl3)
15.50, 21.90, 25.64, 28.47, 28.54, 31.03, 36.20, 39.29,
42.03, 42.52, 44.06, 51.74, 58.06, 58.18, 78.80, 85.88, 128.75,
135.09, 141.72.
(24) Robbins, M.J.; Robbins, R.K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 89,
4734.
(25) 12: mp 123-5 °C. 1H NMR (300MHz, CDCl3) 0.79(d,
J = 7.0Hz, 3H), 1.07(s, 3H), 1.18(s, 3H), 1.51(s, 3H), 0.88-
2.34(m, 11H), 2.30(m, 1H), 2.52(m, 1H), 3.64(m, 2H),
3.90(m, 1H), 4.27(t, J = 7.6Hz, 1H), 4.45(m, 1H), 6.35(t,
J = 6.4Hz, 1H), 6.57(d, J = 3.2Hz, 1H), 7.19(d, J = 3.2Hz,
1H), 7.48(d, J = 8.3Hz, 1H), 7.71(d, J = 8.3Hz, 1H), 8.17(s,
1H); 13C NMR (75MHz, CDCl3) 15.51, 25.63, 28.49, 28.54,
31.02, 36.17, 39.31, 40.09, 41.99, 42.55, 44.03, 51.79,
58.09(2), 62.61, 71.66, 78.78, 84.62, 85.83, 86.06, 104.31,
109.54, 124.28, 128.54, 128.97, 129.20, 138.35. FAB-HRMS,
m/z (M+H)+: 480.2926 (calcd. for C28H3911BNO5: 480.2922).
(26) 4: [ ]D23 = -27° (c = 0.01, CH3OH). 1H NMR (300MHz,
CD3OD) 2.27(m, 1H), 2.54(m, 1H), 3.65(m, 2H), 3.91(m,
1H), 4.43(m, 1H), 6.40(t, J = 7.0Hz, 1H), 6.48(d, J = 3.2Hz,
1H), 7.40-7.49(m, 2H), 7.55(d, J = 8.4Hz, 1H), 7.83(s, 1H);
13C NMR (75MHz, CD3OD) 40.91, 63.56, 72.72, 86.05,
88.08, 104.38, 110.23, 125.61, 128.17, 130.16, 138.65. 4 was
esterified with cedranediol to yield boronate 12, identical to
the sample prepared above.
(15) Matteson, D.S.; Ray, R.; Rocks, R.R.; Tsai, D.J.
Organometallics 1983, 2, 1536.
(27) For reviews about boronated nucleosides, see refs 1,2 and
also: Gouadgon, N.M.; Fulcrand El-Kattan, G.; Schinazi, R.F.
Nucleosides Nucleotides 1994, 13, 849. Soloway, A.H.; Zhuo,
J.-C.; Rong, F.-G.; Lunato, A.J.; Ives, D.H.; Barth, R.F.;
Anisuzzaman, A.K.M.; Barth, C.D.; Barnum, B.A. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1999, 581, 150. Lesnikowski, Z.J.; Shi, J.;
Schinazi, R.F. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 581, 156.
(28) For a review, see: Kool, E.T.; Morales.J.C.; Guckian, K.M.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 991.
(29) For an example of a nucleoside indole designed for
crosslinking see : Coleman, R.S.; Dong, Y.; Arthur, J.C.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 6867. For use of a 4-substituted
indole nucleoside in DNA recognition see: Chepanoske, C.L.;
Langelier, C.R.; Chmiel, N.H.; David, S.S, Org. Lett. 2000,
1341.
(16) General procedure: A THF solution of 2 and diethanolamine
(2 equiv.) was stirred overnight. After being acidified with 1
M HCl the reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min and then
diluted with water and extracted with ethyl acetate. The
combined organic layers were then extracted with 1M NaOH.
After being acidified to pH 1 with 1 M HCl, the aqueous
extracts were extracted with ethyl acetate to yield pure 3, free
from cedranediol. For acid sensitive compounds, after the
addition of diethanolamine, purification was effected by
column chromatography to remove the cedranediol. Then, to
a solution of the ate complex, Amberlite IRC-50 (H+) was
added portionwise until pH 7 was reached whereupon the
mixture was stirred for an additional 2 h, before final
purification (cc on silica gel).
(17) Wojtowicz-Rajchel, A.; Golankiewicz K. Org. Prep. Proced.
Int. 1998, 30, 433. See also: Schinazi, R.F.; Prusoff, W.H. J.
Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 841. Gronowitz, S.; Hörnfeldt, A.B.;
Kristjansson, V.; Musil, T. Chem. Scripta 1986, 26, 305.
(18) Morin, C.; Rescourio, G. unpublished results (Rescourio, G.
Diplôme d'Etudes Approfondies, Grenoble 1999).
(30) Bean, F.R.; Johnson, J.R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1932, 54, 4415.
(31) Nielsen, D.R.; McEwen, W.E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79,
3081.
(32) Das, R.; Kundu, N.G. Synth. Commun. 1988, 18, 855.
Article Identifier:
1437-2096,E;2001,0,02,0266,0268,ftx,en;G24100ST.pdf
Synlett 2001, No. 2, 266–268 ISSN 0936-5214 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York