2420
T.F. Novitsky et al. / Polymer 51 (2010) 2417e2425
There are two main effects that create Mn differences in the
small peak shift changes; therefore peaks were aligned based on the
-amide carbon. The -amide carbon (4) shows two distinct peaks
copolymers: differential diamine volatility and the physical state of
the polymer during the reaction. Excess diamine is required in
order to maintain balanced stoichiometry. The amount of excess
needed is a function of the volatility of the diamine during the
polymerization and the polymerization conditions used. Since,
hexa-, deca-, and dodecamethylene diamine have different melting
points and vapor pressures, using a constant 3 mol-% excess
diamine for all copolymer compositions will not result in the same
stoichiometric balance under identical polymerization conditions.
For example, PA-12,T, 85:15 and 70:30 PA-12,T-co-6,T had intrinsic
viscosities of 1.14, 1.21, and 1.24, respectively. Increasing the
amount of PA-6,T comonomer has a greater impact on stoichio-
metric imbalance, because a higher fraction of the more volatile
HMDA (compared to deca- and dodecamethylene diamine) is
present. If equal molecular weights were desired, the amount of
excess diamine would need to be increased corresponding to the
amount of PA-6,T comonomer present in order to compensate for
these differences in volatility of the two diamine monomers.
Another cause of molecular weight variation is the physical state
of the polymer during the reaction, as determined by the rela-
tionship between the crystalline melting temperature of the poly-
mer and the maximum reaction temperature. Table 1 lists the DSC
melting temperatures of several of the copolymers. The 1st heating
DSC data are related to the crystalline state of the polymer formed
during the reaction. Comparison of the IV and DSC data shows that
when the melting temperature of the polymer is higher than the
maximum polymerization temperature, the intrinsic viscosity is
notably higher. The melting temperatures of PA-10,T (327 ꢀC),
50:50 10,T:6,T (324 ꢀC) and 50:50 12,T:6,T (328 ꢀC) are substantially
higher than the final reaction temperature of 315 ꢀC. These poly-
mers also have the highest intrinsic viscosities (1.68, 1.68, and 2.17)
and molecular weights (19,700, 19,700, and 27,000). Comparison of
a molten (PA-12,T e Tm ¼ 295 ꢀC) and crystallized polymer (50:50
PA-12,T-co-6,T e Tm ¼ 328 ꢀC) shows a near doubling of intrinsic
viscosity from 1.14 to 2.14 dL/g. This behavior is presumed to be due
to solid state polymerization that occurs after the crystallization
takes place within the reactor, a well-known phenomenon in nylon
and polyester synthesis. Crystallization of polymer from the reac-
tion increases the concentration of reactive groups in the melt and
will drive the polymerization to higher conversions relative to
a fully molten sample under the same polymerization conditions.
Despite the Mn differences discussed above, the copolymers
could all be compression molded into tough, flexible films. This
indicates that all copolymers were obtained with molecular
weights above the critical value needed for good cumulative
interactions and chain entanglement; thus, molecular weight
variation effects in the obtained results are considered negligible. It
is noteworthy to mention that the compression molding of 50:50
PA-12,T-co-6,T (the highest Mn) was the most difficult, requiring
a much higher temperature and pressure compared to the other
copolymers. Semi-aromatic polyamides are known to have mark-
edly higher melt viscosities than all-aliphatic polyamides, and an IV
of 2.16 (Mn w 27,000) may be approaching the upper limit with
regard to processability of these materials.
a
a
representing the fraction of PA-12,T and PA-6,T in the copolymers.
Their peak heights were found to correspond to the monomer feed
ratios. Note that samples were prepared in wt-%, e.g., 50:50 wt-% is
approximately 45:55 mol-% PA-12,T-co-6,T. This is significant since
NMR spectral intensities reflect molar compositions.
In addition to the substituted aromatic carbon (2) peaks (Fig. 4,
left) for PA-12,T and 6,T at 137.74 and 137.62 ppm respectively, two
new peaks appear for all copolymers. The new peaks are due to the
formation of PA-12,TePA-6,T alternating sequences. This is further
confirmed by comparing the 50:50 wt-% copolymer and
a 50:50 wt-% mixed solution of the two homopolymers shown in
Fig. 5. The physical mixture of the two homopolymers shows only
two peaks for the substituted aromatic carbon, while the 50:50
copolymer has four peaks (Fig. 5, a and b). The new peaks are due to
PA-12,TePA-6,T alternating sequences and have identical peak
heights. These data are consistent with completely random copol-
ymers [15]. For example, for the 50:50 wt-% PA-12,T-co-6,T copol-
ymers, the ratio of 12,T-12,T:12,T-6,T:6,T-6,T units is approximately
1:2:1, as expected for statistically random copolymers.
The relative peak intensities for varying amounts of PA-12,T, PA-
6,T, and PA-12,TePA-6,T sequences formed by varying the PA-6,T
content of the copolymer from 15 to 50 wt-% are shown in Fig. 4
(left). At 15 wt-% PA-6,T (Fig. 4b), a small broad peak between the
peaks for pure PA-6,T and the 12,T-6,T unit is seen. Comparison
with the corresponding peak of the PA-12,TePA-6,T sequence
indicates little if any homo-sequences of PA-6,T exist at a 15 wt-%
loading. At 30 wt-% PA-6,T, the peak due to PA-6,T homo-sequences
increases, but the number of these sequences is still small
compared to the 12,T and 12,T-6,T sequences. At 50 wt-% PA-6,T, the
peak for PA-6,T homo-sequences is increased to approximately the
same number as seen for 12,T homo-units and half that of 12,T-6,T
sequences, what would be expected for a random melt condensa-
tion polymer. Since crystallinity is partially dependent on regularity
of the polymer structure, the behavior of the substituted aromatic
carbon should provide sequence information needed to help
understand the eutectic melting behavior of the copolymer series
as discussed below.
3.3. Differential scanning calorimetry
A series of second-heating DSC thermograms of PA-10,T-co-6,T
(top trace) and 12,T-co-6,T (bottom trace) copolymers are shown in
Fig. 6. Melting temperatures and enthalpies are plotted versus wt-%
PA-6,T in Fig. 7. PA-10,T and PA-12,T homopolymers have melting
temperatures of 315 and 292 ꢀC, respectively. Copolymers showed
3.2. 13C NMR spectroscopy
High resolution NMR spectroscopy was used to determine
copolymer composition and comonomer distribution. The 13C NMR
spectrum for PA-12,T is shown in Fig. 3. NMR spectra of the PA-10,T
(12,T), 6,T copolymers showed multiple peaks for carbon atoms 1, 2,
3, and 4. Fig. 4 shows expanded regions of the a-amide carbon (4)
and substituted aromatic carbon (2) of the related PA-12,T, PA-6,T
copolymers. Slight variations in sample viscosity and solvent caused
Fig. 3. 13C NMR spectrum of PA-12,T.