is interesting to note that irrespective of the number of the
electroactive aryl (2,5-dimethoxytolyl) groups (i.e., 6 aryls
in 1c, 4 aryls in 2c), these electron donors showed only a
single reversible (CV) wave at a potential of 1.15 ( 0.01 V
vs. SCE, similar to that obtained with the model compound
3. A quantitative evaluation of the CV peaks with added
ferrocene (as an internal standard, Eox ) 0.45 V vs SCE)
revealed that the reversible cyclic voltammograms in Figure
1 correspond to the production of a monocation of 3,
tetracation of 2c, and hexacation of 1c by transfer of one,
equiv of neutral 1c in dichloromethane at 22 °C, a dramatic
color change to bright green (λmax ) 415, 550, and 1105
nm, ꢀ1105 ) 1400 M-1 cm-1) occurred immediately:
4
+• + 1/61c f 1/61c6+• + 4
(2)
(It is noteworthy that the absorption spectrum of hexacationic
1c6+• obtained above was identical to that obtained by an
oxidation of 1c using either SbCl5 or by an electrochemical
method.19]
15
four, and six electrons, respectively.
The UV-vis spectral analysis established the simultaneous
oxidation of 1c and reduction of 4+• in quantitative yields
(eq 2), and the uncluttered character of the electron transfer
was established by the presence of well-defined isosbestic
points at λmax ) 388, 520, and 714 nm when a solution of
4+• was treated with incremental amounts of 1c (see Figure
2A). Furthermore, a plot of the depletion of 4+• (i.e., decrease
of the absorbance at 672 nm) and formation of 1c6+• (i.e.,
increase in the absorbance at 1105 nm) against the increments
of added 1c in Figure 2B established that 4+• was completely
consumed after the addition of 1/6 equiv of 1c; the resulting
absorption spectrum of 1c6+• remained unchanged upon
further addition of neutral 1c (i.e., eq 2).
The highly characteristic absorption spectra of the hexa-
cationic 1c6+• and tetracationic 2c4+• are strikingly similar
to that of the model cation radical 3+• as shown in Figure
2C.20 Moreover, the spectra of partially oxidized 1c (or 2c)
were uniformly the same irrespective of the degree of
oxidation, as confirmed by the reverse addition of a solution
of naphthalene cation radical 4+• to a solution of 1c (or 2c).
As such, the strong similarity in the UV-vis absorption
spectra of 1c6+• and 2c4+• with that of the model 3+• suggests
that there are minimal interactions between the donor
moieties in 1c and 2c via the platform frameworks.21
It is interesting to note that the oxidizing strength of these
multiply charged cation radicals 1c6+• and 2c4+• (Ered ) 1.15
V vs. SCE) is similar to that of the extensively utilized tris-
4-bromophenylamminium cation radical22 (magic blue, Ered
) 1.1 V vs. SCE) as an aromatic oxidant in a variety of
The highly reversible oxidation of 1c and 2c prompted
the isolation of their multiply charged paramagnetic cation-
radical salts. Thus, treatment of a solution of 1c with
antimony pentachloride (SbCl5) in anhydrous dichloro-
methane at -78 °C immediately resulted in a bright green
solution (vide infra) from which the microcrystalline salt
-
[1c6+•(SbCl6 )6] could be isolated, by precipitation using
hexane, in nearly quantitative yield according to the stoi-
chiometry shown:16
1c + 9SbCl5 f 1c6+•(SbCl6 )6 + 3SbCl3
(1)
-
-
In a similar vein, tetracationic [2c4+•(SbCl6 )4] was prepared
in 96% yield from 2c. These highly colored cation-radical
salts are extremely robust and can be recrystallized readily
from a dichloromethane solution by a slow diffusion of
n-hexane at -30 °C. The purity of the crystalline hexa-
cationic 1c6+• and the tetracationic 2c4+• was determined by
iodometric titrations17 and was further confirmed by a
spectroscopic titration method (vide infra).
To confirm these multiple electron-transfer processes for
the formation of the hexacation and tetracation from 1c and
2c using SbCl5, we carried out their oxidation (in dichloro-
methane) using a stable hindered naphthalene cation radical
(4+•)18 as an aromatic one-electron oxidant (Ered ) 1.34 V
vs. SCE).
(16) For the stoichiometry of the oxidation of donors with SbCl5, see:
Rathore, R.; Kumar, A. S.; Lindeman, S. V.; Kochi, J. K. J. Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 5847.
(17) The purity of the isolated [1c6+•(SbCl6-)6] and [2c4+•(SbCl6-)4] was
determined by iodometric titration and was found to be greater than 98%.
For a general procedure for iodometric titrations of cation radicals, see:
Rathore, R.; Kochi, J. K. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 4399 and also ref 9.
(18) Rathore, R.; Le Mague`res, P.; Lindeman, S. V.; Kochi, J. K. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 809. Also see: Rathore, R.; Le Mague`res, P.;
Kochi, J. K. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 6826.
(19) The oxidation of 1c to its green cation radical can be carried out
electrochemically at Eox ) 1.2 V vs SCE in dichloromethane containing
0.05 M n-Bu4NPF6 at 0 °C.
When a dark blue solution of 4+• (λmax ) 672, 616, 503,
and 396 nm; ꢀ672 ) 9300 M-1 cm-1) was mixed with 1/6
(14) 4,4′-Dimethyl-3,6-dimethoxybiphenyl (3): mp 162-163 °C; 1H
NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.44 (s, 3H), 2.55 (s, 3H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.96 (s, 3H), 6.89
(s, 1H), 6.98 (s, 1H), 7.35 (d, 2 H), 7.55 (d, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ
16.79, 21.76, 56.73, 57.52, 113.92, 115.88, 127.04, 127.82, 129.49, 130.02,
136.71, 137.18, 150.93, 152.63; GC-MS m/z 242 (M+), 242 calcd for
C16H18O2. Anal. Calcd for C16H18O2: C, 79.31; H, 7.49; O, 13.21. Found:
C, 79.22; H, 7.58.
(15) The reduced current response for equimolar 1c (or 2c) as compared
to the ferrocene as an added internal standard can be readily attributed to
the difference in the diffusion coefficient of 1c (or 2c) due to difference in
the size and the shape; see: Flanagan, J. B.; Margel, S.; Bard, A. J.; Anson,
F. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 4248. However, a preliminary cyclic
voltammetric study, which will be published elsewhere, showed a current
ratio of 1 with an equimolar solution of 1c and hexakis(4-ferrocenylphenyl)-
benzene as an internal standard: Rathore, R.; Burns, C. L., unpublished
results.
(20) UV-vis absorption data for various cation radicals in dichloro-
methane at 22 °C: [1c6+•(SbCl6-)6] λmax 415, 550, and 1105 nm, ꢀ1105
1400 M-1 cm-1; [2c4+•(SbCl6-)4] λmax 385, 570, and 1000 nm, ꢀ1000
)
)
1700 M-1 cm-1; [3+•SbCl6-] λmax 420, 640, and 1115 nm, ꢀ1115 ) 3200
M-1 cm-1
.
(21) The lack of electronic communication amongst various aryl groups
in 1c can be attributed to the propeller shape of the hexaphenylbenzene
framework. We believe that the synthesis of an analogue of 1c (in progress)
in which the six aryl groups are connected to planar hexa-peri-hexa-
benzocoronene framework will lead to extensive electronic communication
amongst aryl groups. Compare: Ito, S.; Herwig, P. T.; Bo¨hme, T.; Rabe, J.
P.; Rettig, W.; Mu¨llen, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7698.
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 18, 2001
2889