Scheme 1. Synthesis and Isolation of Phosphate Anion 2a
a (a) I2, H5IO6, MeOH, 70 °C, 4 (83%); (b) CuI, RSO2Na, DMF, 110 °C, 5a (R ) p-Tol, 88%), 5b (R ) (+)-camphor-10-, 85%); (c)
5a, BBr3 (5.0 equiv), CH2Cl2, 3 (R ) p-Tol, 93%); (d) PCl5 (0.33 equiv), CH2Cl2, then DMF, 25 °C; Bu3N, 25 °C, [Bu3NH][2]; (e)
malachite green chromatography (SiO2, CH2Cl2), [6][2] (two steps, 63%).
behavior was further proved by the synthesis of 4,5-bis((+)-
anions, while only one was expected. This result was
furthermore surprising as only one set of signals correspond-
ing to anion 2 could be observed in H NMR. Further
camphor-10-sulfonyl)veratrol, whereas the atropisomers can
1
1
be simply monitored by H NMR.3
4,5-Bis(p-toluenesulfonyl)catechol 3, necessary for the
making of anion 2, was prepared in three steps and good
overall yield (Scheme 1). From veratrol, diiodination with
I2/H5IO6 proceeded smoothly to give 4 (83%).4 Bis-sulfo-
nylation of 4 by a Cu(I)-mediated reaction with sodium
p-toluenesulfinate resulted,5 after optimization, in the syn-
characterization of salt [6][2] by mass spectrometry (ES-
MS) confirmed its structural integrity. The four signals in
31P NMR could not be explained by the presence of four
different chemical compounds and had to be solely attributed
to compound 2. It appeared to us that this situation for 2
was somewhat reminiscent of what is usually noticed for
tris(bidentate) octahedral complexes made of nonplanar
chelate rings, such as [Co(en)3]3+. As first noted by Corey
and Bailar,7 when chelate rings adopt chiral conformations
(δ and λ), four diastereomers, always appearing in enantio-
meric pairs, are generated as a result of the inherent chirality
of the octahedral complexes (∆ and Λ): ∆(δδδ)/Λ(λλλ),
∆(δδλ)/Λ(λλδ), ∆(δλλ)/Λ(λδδ), ∆(λλλ)/Λ(δδδ).8 However,
for 2, the planarity of the chelating catechol rings was not
compatible with such an explanation. If chiral conformations
were to be the source of the four signals observed in 31P
NMR, they would have to result from the spatial arrangement
of the sulfonyl substituents.
1
thesis of 5a (88%). H NMR analyses of 5a did not reveal
any particularity except a signal broadening, which could
only be understood in the course of this study. Deprotection
of 5a using classical conditions (BBr3, CH2Cl2) led to the
4,5-bis(p-toluenesulfonyl)catechol 3 in 93% yield.
Anion 2 was prepared by addition of 3 to PCl5 in CH2Cl2.
Concentration in vacuo and addition of DMF and then nBu3N
afforded the [nBu3NH][2] salt along with minor amounts of
degradation products (Scheme 1). Purification of the crude
reaction mixture was effected by the addition of malachite
green and subsequent chromatography (SiO2, CH2Cl2) to give
the bis(dimethylaminophenyl)phenylmethinium (6) salt, [6]-
[2], in 63% yield (two steps).6
It was indeed highly probable that, to minimize strong
dipolar interactions, the ortho sulfonyl groups would adopt
an “up-and-down” arrangement with regard to the aromatic
plane (Figure 3). This disposition of the sulfonyl groups
imparts a C2-symmetry and thus the adoption by the ortho
substituents of two enantiomeric helical conformations (δ
Characterization of salt [6][2] by 31P NMR was, at first
glance, puzzling. Four signals (DMSO-d6, δ -76.7, -77.3,
-77.5, and -78.2, Figure 2) were observed in the -80 ppm
region characteristic of the tris(benzenediolato)phosphate
(2) See Lacour et al. (last reference of footnote 1) and the following:
Lacour, J.; Jodry, J. J.; Ginglinger, C.; Torche-Haldimann, S. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 2379-2380. Lacour, J.; Goujon-Ginglinger, C.;
Torche-Haldimann, S.; Jodry, J. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3695-
3697. Ratni, H.; Jodry, J. J.; Lacour, J.; Ku¨ndig, E. P. Organometallics
2000, 19, 3997-3999.
(3) For a general overview of atropisomerism, see: Eliel, E. L.; Wilen,
S. H. Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds; John Wiley & Sons: New
York, 1994; pp 1142-1155.
(4) Suzuki, H.; Nakamura, K.; Goto, R. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1966, 39,
128-131.
(5) Suzuki, H.; Abe, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 6239-6242.
(6) Lacour, J.; Barche´chath, S.; Jodry, J. J.; Ginglinger, C. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1998, 39, 567-570.
(7) Corey, E. J.; Bailar, J. C., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81, 2620-
2629.
(8) Von Zelewsky, A. Stereochemistry of Coordination Compounds; John
Wiley & Sons: Chichester, U.K., 1996.
Figure 2. 31P NMR (DMSO-d6, 162 MHz, parts) of [6][2].
1408
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 9, 2001