780
S.J.Conway et al./ Bioorg.Med.Chem.Lett.11 (2001) 777±780
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Eli Lilly and Co., the BBSRC
and the MRC for funding this work. We acknowledge
Miss Marie Woolley for the pharmacological
characterization of compound 4.
References and Notes
1. Conn, P. J.; Pin, J.-P. Annu.Rev.Parmacol.Toxicol. 1997,
37, 205.
2. Schoepp, D. D.; Jane, D. E.; Monn, J. A. Neuropharma-
cology 1999, 38, 1431.
3. Watkins, J. C.; Krogsgaard-Larsen, P.; Honore, T. Trends
Pharmacol.Sci. 1990, 11, 25.
Figure 2. Left: Overlay of 6 (yellow) and 10 (blue). Right: Overlay of 6
(yellow) and 9 (red). Optimised in Chem-X and displayed in Chem3D.
4. Watkins, J. C.; Collingridge, G. L. Trends Pharmacol.Sci.
1994, 15, 333.
5. Kemp, M. C.; Roberts, P. J.; Pook, P. C.-K.; Jane, D. E.;
Jones, A. W.; Jones, P. L. St. J.; Sunter, D. C.; Udvarhelyi,
P. M.; Watkins, J. C. Eur.H.Pharmacol±.Mol.Pharmacol.
1994, 226, 187.
6. Jane, D. E.; Pittaway, K.; Sunter, D. C.; Thomas, N. K.;
Watkins, J. C. Neuropharmacology 1995, 34, 851.
7. Jane, D. E.; Pittaway, K.; Sunter, D. C.; Thomas, N. K.;
Tse, H.-W. Phosphorous, Sulfur and Silicon. 1996, 109±110,
313.
8. Jane, D. E.; Thomas, N. K.; Tse, H.-W.; Watkins, J. C.
Neuropharmacology 1996, 35, 1029.
9. Toms, N. J.; Jane, D. E.; Kemp, M. C.; Beding®eld, J. S.;
Roberts, P. J. Br.J.Pharm. 1996, 119, 851.
10. Pellicciari, R.; Costantino, G. Curr.Opin Chem.Biol.
1999, 3, 433.
Both OH groups on the phosphonate moiety may be
needed for optimal binding to the group III mGlu
receptor, as the mono ethyl ester (7) was much less
active than the corresponding diacid (6). Alternatively,
steric hindrance due to the ethyl group may be responsible
for the reduction in activity.
Compound 10, an a-cyclopropyl-substituted analogue
of 6, was surprisingly inactive at concentrations up to
50 mM at group III mGlu receptors. One explanation for
this could be that CPPG and MPPG have dierent
preferred orientations of the glycine unit relative to the
plane of the phenyl ring and therefore the 3-methoxy
substituent on the phenyl ring of 10 may probe excluded
space in the receptor binding site. When energy mini-
mised conformations of compounds 6 and 10 are over-
laid it can be seen that the two phenyl rings are
perpendicular to each other supporting this theory (Fig. 2).
11. (a) Schotten, A. Chem.Ber. 1884, 17, 2544. (b) Baumann,
E. Chem.Ber 1886, 3218.
12. Donnelly, J. A.; Murphy, J. J. J.Chem.Soc.(C)
2596.
1970,
13. Eli Lilly and Co., European Patent EP 621 A10807, 1995.
14. Lu, X.; Zhu, J. Synthesis 1987, 726.
15. Bucherer, H. T.; Lieb, B. A. J.Prakt.Chem. 1934, 141, 5.
16. (a) Michaelis, A.; Kaehne, R. Chemistry.Ber. 1898, 31,
Concluding Remarks
1048. (b) Arbuzov, A. E. J.Russ.Phys.Chem.Soc.
687.
1906, 38,
As the 3-chloro- and 3-methoxy-MPPG analogues (5
and 6, respectively) are at least 100-fold selective for
group III over group II mGlu receptors they are the
most potent selective group III mGlu receptor antago-
nists yet reported. As such they are likely to be useful
tools to elucidate the physiological roles of group III
mGlu receptors in the CNS. Recent work has suggested
that the depressant action of (S)-AP4 on synaptic
transmission in the spinal cord is mediated by mGlu8
receptors2,22 and therefore the compounds described in
this report are likely to be mGlu8 receptor antagonists.
We are currently characterising 5, 6 and 8 on all eight
mGlu receptor subtypes in order to determine their
subtype selectivity.
17. All compounds had correct 1H and 13C NMRs and ele-
mental analysis accurate to within 0.4%.
18. Evans, R. H.; Francis, A. A.; Jones, A. W.; Smith, D. A. S.;
Watkins, J. C. Br.J.Pharmacol. 1982, 75, 65.
19. Long, S. K.; Smith, D. A. S.; Siarey, R. J.; Evans, R. H.
Br.J.Pharmacol. 1990, 100, 850.
20. Jane, D. E.; Jones, P. L. St. J.; Pook, P. C.-K.; Tse, H.-W.;
Watkins, J. C. Br.J.Pharmacol. 1994, 112, 809.
21. Jane, D. E.; Jones, P. L. St. J.; Pook, P. C.-K.; Salt, T. E.;
Sunter, D. C.; Watkins, J. C. Neuropharmacology 1993, 32,
725.
22. Thomas, N. K.; Wright, R. A.; Howson, P. A.; Kingston,
A. E.; Schoepp, D. D.; Jane, D. E. Neuropharmacology 2000,
32, 725.