ticularly challenging because of the electron-withdrawing and
sterically demanding character of the 2′-CF3 group.8,9 Here
we describe the first synthesis of 2′-C-â-trifluoromethyl
ribonucleosides.
Perbenzoylated 2′-C-â-trifluoromethyl-R-D-ribofuranose 3
was synthesized as shown in Scheme 1. Oxidation of 1,3,5-
The Hilbert-Johnson glycosylation reaction of pyrimdines
with peracylated ribose usually proceeds efficiently and
stereoselectively at room temperature to yield the â-anomer.13
However, the glycosylation of bis(trimethylsilyl)uracil with
3 in the presence of either trifluoromethylsilyl trifluo-
romethanesulfonate or SnCl4 at room temperature failed to
give any 2′-C-trifluoromethyluridine. Even after these reac-
tions were refluxed for 1 week in acetonitrile (83 °C), less
than 5% of the nucleoside was obtained, though the â-anomer
4b was formed exclusively. Heating the reaction mixture in
a sealed heavy-wall pressure tube at 120 °C for 3 days in
the presence of trifluoromethylsilyl trifluoromethanesulfonate
improved the yield of nucleoside 4 to 33% and allowed
greater recovery of starting material 3 (57%), but both
anomers were formed (4a/4b ) 4:96).14 At 140 °C for 3
days, the yield of 4 increased to 56% yield, but both the
stereoselectivity (4a/4b ) 14:86) and the recovery of starting
material (13%) decreased. At 180 °C, the reaction went to
completion more rapidly (<24 h); however, both the yield
(21%) and the stereoselectivity decreased significantly (4a/
4b ) 40:60). The stereochemical assignment of 4a and 4b
as the R and â anomers, respectively, was determined by
the 19F-1H NOE experiments. For 4a, we recorded strong
NOE signals for 1′-H (δ 6.87) and 3′-H (δ 6.40) when the
19F nuclei were irradiated. For 4b, we observed strong NOE
signals for 3′-H (δ 6.23) and 6-H (δ 7.50) upon irradiation
of the 19F nuclei.
Scheme 1a
a (a) Dess-Martin periodinane, CH2Cl2, rt, 24 h; (b) (i) CF3SiMe3,
TBAF(5%), THF, rt, 18 h; (ii) TBAF, rt, 10 min; (iii) BzCl, DMAP,
Et3N, CH2Cl2, rt, 5 h; (c) bis(trimethylsilyl)uracil, TMSOTf,
CH3CN, 120 °C, 3 days, 4a/4b ) 4:96.
The glycosylation reaction with 3 required unusually high
temperatures possibly because the CF3 group hinders the
approach of nucleophile9 and destabilizes the intermediate
carbocation at C-1, both by electron withdrawal directly
through the σ framework and by weakening the ability of
the C-2 benzoyl group to donate electron density to C-1.
We explored therefore the possibility of converting the 1-O-
benzoyl derivative 3 to the more reactive 1-bromo derivative.
2,3,5-Tri-O-acyl-D-1-ribofuranosyl halides have been widely
investigated as glycosylating agents for the synthesis of
ribonucleosides and generally react to give â-anomers
exclusively.15 Giese et al. prepared 2,3,5-tri-O-benzoyl-D-1-
ribofuranosyl bromide by treating 1,2,3,5-tetra-O-benzoyl-
R-D-ribofuranose in CH2Cl2 with 33% HBr in acetic acid (0
°C to room temperature).16 In contrast, 3 was completely
unreactive under these conditions, even after the mixture was
stirred at room temperature for 9 days. However, heating 3
in a solution of 30% HBr in acetic acid at 80-85 °C for 5
h installed a bromine atom at C-1 but removed the 2-O-
benzoyl group to give 3,5-di-O-benzoyl-2-C-â-trifluoro-
tri-O-benzoyl-R-D-ribofuranose 1 with Dess-Martin perio-
dinane gave pure 1,3,5-tri-O-benzoyl-R-D-2-ketoribofuranose
2 via a modified procedure in 97% yield.10 Nucleophilic
trifluoromethylation of 2 with Ruppert’s reagent (CF3SiMe3)
catalyzed by TBAF (5%) in THF11 followed by desilylation
with stoichiometric TBAF and treatment with benzoyl
chloride/DMAP/Et3N afforded 1,2,3,5-tetra-O-benzoyl-2-C-
â-trifluoromethyl-R-D-ribofuranose 3 in 73% overall yield.
19F-1H NOE experiments indicated that the trifluoromethyl
nucleophile added stereoselectively to the â-face of the
sugar.12 When the 19F nuclei of the trifluoromethyl group
were irradiated, we observed strong NOE signals for 1-H (δ
7.42) and 3-H (δ 6.17), suggesting that 1-H, 3-H, and the
CF3 group are on the same side of the ribofuranosyl ring.
(8) It has been reported that the reactions at C-1 of carbohydrates via
cationic intermediates are much more difficult to achieve when a trifluo-
romethyl group is attached to C-2. Logothetis, T. A.; Eilitz, U.; Hiller, W.;
Burger, K. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 14023 and references therein.
(9) Seebach argued on the basis of van der Waal hemispheres that a
trifluoromethyl group is between two and three times larger than a methyl
group. See: Seebach, D. Angew Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1990, 29, 1320. Other
assessments suggest that the steric influence of the trifluoromethyl group
is closer to that of an isopropyl group or even a tert-butyl group. See: (a)
Smart, B. E.; Middleton, W. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 4982. (b)
Mosher, H. S.; Stevenot, J. E.; Kimble, D. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 78,
4374. (c) Ramachandran, P. V.; Teodorovic, A. V.; Brown, H. C.
Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 1725.
(13) (a) Niedballa, U.; Vorbruggen, H. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 3654,
3664, 3668, 3672. (b) Niedballa, U.; Vorbruggen, H. J. Org. Chem. 1976,
41, 2084. (c) Vorbruggen, H.; Hofle, G. Chem. Ber. 1981, 114, 1256.
(14) The anomers were separated with difficulty by silica gel chroma-
tography as described in Supporting Information.
(15) (a) Wittenburg, E. Chem. Ber. 1968, 101, 1095. (b) Winkley, M.
W.; Robins, R. K. J. Org. Chem. 1968, 33, 2822. (c) Winkley, M. W.;
Robins, R. K. J. Org. Chem. 1969, 34, 431. (d) Currie, B. L.; Robins, R.
K.; Robins, M. J. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1970, 7, 323. (e) Ozaki, S.;
Watanabe, Y.; Hoshiko, T.; Fujisawa, H.; Uemura, A.; Ohrai, K. Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 1984, 25, 5061. (f). Kissman, H. M.; Pidacks, C.; Baker, B. R.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 18. (g) Kessman, H. M.; Child, R. G.; Weiss,
M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 1185.
(10) Cook, G. P.; Greenberg, M. M. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 4704.
(11) Prakash, G. K. S.; Krishnamurti, R.; Olah, G. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1989, 111, 393.
(12) We synthesized 2′-C-R-trifluoromethyl-â-D-uridine by the nucleo-
philic addition of trimethyltrifluoromethylsilane to 3′,5′-O-(di-tert-butylsi-
1
lyldiyl)-2′-keto-â-D-uridine. Its H, 13C, and 19F spectra are different from
those of the corresponding 2′-C-â-trifluoromethyl-â-D-uridine 10 described
(16) Koch, A.; Lamberth, C.; Wetterich, F.; Giese, B. J. Org. Chem.
1993, 58, 1083.
in this paper.
1026
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 7, 2001