via oxidative coupling. Frequently, the classic protocols
developed by Hay,12 Glaser,13 and Eglinton14 are the methods
of choice, although newer combinations and modifications
have also been developed.15 Diederich and co-workers have
introduced a solution spray flash vacuum pyrolysis of suitable
precursors for the formation of even- and odd-numbered
polyynes.16
Table 1. Optimization of Copper and Fluoride Ion Mediated
Dimerization of (Triisopropylsilyl)acetylenes
The instability of simple and higher polyynes is a major
challenge in their preparation. They are highly sensitive to
polymerization and prone to rapid decomposition.17 Terminal
phenylbutadiynes are particularly sensitive.10 Recently, dif-
ferent protocols have been developed for the in situ one-pot
desilylation/dimerization of acetylenes. Mori and Hiyama and
co-workers18 employed CuCl in DMF under air or oxygen
with (trimethylsilyl)acetylene in the absence of fluoride ion
to afford high yields (80-100%) of the homocoupled
product. This procedure has also been applied to the synthesis
of unsymmetrically substituted diacetylenes when alkynyl-
trimethylsilanes are mixed with 1-chloroalkynes.19 Haley et
al. reported a different in situ one-pot desilylation/dimeriza-
tion strategy for the synthesis of tetrayne-linked dehydroben-
zoannulenes. This method combines standard Eglinton
coupling conditions with an excess of potassium carbonate
to effect the protodesilylation of trimethylsilyl (TMS)
protected acetylenes in good yields.20
fluorine-
entry [1] (mM) copper source
source
time (h) yield (%)
1
2
3
4
1a , 2.0
1a , 4.0
1a , 4.0
1a , 4.0
Cu(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2
TBAF
1 equiv
TBAF
1 equiv
TBAF
1 equiv
TBAF
2 equiv
-
TBAF
1 equiv
CsF
1 equiv
TBAF
1 equiv
TBAF
1 equiv
4
4
3
2
2a , 68a
2a , 45a
2a , 42
2a , 45
5
6
1a , 4.0
1b, 2.0
CuF2
Cu(OAc)2
2
2
NRb
2b, 15-40
7
8
9
1b, 2.0
1b, 2.0
1b, 2.0
Cu(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2
3
3
2
2b, 6
2b, 100c
2b, <5d
CuCl,
TMEDA
We have previously investigated the synthesis of a novel
family of acetylenic cyclophanes21 and wished to extend these
studies to tetrayne-bridged systems. Our synthesis of acety-
lenic precursors involved the use of triisopropylsilyl (TIPS)
protected phenylbutadiyne units. Deprotection and isolation
of the terminal acetylenes was not possible as the products
rapidly decomposed before oxidative coupling could occur.
Consequently, we chose to develop an alternative desilyla-
tion/dimerization protocol using a fluoride source to effect
desilylation of TIPS-protected acetylenes.
a Substrate not added by syringe pump. b NR ) no reaction. c TBAF
added via syringe pump instead of substrate. d Benzene used as solvent.
Initially, the dimerization of model compounds 1a and 1b
(Table 1) was investigated. Compound 1a was stirred with
a fluoride source (TBAF)22 and Cu(OAc)2 in pyridine/ether
(3:1) for 4 h to give a 68% yield of the diyne product.
Doubling the concentration of 1a did not increase the yield
(entry 2). It appeared that the deprotected phenylbutadiyne
was polymerizing rapidly and thus competing with the
desired dimerization. Thus, controlled addition of substrate
1a via syringe pump was attempted (entry 3). Unfortunately,
under identical concentrations, yields comparable to those
without controlled addition were obtained. An increase in
the number of equivalents of fluoride ion also had no effect
(entry 4). Exposure of 1a to CuF2 as a combined source of
fluoride ion for desilylation and copper ion for oxidative
coupling also proved futile. Copper(II) fluoride is insoluble
in common organic solvents, and under heterogeneous
reaction conditions only the starting material was recovered.
Despite the modest yields, the dimerization of 1b was
investigated, but results were irreproducible and the yields
varied from 15 to 40%. Substitution of TBAF with CsF23 as
the fluoride source decreased the yield to 6% for the
corresponding tetrayne (entry 7), while altering the Cu source
using Hay’s conditions (entry 9) gave a 5% isolated yield.
These disappointing results appeared to be a consequence
(10) Haley, M. M.; Bell, M. L.; English, J. J.; Johnson, C. A.; Weakley,
T. J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2956.
(11) (a) Haley, M. M.; Langsdorf, B. L. Chem. Commun. 1997, 1122.
(b) Rubin, Y.; Parker, T. C.; Khan, S. I.; Holliman, C. L.; McElvany, S.
W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 5308. (c) Tobe, Y.; Nakagawa, N.;
Naemura, K.; Wakabayashi, T.; Shida, T.; Achiba, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1998, 120, 4544. (d) Rubin, Y.; Parker, T. C.; Pastor, S. J.; Jalisatgi, S.;
Boulle, C.; Wilkins, C. L. Angew Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 110, 1353. (e) Fallis,
A. G. Can. J. Chem. 1999, 77, 159.
(12) (a) Hay, A. S. J. Org. Chem. 1960, 25, 1275. (b) Hay, A. S. J. Org.
Chem. 1962, 27, 3320.
(13) (a) Glaser, C. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1869, 2, 422. (b) Glaser, C.
Ann. Chem. Pharm. 1870, 154, 137.
(14) Eglinton, G.; Galbraith, A. R. Chem. Ind. (London) 1956, 737.
(15) (a) Siemsen, P.; Livingston, R. C.; Diederich, F. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2632. For additional palladium-based alkyne coupling
methods, see: (b) Liu, Q.; Burton, D. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 4371.
(c) Godt, A. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7471.
(16) Rubin, Y.; Lin, S. S.; Knobler, C. B.; Anthony, J.; Boldi, A. M.;
Diederich, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 6943.
(17) Patel, G. N.; Chance, R. R.; Turi, E. A.; Khanna, Y. P. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1978, 100, 6644.
(18) Ikegashira, K.; Nishihara, Y.; Hirabayashi, K.; Mori, A.; Hiyama,
T. Chem. Commun. 1997, 1039.
(19) Nishihara, Y.; Ikegashira, K.; Mori, A.; Hiyama, T. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1998, 39, 4075.
(20) Haley, M. M.; Bell, M. L.; Brand, S. C.; Kimball, D. B.; Pak, J. J.;
Wan, W. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 7483.
(21) Collins, S. K.; Yap, G. P. A.; Fallis, A. G. Angew Chem., Int. Ed.
2000, 39, 385.(b) Collins, S. K.; Yap, G. P. A.; Fallis, A. G. Org. Lett.
2000, 2, 3189.
(22) (a) Oda, H.; Sato, M.; Morizawa, Y.; Oshima, K.; Nozaki, H.
Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 3257. (b) Johnson, T. R.; Walton, D. R. M.
Tetrahedron 1972, 28, 5221.
(23) (a) Chan, T. H.; Massuda, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 3383. (b)
Chan, T. H.; Ong, B. S. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 2994.
2884
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 18, 2001