B. Hu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 11 (2001) 981–984
983
ovary (CHO) cells expressing the human b3-, b2-, and
b1-ARs6 and the results are summarized in Tables 1and
2. The olefinic thiazolidinedione 8a was found to be as
potent (b3 EC50=0.006 mM, IA=1.03)7 and selective
(96-fold vs b2 and 492-fold vs b1) as 1. The correspond-
ing olefinic pseudothiohydantoin 8b and hydantion 8c,
although having comparable agonist activity, were less
selective against the b2 (61- and 18-fold, respectively)
and b1 (113- and 38-fold, respectively) receptors. The
reduced alkyl analogues 10a and 10b showed reduced b3
potency (EC50=0.09 and 0.23 mM, respectively). Repla-
cement of thiazolidinedione with oxadiazolidinedione
(17) gave good potency (EC50=0.02 mM, IA=1.0) at
the b3 receptor and increased selectivity against the b1
(259-fold) and b2 receptors (745-fold).
selectivity of 20d and 20e, two more series of thiazolidi-
nones with phenoxypropanolamines2 on the left-hand
side were synthesized. In contrast to phenethanolamines
20a–e, all of the tested phenoxypropanolamines (22 and
23) had no measurable b2 agonist activity. For both the
guanidine and piperidine series, many potent b3-ago-
nists were identified, including compounds with a car-
bostyril (22b and 23b), benzimidazolone (22a and 23a),
or 4-OH-3-methylsulfonamide phenyl (23e) substituent.
However, only benzimidazolones (22a and 23a) dis-
played a good b3 agonist selectivity profile. The guani-
dines with a phenoxy (22c) or 4-hydroxyphenoxy (22d)
substituent had low potency at the b3 receptors with
EC50’s of 0.94 and 0.4 mM, respectively.
Selected compounds with good agonist activity/selectiv-
ity profiles were examined in b1 and b2-AR binding
assays (Table 3).9 Benzimidazolone 22a exhibited strong
antagonist activity against both b1 and b2 receptors with
binding constants (Ki) of 0.0038 mM for b2 and
0.0072 mM for b1. In contrast, compounds 13 and 17
exhibited low binding affinity (Ki >2 mM) for both b2
and b1 receptors, suggesting good selectivity for the b3
receptor.
Results from our earlier chemical series demonstrated
that introduction of a carboxylic acid group on the
right-hand side of 2-(1-phenyl-piperidin-4-ylamino)-
ethanol b3 agonists would enhance selectivity while
maintaining the b3 agonist activity.8 Introducing a car-
boxylic acid group to 1 did enhance the b2 selectivity.
However, the activity of 13 was decreased 3-fold relative
to 1.
A variety of thiazolidinones with different substitution
on the thiazolidinone ring were tested, some of which
are shown in Tables 1and 2. Thiazolidinones with a
cyanamide (20a), hydroxylamine (20b) or 4-amino-1-
benzylpiperidine (20c) substituent were generally very
potent at the b3 receptor (with EC50’s of single digits
nM and maximal activation 83–122% of that evoked by
isoproterenol), however, they were not very selective
against both the b2 and b1 receptors. Further modifica-
tion of the substitution on the right-hand side of thia-
zolidinones led to guanidine 20d and piperidine 20e,
which were found to be potent at the b3 receptor (with
EC50’s of 0.003 and 0.009 mM, respectively) and moder-
ately selective (73- to 423-fold) against the b2 and b1
receptors. In view of the potent activity and modest
The ability of b3 agonist 17 to treat or inhibit disorders
related to obesity or type II diabetes was confirmed in
an in vivo procedure,10 which measured thermogenesis
in human b3 AR-transgenic mice (Tg mice). Adminis-
tered 10 mg/kg (ip) to Tg mice, 17 produced a sig-
nificant effect (30Æ8%) in thermogenesis.
There have been a number of reports that the thiazoli-
dinediones are high-affinity peroxisome proliferator-
activated receptor (PPARg) agonists, and there is a
significant positive relationship between the in vitro
Table 2. Comparison of b3-AR agonist activity and selectivity of
thiazolidineones
Compd
b3-ARa
EC50 (mM)(IA)
b2-ARa
(IA)
b1-AR
S3/1b (IA)
Table 1. Comparison of b3-AR agonist activity and selectivity of
thiazolidinediones and related analogues7
22a
22b
22c
22d
23a
23b
23c
23e
0.01(0.94)
0.002(1.0)
0.94(0.79)
0.40(0.93)
0.009(0.95)
0.006(1.1)
0.075(0.96)
0.001(1.0)
(0)
(0)
(0.09)
6(0.65)
nd
b
b
Compd
b3-ARa
EC50 (mM)(IA)
S3/2
(IA)
S3/1
(IA)
ndc
nd
nd
(0.25)
(0)
(0)
(0.25)
1.7(0.79)
221(0.47)
9(0.76)
CL316243
1
8a
8b
8c
10a
10b
17
1.15(0.63)
0.01(1.19)
0.006(1.03)
0.009(1.0)
0.034(0.94)
0.086(1.2)
0.23(1.0)
227(0.43)
119(0.67)
96(0.83)
61(0.40)
18(0.38)
27(0.19)
ndc
259(0.59)
>290(0.0)
48(0.54)
28(0.86)
10(0.58)
110(0.47)
97(0.62)
97(0.21)
272(0.82)
492(0.87)
113(0.80)
38(0.82)
38(0.76)
nd
745(0.29)
86(0.56)
290(0.86)
54(0.71)
133(0.69)
423(0.82)
73(0.90)
(0)
aSee footnotes in Table 1.
bSee footnotes in Table 1.
cSee footnotes in Table 1.
0.02(1.0)
13
0.034(1.1)
0.001(1.0)
0.008(0.83)
0.009(1.22)
0.003(0.86)
0.009(1.06)
20a
20b
20c
20d
20e
Table 3. b1-AR and b2-AR binding inhibition constants (Ki)
Compd
b1-AR Bindinga
(Ki, mM)
b2-AR Bindinga
(Ki, mM)
ab-AR agonistic activities were assessed by measurement of cAMP
accumulation levels in CHO cells expressing human b-ARs; the
intrinsic activities (IA) were given as a fraction of the maximal stimu-
lation with isoproterenol.
13
17
22a
9.10
9.49
0.0038
2.10
74.0
0.0072
bAgonist selectivity for b3 over bn is defined by S3/n=bn EC50/b3 EC50
.
aBinding potency was reported as Ki (mM), the binding inhibition
cnd=not determined.
constant, determined by inhibition of 125I-iodocyanopindolol.