J. A. Smulik, S. T. Di6er / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 171–174
9 eq 7, 5 mol % 2,
173
OBz
OBz
45º C, DCM, 1 h;
H
OBz
O
(3)
(4)
O
O
H
+
N
PhH (reflux),
18 h
N
CH3
O
N
4
H3C
H
O
H3C
O
H
29 (41 %)
30 (42 %)
C4H9
9 eq 7, 5 mol % 2,
45º C, DCM, 2 h;
C4H9
N
N
H
Ts
N
Ts
O
O
Ts
O
H
+
N
PhH (reflux),
18 h
N
CH3
O
N
H3C
H3C
H
O
11
O
H
31 (42 %)
32 (28 %)
Scheme 1. Tandem metathesis-[4+2] cycloaddition sequence.
little influence on the diastereoselectivity. Internal alky-
nes produce the desired products albeit with lower
conversion; longer reaction time gave additional uniden-
tified products. Reactions conducted using complex 1
failed to give useful conversions in all alkyne substrates
explored. For instance, reaction of 4 with 9 equiv.
1,5-hexadiene using 5 mol% 1 at 45°C gave 10% conver-
sion after 1 h along with considerable amounts of
homodimer and other unidentified products.
Society (33298G1) and SUNY Buffalo for financial
support of this work. J.A.S. is the recipient of an NIH
predoctoral fellowship (GM20439) which is gratefully
acknowledged.
References
1. (a) Weskamp, T.; Schattenmann, W. C.; Spiegler, M.;
Herrmann, W. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37,
2490. (b) Weskamp, T.; Schattenmann, W. C.; Spiegler,
M.; Herrmann, W. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38,
262. (c) Weskamp, T.; Kohl, F. J.; Hieringer, W.; Gleich,
D.; Herrmann, W. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38,
2416. (d) Scholl, M.; Trnka, T. M.; Morgan, J. P.; Grubbs,
R. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2247. (e) Ackermann, L.;
Fu¨rstner, A.; Weskamp, T.; Kohl, F. J.; Herrmann, W. A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4787. (f) Scholl, M.; Ding, S.;
Lee, C. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1751. (g)
Huang, J.; Stevens, E. D.; Nolan, S. P.; Petersen, J. L. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2674. (h) Jafarpour, L.; Nolan,
S. P. Organometallics 2000, 19, 2055. (i) Fu¨rstner, A.;
Thiel, O. R.; Ackermann, L.; Schanz, H.-J.; Nolan, S. P. J.
Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 2204. (j) Chatterjee, A. K.; Morgan,
J. P.; Scholl, M.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 3783. Recent review: (k) Fu¨rstner, A. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3012.
To explore the utility of the diene products obtained from
tandem metathesis and to corroborate their structural
assignment,7 the crude mixtures were subjected to Diels–
Alder reaction with N-methylmaleimide (Scheme 1). The
consecutive cycloaddition gives bicyclic products of sub-
stantially greater molecular complexity than the alkyne
and alkene starting materials.8
The effectiveness of this approach is illustrated for two
representative terminal alkynes in Scheme 1. The ratios
of the intermediate dienes correspond to the isolated
yields of cycloadducts. For instance, 4 underwent tandem
metathesis (1 h, 45°C) to give a 1:1.2 mixture of 5 and
6 (above, eq. 2), which underwent thermal cycloaddition
to yield a 1:1 mixture of cycloadducts, separated by
column chromatography in 41 and 42% isolated yield for
29 and 30, respectively.9 Similar results were obtained for
propargyl amine derivative 11 (eq. 4).
2. (a) Smulik, J. A.; Diver, S. T. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65,
1788. (b) Smulik, J. A.; Diver, S. T. Org. Lett. 2000, 2,
2271.
In summary, a novel tandem intermolecular alkyne-diene
cross metathesis/in situ ring closing metathesis sequence
has been documented. Substrate scope on the alkyne
partner suggests that this method will be useful to
prepare a variety of 2-substituted-1,3-cyclohexadienes. A
consecutive Diels–Alder cycloaddition efficiently pro-
vides structurally-complex products. Current investiga-
tions are aimed at improving the selectivity in the cross
metathesis step and exploring the reaction scope using
functionalized dienes.
3. Recent examples of tandem metathesis–metathesis appli-
cations: (a) Randall, M. L.; Tallarico, J. A.; Snapper, M.
L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9610. (b) Zuercher, W. J.;
Hashimoto, M.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 6634. (c) La, D. S.; Ford, J. G.; Sattely, E. S.;
Bonitatebus, P. J.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11603. (d) Stragies, R.; Schuster,
M.; Blechert, S. Chem. Commun. 1999, 237. (e) Ovaa, H.;
van der Marel, G. A.; van Boom, J. H.; Stragies, R.;
Blechert, S. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge) 2000, 1501. (f)
Weatherhead, G. S.; Ford, J. G.; Alexanian, E. J.;
Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 1828.
Acknowledgements
4. (a) Stragies, R.; Schuster, M.; Blechert, S. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2518. (b) Schu¨rer, S.; Blechert, S.
Synlett 1999, 1879. (c) Stragies, R.; Voigtmann, U.;
Blechert, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 5465.
The authors thank the donors of the Petroleum Research
Foundation, administered by the American Chemical