J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3371-3372
3371
Construction of Persistent Phenoxyl Radical with
Intramolecular Hydrogen Bonding
Toshihide Maki, Yoko Araki, Yukihiro Ishida,
Osamu Onomura, and Yoshihiro Matsumura*
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagasaki UniVersity
1-14 Bunkyo-machi, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan
ReceiVed July 6, 2000
Figure 1. Phenol derivatives 1-4 having the R-alkylamino group at
the ortho or para position.
ReVised Manuscript ReceiVed January 22, 2001
The oxidation of phenols has attracted much attention of
chemists because of its involvement in biologically important
processes.1 One of its particularly interesting points lies in a
formation of persistent phenoxyl radical such as tyrosine phenoxyl
radical (tyrosyl radical) which is elucidated to play significant
roles in a variety of biological systems involving proteins and
enzymes.2-9 Recent extensive research with X-ray crystallography,
high-frequency EPR, and ENDOR spectroscopy provided some
structural information about local protein environments surround-
ing the tyrosyl radical.10a-f The intriguing results imply that
hydrogen bonding between phenol hydrogen and a properly
oriented basic group such as histidine residue regulates the redox
behavior of the tyrosine/tyrosyl radical (Scheme 1).11a-h
Development of proper model compounds may be helpful to
precisely understand such regulation in the biological processes.
However, there have been no precedent model compounds to
show clearly the effect of hydrogen bonding on the redox behavior
of phenols, though some models other than phenols do define
the proton-coupled electron transfer.12 The generation of phenoxyl
radicals by oxidation of phenols commonly accompanies O-H
bond dissociation, leading to an irreversible process as exemplified
Scheme 1. Postulated Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer To
Form Hydrogen-Bonded Tyrosyl Radical with Histidine
Residue
by the oxidation of phenol assisted with intermolecular phenol-
hydrogen-coupled bases.13
On the other hand, a recently reported B3LYP calculation
suggests an involvement of a coupled spontaneous proton transfer
in the oxidation of a phenol-imidazole hydrogen-bonded com-
plex.14 We present herein the first model compound that allows
the reversible electron transfer between phenol and phenoxyl
radical with an assistance of hydrogen bonding.
Our strategy to design the model compound was based on the
following assumption. That is, in a biological system, (a) phenol
moiety may be present in a sterically shielded field to avoid
undesired side reactions such as phenolic coupling15,16 and (b)
phenol hydrogen may be associated with some basic functionality
such as the imidazolyl group. Thus, we planned to synthesize
sterically hindered 2,4,6-trisubstituted phenols having two tert-
butyl groups at the 2 and 4 positions17 and an R-alkylamino group
at the 6 (ortho) position which was aimed for associating phenolic
hydrogen intramolecularly. The reasons why the R-alkylamino
group was selected as a basic functionality are as follows. First,
the group at the ortho position could efficiently associate with
phenolic hydrogen to form a six-membered intermediate. Second,
the intervention of the alkyl group between aromatic ring and
amino group would prevent a conjugation of the amino group
with the aromatic ring, which might largely change the electronic
character of phenols. On the basis of these consideration, the
phenols 1-4 were synthesized (Figure 1).
Cyclic voltammograms (CV’s) of phenols 1-3 in acetonitrile
are shown in Figure 2a-c. Among them, phenol 3 showed a
reversible redox couple on CV (Figure 2c), while phenols 1 and
2 did have partially reversible CV’s (Figure 2a,b) and para-
derivative 4 exhibited an irreversible CV (Figure 2S).
Controlled potential electrolysis of a solution of 3 in 20 mM
acetonitrile or dichloromethane with a divided cell at the anodic
peak potential of 3 afforded a blue species 3•+ that was persistent
enough for spectroscopic characterization even at room temper-
ature, though it gradually decayed over 30 min to give a yellow
solution. The oxidized species was EPR active, though its hfc
was not observed under a variety of conditions (Figure 3).18 The
oxidized species also exhibited typical UV-visible absorption
(1) (a) Steenken, S.; Neta, P. J. Phys. Chem. 1982, 86, 3661-3667 and
references therein. (b) Stubbe, J. A. Annu. ReV. Biochem. 1989, 58, 257-
285.
(2) (a) Babcock, G. T.; Sauer, K. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1973, 325, 483-
503. (b) Blankenship, R. E.; Babcock, G. T.; Warden, J. T.; Sauer, K. FEBS
Lett. 1975, 51, 287-293.
(3) Wittaker, M.-M.; Wittaker, J.-W. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265, 9610-
9613.
(4) Wittaker, M.-M.; Kersten, P.-J.; Nakamura, N.; Sanders-Loehr, J.;
Schweizer, E.-S.; Wittaker, J.-W. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 681-687.
(5) (a) Bender, C. J.; Sahlin, M.; Babcock, G. T.; Barry, B. A.; Chan-
drashekar, T. K.; Salowe, S. P.; Stubbe, J.; Lindstom, B.; Peterson, L.;
Ehrenberg, A.; Sjoberg, B.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 8076-8083. (b)
Allard, P.; Barra, A. L.; Andersson, K. K.; Schmidt, P. P.; Atta, M.; Graslund,
A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 895-896.
(6) Smith, W. L.; Eling, T. E.; Kulumacz, R. J.; Marnett, L. J.; Tsai, A. L.
Biochemistry 1992, 31, 3-7.
(7) Ivancich, A.; Jouve, H. M.; Gaillard, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
12852-12853.
(8) Janes, S. M.; Mu, D.; Wemmes, D.; Smith, A. J.; Kaus, S.; Maltby,
D.; Burlingame, A. L.; Klinman, J. P. Science 1990, 248, 981-987.
(9) Aubert, C.; Brette, K.; Mathis, P.; Eker, A. P. M.; Boussac, A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8659-8660.
(10) (a) Dole, F.; Diner, B. A.; Hoganson, C. W.; Babcock, G. T.; Britt,
R. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11540-11541. (b) Ivancich, A.; Mattioli,
T. A.; Un, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5743-5753. (c) Tommos, C.;
Tang, X.-S.; Warncke, K.; Hoganson, C. W.; Styring, S.; McCracken, J.; Diner,
B. A.; Babcock, G. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 10325-10335. (d) Liu,
A.; Barra, A.-L.; Rubin, H.; Lu, G.; Graslund, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 1974-1978. (e) Ito, N.; Philips, S. E. V.; Stevens, C.; Ogel, Z. B.;
McPherson, M. J.; Keen, J. F.; Yadav, K. D. S.; Knowles, P. F. Nature, 1991,
350, 87-90. (f) Voegtli, W. C.; Khidekel, N.; Baldwin J.; Ley, B. A.;
Bollinger, J. M., Jr.; Rosenzweig, A. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3255-
3261.
(11) (a) Uhlin, U.; Eklund, H. Nature 1994, 370, 533-539. (b) Nordlund,
P.; Ekhund, H. J. Mol. Biol. 1993, 232, 123-164. (c) Sjoberg, B.-M. Structure
1994, 2, 793-796. (d) Siegbahn, P. E. M.; Blomberg, M. R. A.; Crabtree, R.
H. Theor. Chem. Acc. 1997, 97, 289-300. (e) Rova, U.; Goodtzova, K.;
Ingemarson, R.; Behravan, G.; Graslund, A.; Thelander, L. Biochemistry 1995,
34, 4267-4275. (f) Schmidt, P. P.; Rova, U.; Thelander, L.; Graslund, A. J.
Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 21463-21472. (g) van Dam, P. J.; Willems, J.-P.;
Schmidt, P. P.; Potsch, S.; Barra, A.-L.; Hagen, W. R.; Hoffman, B. M.;
Andersson, K. K.; Graslund, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5080-5085.
(h) Un, S.; Atta, M.; Fontecave, M.; Rutherford, A. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1995, 117, 10713-10719.
(13) Biczo´k, L.; Gupta, N.; Linschitz, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
12601-12609.
(14) O’Malley, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11732-11737.
(15) Omura, K. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 6901-6910.
(16) Altwicker, E. R. Chem. ReV. 1967, 67, 475-527.
(17) It is well-known that sterically hindered phenolate ions afford persistent
phenoxyl radicals by one-electron oxidation; see ref 16.
(18) All EPR measurements of 3 gave a similar spectrum to that in Figure
S4: 0.1 to 1.0 mM in frozen CH3CN, C6H6, or CH2Cl2.
(12) Kirby, J. P.; Roberts, J. A.; Nocera, D. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 9230-9236.
10.1021/ja002453+ CCC: $20.00 © 2001 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 03/15/2001