K. Ghosh et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 6557–6561
6561
Hm
-
PF6
N
H
Ho'
Hb
N
Hp
O
N
PF6
O
Hb
-
N
Ho
Ha
1
Hc
Figure 10. Partial 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3 containing 2% CD3CN) spectra of (a) 1 and its 1:1 complexes with (b) H2PO4 and (c) isophthalate.
ꢀ
the excimer emission of 1 at longer wavelength was completely
destroyed in aq CH3CN and no measurable change in monomer
emission was observed during titration with the phosphate salts
(see Supplementary data). This suggested weak or no interactions
of 1 in aq CH3CN.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (Figures showing the change in absorption
and fluorescence spectra and the Job plots of receptor 1 in presence
of the guests, Binding constant curves, Change in emission of 1 in
presence of different phosphate salts in aq CH3CN are available)
associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at
However, the expected strong interaction between 1 and
ꢀ
H2PO4 in CDCl3 containing 2% CD3CN was further confirmed by
1H NMR (Fig. 10). As shown in Figure 10, the amide proton Ha,
pyridinium proton Ho of 1 underwent downfield chemical shifts
of 0.97 and 0.28 ppm, respectively, in the presence of equivalent
References and notes
amount of H2PO4ꢀ. During interaction the pyridinium proton Ho
0
moved to the downfield direction (Dd = 0.26). Similarly, the pyrid-
1. Chemical Sensors and Biosensors for Medical and Biological Applications;
Spichiger-Keller, U. S., Ed.; Wiley: Weinheim, Germany, 1998.
2. Steed, J. W. Chem. Commun. 2006, 2637.
3. Martinez-Manez, R.; Sancenon, F. Chem. Rev. 2003, 13, 4419.
4. Caltagirone, C.; Gale, P. A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 520.
5. Gale, P. A.; García-Garrido, S. E.; Garric, J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 151.
6. Sessler, J. L.; Barkey, N. M.; Pantos, G. D.; Lynch, V. M. New J. Chem. 2007, 31,
646.
7. Vance, D. H.; Czarnik, A. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 9397.
8. Lankshear, M. D.; Beer, P. D. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250, 3142.
9. Blondean, P.; Benet-Buchholz, J.; de Mendoza, J. New J. Chem. 2007, 31, 736. and
references cited therein.
10. Ghosh, K.; Adhikari, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 8165. and references cited
therein.
inium proton Hp, which appeared at 7.92 ppm underwent a down-
field chemical shift of 0.13 ppm upon complexation suggesting its
involvement in the binding process. This is evident from the
molecular modeling (Fig. 1) where one of the binding arms of 1
provides Hp toward the cavity for complexation. A similar findings
in 1H NMR were observed when equivalent amount of isophthalate
was added to the solution of 1
DdH = 0.24, DdH = 0.36, DdH = 0.36,
0
a o
o
and dH = 0.09; Fig. 10c). During the interaction of 1 with the
D
p
guests, the signal for Hb protons of 1 was split into two doublets
suggesting a conformational change for which they become chem-
ically non-equivalent.
11. Chang, K.-J.; Moon, D.; Lah, M. S.; Jeong, K.-S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44,
7926.
12. Gale, P. A. Chem. Commun. 2005, 3761.
In conclusion, we have designed a new type of dihydrogenphos-
phate receptor with unique recognition and sensing properties. It
provides well-defined structure for efficient and selective com-
13. Schmuck, C.; Machon, U. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 4385.
14. Yoon, J.; Kim, S. K.; Singh, N. J.; Kim, K. S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35, 355.
15. Jeong, K. –S.; Cho, Y. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 3279.
16. Wallance, K. J.; Belcher, W. J.; Turner, D. R.; Syed, K. F.; Steed, J. W. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 9699.
17. Ghosh, K.; Sarkar, A. R.; Masanta, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 8725.
18. Ghosh, K.; Sarkar, A. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 85.
19. Gong, W.; Hiratani, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 5655.
20. Shin-Ichi, K.; Yuichi, H.; Namiko, K.; Yumihiko, Y. Chem. Commun. 2005,
1720.
ꢀ
plexation of H2PO4 with 1:1 binding stoichiometry. Although
the sensing and binding of 1 with isophthalate are not extremely
strong in the present study, the binding selectivity is high in com-
parison with isomeric and other dicarboxylate anions. Addition of
H2PO4ꢀ, HSO4ꢀ, and isophthalate to the solution of 1 in CHCl3 con-
taining 2% CH3CN causes change in monomer emission of anthra-
cene followed by appearance of excimer. This excimer emission
21. Ghosh, K.; Saha, I.; Patra, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 2392. and references
cited therein.
ꢀ
is diagnostic to recognize H2PO4 from other anions in the present
22. Dian-Shun, G.; Zhi-Peng, L.; Jian-Ping, M.; Ru-Qi, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48,
1221.
study. The high affinity and selectivity of this simple fluororeceptor
are due to the combined effects of semi-rigid structures, charge–
charge interactions, and the involvement of both N–Hꢁ ꢁ ꢁO and C–
Hꢁ ꢁ ꢁO hydrogen bonds.
23. Mp 225 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz): d 11.07 (s, NH, 2H), 8.80 (s, 4H), 8.70
(s, 2H), 8.38 (br s, 2H), 8.34 (d, 4H, J = 6.4 Hz), 8.20 (d, 4H, J = 7 Hz), 7.95 (br s,
2H), 7.64–7.58 (m, 10H), 7.45–7.39 (m, 4H), 7.11 (br s, 2H), 6.91 (s, 4H); 13C
NMR (DMSO-d6, 100 MHz): 174.0, 144.7, 143.5, 143.0, 139.3, 138.8, 138.5,
136.5, 136.4, 136.0, 135.6, 134.8, 134.5, 133.4, 133.1, 132.7, 132.5, 130.5, 127.3,
125.3, 61.7; FTIR:
m
cmꢀ1 (KBr): 3375, 3062, 1665, 1627, 1591, 1556, 1499; m/z
Acknowledgments
(ES+): 921.6 [MꢀPF6ꢀ]+, 775.7 [Mꢀ1–2PF6ꢀ]+.
24. AM1 calculation was performed using minimal valance basis as STO 3G in
ArgusLab 4.0.1, copyright (c) 1997–2004 Mark Thompson and Planaria
We thank CSIR, Government of India for financial support. A.R.S.
thanks the University of Kalyani for providing a university research
fellowship. K.G. thanks DST, Government of India for providing
facilities in the department under FIST program.
25. Xu, Z.; Kim, S.; Lee, K.-H.; Yoon, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 3797.
26. Chou, P. T.; Wu, G. R.; Wei, C. Y.; Cheng, C. C.; Chang, C. P.; Hung, F. T. J. Phys.
Chem. B. 2002, 104, 7818.