G. Nam et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 11 (2001) 611±614
613
Table 1. PDE 4 inhibitory activity of pyridopyrimidine derivatives 5±8
PDE 4 inhibition (mM) (A)a,13
RBAb, IC5014 (mM) (B)
B/A
Compounds
10 mM
3 mM
1 mM
0.3 mM
0.1 mM
IC50 (mM)
5b
5c
5d
5e
5f
5g
5h
5i
5j
5k
5l
6a
6d
6f
6g
6h
6k
6l
7a
7b
7c
8a
8c
44.6
48.3
40.4
49.0
55.1
32.6
48.0
65.4
36.0
42.4
72.9
35.9
83.7
83.9
38.6
89.7
62.3
59.5
58.7
53.4
63.5
58.0
51.3
ND
67.8
29.9
43
31.3
47.8
44
21.9
30.3
17.4
35.5
41.4
31.5
40.7
38.1
17.4
31.7
60.3
25.6
59.8
63.6
19.3
66.8
50.2
49.3
38.2
39.4
42.1
41.7
41.5
69.1
43.8
NDc
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
54.7
22.6
45.7
57.6
ND
53.2
52.3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
54
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
45.8
29.7
>10
>10
>10
>10
5.75
>10
>10
2.31
>10
>10
0.11
>10
0.43
0.07
>10
0.24
0.95
3.34
4.48
6.11
3.05
5.15
4.75
0.11
1.8
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
23.4
ND
1.01
0.755
ND
0.491
0.95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.18
0.002
30.2
46.4
53.7
23.5
37.6
68.2
28.2
67.6
72.1
35.1
69.7
54.3
57.1
46.7
45.1
49.8
43.5
49.2
72.2
ND
212.73
2.35
10.79
2.05
1.00
SB-207499
Rolipram
1.64
0.001
35
aIsolated from rat liver.
bRolipram binding assay (isolated from rat brain).
cND=not determined.
substrates aorded a mixture of 5 and 615 (Scheme 2).
The pyridopyrimidines 7 and 815 were also prepared by
the reactions of 4 with allyl ethers (Scheme 3).
References and Notes
1. (a) Doherty, A. M. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1999, 3, 466. (b)
Soderling, S. H.; Beavo, J. A. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2000, 12,
174.
2. Palfreyman, M. N.; Souness, J. E.; Ellis, G. P.; Luscombe,
D. K. Progress in Medicinal Chemistry; Elsevier: Amsterdam,
1996; pp 1±52.
Biological Properties
Table 1 shows the PDE 4 inhibitory activity and roli-
pram binding anity of the compounds 5±8. It has been
found that all of the C-4 substituted pyridopyrimidine
derivatives 6 except the benzyl substituted compound 6l
exhibited more potent inhibitory activity than the cor-
responding C-3 substituted compounds 5. The com-
pound 5l having a benzyl group at the C-3 position
exhibited 33 times more potent activity than the C-4
substituted compound 6l. The compounds 7 and 8
showed also moderate PDE 4 inhibitory activities. For
evaluation in high rolipram binding site, we selected ®ve
compounds (5l, 6d, 6f, 6h and 6k), of which the activity
for PDE 4 was submicromolar. Biological data of 6f for
PDE 4 inhibitory activity and rolipram binding anity
is superior to those of SB-207499.9b The inhibitory value
of 6f for PDE 4 is more potent than that of 5l. Never-
theless, the compound 5l showed more promising rolipram
binding assay data and B/A value. This compound 5l is
under further investigations for anti-in¯ammatory eect
and inhibitory activity for TNF-a production.
3. Mark, A. G. Drugs 2000, 59, 193.
4. (a) Lombardo, L. J. Curr. Pharm. Des. 1995, 1, 255. (b)
Torphy, T. J.; Livi, G. P.; Christensen, S. B. Drug News
Perspect. 1993, 6, 203.
5. (a) Terrett, N. K.; Bell, A. S.; Brown, D.; Ellis, P. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 1996, 6, 1819. (b) Drugs Future 1997, 22,
138.
6. Xu, R. X.; Hassel, A. M.; Vanderwall, D.; Lambert, M. H.;
Holmes, W. D.; Luther, M. A.; Rocque, W. J.; Milburn, M. V.;
Zhao, Y.; Ke, H.; Nolte, R. T. Science 2000, 288, 1822.
7. (a) Schwabe, U.; Miyake, M.; Ohga, Y.; Daly, J. Mol.
Pharmacol. 1976, 12, 900. (b) Schneider, H. H.; Schmiechen,
R.; Brezinski, M.; Seidler, J. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1986, 127, 105.
8. (a) Reviews: The Year's Drug News 1995, 152.. (b) Staord,
J. A.; Fildman, P. L. Annu. Rep. Med. Chem. 1996, 31, 71. (c)
Piaz, V. D.; Giovannoni, M. P. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 35,
463. (d) Norman, P. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 1998, 8, 1529.
9. (a) Drugs Future 1998, 23, 607. (b) Christensen, S. B.;
Guider, A.; Forster, C. J. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 821.
10. (a) Alvarez, R.; Wilhelm, R. S.; Shelton, E. R.; Daniels,
D. V.; Yang, D.; Kelly, K.; Eglen, R. M. Can. J. Physiol.
Pharmacol. 1994, 72, 510. (b) Wilhelm, R. S.; Chin, R. L.;
Devens, B. H.; Alverez, R. Int. Pat. Appl. WO 93 19068. (c)
Chem. Abstr. 1994, 122, 164123.
Acknowledgements
11. Lowe, J. A., III; Archer, R. L.; Chapin, D. S.; Cheng, J. B.;
Helweg, D.; Johnson, J. L.; Koe, B. K.; Lebel, L. A.; Moore,
P. F.; Nielsen, J. A.; Russo, L. L.; Shirley, J. T. J. Med. Chem.
1991, 34, 624.
This work was ®nancially supported by Cheiljedang
corp, Brain Korea 21 program and MOST (2N20120).