372
Vol. 56, No. 3
The product was stored in the refrigerator to give product 0.34 g. Yield:
30%. mp: 136—140 °C. Rf 0.5 (n-hexane). 1H-NMR (CDCl3) d: 7.91—7.83
(6H, m, ArH), 7.78—7.73 (3H, m, ArH), 7.67—7.63 (6H, m, ArH), 5.44
(2H, d, Jꢃ13.8 Hz, CH2), 3.85 (2H, d, Jꢃ7.2 Hz, OCH2), 1.36—1.32 (1H,
m, CH), 1.15—1.06 (8H, m, CH2), 0.82 (3H, t, Jꢃ6.9 Hz, CH3), 0.72 (3H, t,
exhibit evident antioxidative activity that enables them to be
potential antioxidative. Among these compounds, 5a, 5b, and
6a conferred marked MMP-1 inhibitory activity in col-
lagenolytic assay and caseinolytic zymographic analysis. We
found that the free thiol group is important for marked free Jꢃ7.5 Hz, CH3).
General Procedure to Obtain Compounds 5a and 5b Dry nitrogen
radical scavenging activity and the disulfide linkage may be
important for MMP-1 inhibition. These observations also
suggest that the free radical scavenging and MMP inhibitory
activities of these compounds are conveyed by different
mechanisms. Despite that there is no direct correlation be-
tween free radical scavenging and MMP-1 inhibitory activi-
ties, our studies reveal structure features for the further
development of effective compounds as sunscreening and
MMP-1 inhibitors that may have potential applications. Fur-
ther experiments evaluating the UV-protective effects and ac-
tion mechanism of these compounds in normal cells or mice
are currently in progress.
gas was passed through the apparatus for 15 min. Into the flask was placed a
suspension of 4 or triethyl phophonoacetate (TPA) (20 mmol) in THF
(50 ml), and the 2 (10 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was main-
tained under a positive pressure from dry nitrogen and was stirred, while
being cooled in an ice-water bath, for 20 min. 60% NaH (15 mmol) was
added in a single portion. It was stirred for an additional 20 min in the ice-
water bath. The bath was then removed, and the reaction mixture was al-
lowed to return to room temperature. The reaction mixture was then allowed
to stand at room temperature for 6 h. The reaction mixture was gravity fil-
tered while it was still warm. The precipitate was washed with additional dry
THF. The filtrate was collected and the solvent was removed by vacuum
evaporation to oil. The resultant oil was purified by chromatography on sil-
ica gel (n-hexane/EtOAcꢃ2/1) to give product.
2,2ꢀ-Dithiobiscinnamic Acid Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Ester (5a): Yield: 45%. Rf
0.4 (n-hexane/EtOAcꢃ2/1). 1H-NMR (CDCl3) d: 8.18 (1H, d, Jꢃ15.9 Hz,
CH), 7.55—7.32 (4H, m, Ar-H), 7.30—7.25 (4H, m, Ar-H), 6.36 (1H, d,
Experimental
General Melting points (mp) were taken on a BUCHI 530 apparatus Jꢃ15.9 Hz, CH), 4.12 (2H, d, Jꢃ5.7 Hz, OCH2, each), 1.57—1.43 (1H, m,
and are uncorrected. Merck Art No. 105554 plates precoated with Silica gel
CH, each), 1.42—1.24 (8H, m, CH2, each), 0.94—0.87 (6H, m, CH3, each).
60 containing fluorescent indicator were used for thin-layer chromatography, 13C-NMR (CDCl3) d: 166.23, 141.28, 136.15, 134.71, 132.76, 129.67,
and Silica gel 60 (Merck Art No 109385, 230—400 mesh) was employed for 127.64, 126.76, 120.19, 66.54, 41.36, 38.346, 29.94, 28.34, 22.29, 13.28,
column chromatography. Evaporations were carried out at ꢅ50 °C using a
10.34. IR (KBr) cmꢇ1: 1672. UV lmax (CH2Cl2) nm (log e): 359 (1.0). FAB-
rotary evaporator at reduced pressure (water aspirator). 1H- and 13C-NMR
MS m/z: 583 (MꢈH)ꢈ. Anal. Calcd for C34H46O4S2: C, 70.06; H, 7.95.
spectra were obtained with a Varian 300 NMR spectrometer at 300 and Found: C, 70.39; H, 7.99.
75 MHz, respectively. Where necessary, deuterium exchange experiments
were used to obtained proton shift assignments. Mass spectra were recorded
2,2ꢀ-Dithiobiscinnamic Acid Diethyl Ester (5b): Yield: 73%. Rf 0.2 (n-
hexane/EtOAcꢃ2/1). 1H-NMR (CDCl3) d: 8.09 (1H, d, Jꢃ15.9 Hz, CH),
on a JEOL J.M.S-300 spectrophotometer. Analytical samples were dried 7.56—7.51 (4H, m, Ar-H), 7.26—7.29 (4H, m, Ar-H), 6.29 (1H, d,
under reduced pressure at 78 °C in the presence of P2O5 for at least 12 h un-
Jꢃ15.9 Hz, CH), 4.26 (2H, q, Jꢃ7.2 Hz, CH2, each), 1.33 (3H, t, Jꢃ7.2 Hz,
less otherwise specified. Elemental analyses were obtained using a Perkin- CH3, each). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) d: 165.90, 140.53, 136.27, 135.61, 131.91,
Elmer 2400 Elemental Analyzer.
129.95, 128.30, 126.69, 120.39, 59.92, 13.64. IR (KBr) cmꢇ1: 1672. UV
lmax (CH2Cl2) nm (log e): 359 (1.0). EI-MS m/z: 414 (Mꢈ). Anal. Calcd for
C22H22O4S2: C, 63.74; H, 5.35. Found: C, 63.80; H, 5.40.
2-Mercaptobenzyl Alcohol (1) The suspension of LiAlH4 (9.8 g,
260 mmol) in dry tetrahydrofuran (THF) (80 ml) was added dropwise to a
solution of 2-mercaptobenzoic acid (16.0 g, 104 mmol) in dry THF (120 ml).
General Procedure to Obtain Compounds 6a and 6b A mixture of 2-
After stirring at room temperature for 4 h, 10% H2SO4 (100 ml) and ethyl ac- mercaptobenzoic acid (60 mmol), 2-ethyl-hexanol or ethanol (120 ml) and
etate (120 ml) were added carefully and the reaction mixture was filtered. concentrated sulfuric acid (3 ml) was heated under reflux for 24 h. The sol-
The residue was washed with ethyl acetate (3ꢆ40 ml). The filtrate and wash- vent of reaction mixture was removed and the residue was partitioned be-
ings were combined, dried with magnesium sulfate, and concentrated under
tween EtOAc and saturated NaHCO3. The organic layer was collected,
reduced pressure to give an oily product which became solid after cooling. washed with brine and concentrated. The residue was purified by chromatog-
Crystallization with a mixture of n-hexane and ethyl acetate, gave pure com-
raphy silica gel (n-hexane/EtOAcꢃ9/1) to give oil product.
2,2ꢀ-Dithiobisbenzoic Acid Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Ester (6a): Yield: 52%. Rf
pound (8.0 g, 55%), mp: 31—32 °C, (lit.13) 31—32 °C).
2,2ꢀ-Dithiodibenzaldehyde (2) A mixture of pyridine chlorochromate 0.7 (n-hexane/EtOAcꢃ9/1). 1H-NMR (CDCl3) d: 8.06 (2H, d, Jꢃ7.8 Hz,
(36.0 g, 167.0 mmol) in dry dichloromethane (150 ml) under nitrogen atmo-
sphere was added dropwise to the mixture of 1 (11.7 g, 84 mmol) in dry
dichloromethane (150 ml). After stirring at room temperature for 4 h, the re-
ArH), 7.77 (4H, d, Jꢃ8.1 Hz, ArH), 7.41 (4H, t, Jꢃ7.2 Hz, ArH), 7.24 (4H,
t, Jꢃ7.2 Hz, ArH), 4.31 (4H, q, Jꢃ2.1 Hz, CH2), 1.54—1.52 (1H, m, CH,
each), 1.49—1.33 (8H, m, CH2, each), 0.94—0.91 (3H, m, CH3, each). 13C-
action mixture was filtered. The residue was washed with dichloromethane NMR (CDCl3) d: 166.19, 139.95, 132.39, 130.84, 127.39, 125.44, 124.93,
(3ꢆ40 ml) and ether (40 ml). The filtrate and washings were combined, and 67.36, 38.35, 29.99, 28.36, 23.41, 22.3, 13.31, 10.39. IR (KBr) cmꢇ1: 1674.
then concentrated to give the solid product. Crystallization with ethanol gave UV lmax (CH2Cl2) nm (log e): 358 (1.0). EI-MS m/z: 530 (Mꢈ). Anal. Calcd
pure compound (6.1 g, 52%), mp: 145—148 °C, (lit.13) 145—148 °C).
for C30H42O4S2: C, 67.89; H, 7.98. Found: C, 68.05; H, 7.99.
Bromo-acetic 2-Ethyl-hexyl Ester (3) In a two-necked round bottom
flask equipped with
72 mmol) and p-TsOH (8.6 g, 45 mmol) were added to a solution of bro-
moacetic acid (8.3 g, 60 mmol) in toluene (200 ml). After stirring under re-
2,2ꢀ-Dithiobisbenzoic Acid Diethyl Ester (6b): Yield: 67%. Rf 0.7 (n-
a
Dean–Stark apparatus 2-ethyl-hexanol (9.4 g, hexane/EtOAcꢃ7/1). 1H-NMR (CDCl3) d: 8.07 (2H, d, Jꢃ1.5 Hz, ArH),
7.74 (4H, d, Jꢃ0.9 Hz, ArH), 7.43—7.22 (4H, m, ArH), 4.44 (2H, q,
Jꢃ7.5 Hz, CH2, each), 1.44 (3H, t, Jꢃ1.2 Hz, CH3, each). 13C-NMR
flux for 18 h, toluene was removed under vacuum. The residue dissolved in (CDCl3) d: 165.98, 139.90, 132.32, 130.82, 127.50, 125.51, 124.89, 60.83,
ethyl acetate (3ꢆ40 ml) was washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3
13.61. IR (KBr) cmꢇ1: 1672. UV lmax (CH2Cl2) nm (log e): 357 (1.0). EI-
(30 ml), water (2ꢆ30 ml), brine (2ꢆ30 ml), dried over MgSO4 and con- MS m/z: 362 (Mꢈ). Anal. Calcd for C18H18O4S2: C, 59.65; H, 5.01. Found:
centrated. Purification by column chromatography on silica (n- C, 59.68; H, 5.1.
hexane/EtOAcꢃ9/1) afforded a colorless oil 13.5 g, 89%. Rf 0.35 (n-
General Procedure to Obtain Compounds 7a and 7b Dry nitrogen
hexane/EtOAcꢃ9/1). 1H-NMR (CDCl3) d: 4.03 (2H, d, Jꢃ6.0 Hz, OCH2), gas was passed through the apparatus for 15 min. The flask was charged with
3.78 (2H, s, CH2), 1.54—1.52 (1H, m, CH), 1.12—1.26 (8H, m, CH2), 6a or 6b (4.1 mmol) and freshly distilled THF (60 ml). To this well-stirred
0.88—0.85 (6H, m, CH3).
solution, maintained at room temperature was added a 1.25 M solution of
2-Ethylhexyloxycarbonyltriphenylphosphonium Bromide (4) Tri-
lithium tri-tert-butoxyaluminohydride (LTBA) (8.2 mmol) in THF by a sy-
phenylphosphine (0.84 g, 3.2 mmol) was dissolved in benzene or toluene ringe needle over a 15-min period. The resulting clear mixture was stirred
(15 ml). 3 (3.8 ml, 26 mmol) was added to the solution. The mixture was for an additional period of 4 h. Water (1 ml) was added dropwise to destroy
swirled well and almost immediately became cloudy. White precipitate
the excess hydride. The mixture was acidified by the addition of 6.0 N hy-
formed within 10 min. The mixture was allowed to stand at room tempera- drochloric acid to attain a pH of ꢅ3. The organic phase was separated, and
ture for at least 4 h before collecting the precipitate. The solid was filtered, the aqueous phase was extracted with ethyl acetate (3ꢆ30 ml). The com-
washed with toluene, then with hexanes, and allowed to dry over vacuum. bined extracts were washed with saturated brine (30 ml) and dried with
The product was not purified further but used directly for Wittig reactions. MgSO4. Removal of ethyl acetate solvents on a rotary evaporator followed