D. J. Aitken et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 11 (2001) 659±661
661
to the putative bioactive conformation of NK1 receptor
antagonists. From these calculations, it would appear
reasonable to predict that structure 2 could behave as
an antagonist, but perhaps not with great potency. This
is indeed borne out by the pharmacology results.
3. Harrison, T.; Williams, B. J.; Swain, C. J.; Ball, R. G.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1994, 4, 2545.
4. Williams, B. J.; Teall, M.; McKenna, J.; Harrison, T.;
Swain, C. J.; Cascieri, M. A.; Sadowski, S.; Strader, C.; Baker,
R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1994, 4, 1903.
5. Swain, C. J.; Cascieri, M. A.; Owens, A. P.; Saari, W.;
Sadowski, S.; Strader, C.; Teall, M.; VanNiel, M. B.; Wil-
liams, B. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1994, 4, 2161.
6. Owens, A. P.; Williams, B. J.; Harrison, T.; Swain, C. J.;
Baker, R.; Sadowski, S.; Cascieri, M. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 1995, 5, 2761.
7. Takeuchi, Y.; Shands, E. F. B.; Beusen, D. D.; Marshall,
G. R. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 3609.
8. For leading references on the conformational restrictions
imposed by the presence of a cyclopropane ring, see: Burgess,
K.; Ho, K.-K.; Pettitt, B. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 54.
9. Aitken, D. J. Pharm. Sci. 1997, 3, 319.
Similarly, reduced binding anity was also observed for
another non-rigid cyclopropane-containing analogue
11, this time a hybrid between the CP-99,994 diamine
structure and the ether-amine L-733,060. The previous
synthetic scheme was adapted easily for the preparation
of this compound from intermediate 6, via carbamate 10
(Scheme 2). Pharmacological evaluation11 of (Æ)-11
showed relatively poor receptor binding anity, with
Ki=620Æ30 nM.
10. Data for compound 2: NMR (CDCl3): dH 0.44 (1H, m),
0.53±0.72 (3H, br m), 2.02 (1H, br s), 2.30 (3H, s), 3.67 (1H, s),
3.73 (1H, d, J=12.8), 3.81 (3H, s), 3.99 (1H, d, J=12.8), 5.20
(1H, br s), 6.83 (1H, d, J=7.6), 6.89 (1H, t, J=7.6), 7.18±7.37
(7H, m); dC 11.1 (t), 11.7 (t), 35.3 (q), 43.8 (s), 46.4 (t), 55.3 (q),
68.3 (d), 110.3, 120.7, 127.2, 127.7, 128.2, 129.6 (eachd),
129.4, 141.2, 157.6 (eachs); IR (cm À1): 3533, 3415, 3400 br;
MS(IC): m/z 297 [MH]+; Analytical sample as dihydro-
chloride; mp 147 ꢀC (CHCl3±iPr2O). Anal. calcd for
C19H24N2O 2HCl H2O: C, 58.91; H, 7.29; N, 7.23. Found: C,
59.14; H, 7.09; N, 6.99.
11. Inhibition of [3H][Pro9]-SP was measured using hNK1
receptors expressed in CHO cells, as previously described:
Sagan, S.; Chassaing, G.; Pradier, L.; Lavielle, S. J. Pharma-
col. Exp. Ther. 1996, 276, 1039.
12. Molecular modelling studies were performed on a Silicon
Graphics SGI Power Indigo2 R8000 workstation, using
SYBYL 6.5 software package (Tripos Associates Inc., St
Louis, USA). Structures of CP-99,994 and (S)-2 were built
within SYBYL, the potential types and binding parameters of
the cyclopropane carbons of the latter being de®ned using the
semi-empirical GEOMOS method (Rinaldi, D.; Hoggan, P. E.;
Cartier, A. GEOMOS, QCPE 584). The energy of the mole-
cules was calculated in vacuo withthe Tripos force ®eld Max-
imin2, and minimised directly to ensure the system was in a
low energy state. An elevated temperature of 800 K was
applied for 1000 fs then was reduced to 0 K for 2500 fs. This
process was repeated for 100 cycles so that multiple con-
formations could be generated. Conformers devoid of kinetic
energy were retained, and results were interpreted graphically
for eachmolecule.
In conclusion, this work shows that the above-noted
non-rigid diamine analogues of the CP-99,994-derived
NK1 antagonist family behave similarly to non-rigid
amine-ether derivatives in that they possess diminished
binding anity compared with their heterocyclic pre-
cursors, and demonstrates that Marshall's recent phar-
macophore model may have useful predictive value.
.
.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to A. S. Phimmanao and L.
Chhiv for technical assistance and to Dr. S. Sagan
(CNRS-UMR 7613, Universite Paris VI) for pharma-
cology studies. S.O. thanks the Rectorat des Universites
de Paris for a grant. This work was supported by the
CNRS through AIP funding (to D.J.A.).
References and Notes
1. Lowe, J. A., III; Drozda, S. E.; Snider, R. M.; Longo, K. P.;
Zorn, S. H.; Morrone, J.; Jackson, E. R.; McLean, S.; Bryce,
D. K.; Bordner, J.; Nagahisa, A.; Kanai, Y.; Suga, O.; Tsu-
chiya, M. J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35, 2591.
2. Desai, M. C.; Lefkowitz, S. L.; Thadeio, P. F.; Longo,
K. P.; Snider, R. M. J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35, 4911.