Chemistry Letters 2001
841
previously reported one-pot glycosylation procedure in order to
optimize the reaction conditions (Table 1).
Thus, a convergent total synthesis of F1α antigen was
accomplished by one-pot sequential glycosylation and whose
method proved to be applicable for the rapid assembly of vari-
ous types of complex oligosaccharides. Also, it should be
noted that the control of the stereoselectivity of glycosylation is
influenced by the kind of the counter anion of the catalyst.
The TrB(C6F5)4-catalyzed glycosylation of 4 with phenyl-
carbonate donor 2 proceeded more smoothly in trifluoro-
methylbenzene (BTF) compared with that in CH2Cl2 and the
desired disaccharide 11 was obtained in good yield (Table 1,
Entries 1–3).4 After optimization, the best condition was deter-
mined as shown in Entry 4 (84%, in BTF, MS 5A, at –15 °C,
1.8 equivalent of donor). The glycosylation of 4 with glycosyl
fluoride 3 was further examined by using 20 mol% of TfOH
and 11 was obtained in excellent yield (94%).5,14
Then, two types of one-pot sequential glycosylation were
attempted as shown in Scheme 2. In the first step, glycosyl
phenylcarbonate 2 or fluoride 3 was treated with thioglycoside
4 in the presence of a catalyst such as TrB(C6F5)4 or TfOH, and
4 was almost completely consumed within 5 h or 1 h, respec-
tively, which was confirmed by TLC monitoring. Next, the
second glycosylation of glycosyl amino acid 5 with thus formed
disaccharide was tried by successive addition of NIS in one-pot
operation, and fully protected F1α 12 was stereoselectively
obtained in high yield (80 or 89%, respectively).
The present research is partially supported by Grant-in-Aids
for Scientific Research from Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science and Technology. The authors wish to thank Mr.
Hirokazu Ohsawa, Dr. Shigeru Nakajima, and Ms. Aya Mitsuya,
Banyu Pharmaceutical Company, for their kind help concerning
mass-spectrometry, NMR, and elementary analysis.
References and Notes
1
Y. Yamashita, Y. S. Chung, T. Sawada, R. Horie, T. Saito, K.
Murayama, R. Kannagi, and M. Sowa, Oncology, 55, 70 (1998); Y.
Yamashita, Y. S. Chung, R. Horie, R. Kannagi, and M. Sowa, J. Natl.
Cancer Inst., 87, 441 (1995); Y. Yamashita, Y. S. Chung, T. Sawada,
Y. Kondo, K. Hirayama, A. Inui, B. Nakata, M. Okuno, R. Horie, T.
Saito, K. Murayama, R. Kannagi, and M. Sowa, Int. J. Cancer, 58,
349 (1994).
2
3
D. Qiu and R. R. Koganty, Tetrahedron Lett., 38, 45 (1997).
X-T. Chen, D. Sames, and S. J. Danishefsky, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120,
7760 (1998).
K. Takeuchi, T. Tamura, and T. Mukaiyama, Chem. Lett., 2000, 122;
K. Takeuchi, T. Tamura, and T. Mukaiyama, Chem. Lett., 2000, 124.
H. Jona, K. Takeuchi, and T. Mukaiyama, Chem. Lett., 2000, 1278.
H. Yamada, T. Harada, H. Miyazaki, and T. Takahashi, Tetrahedron
Lett., 35, 3979 (1994).
4
5
6
7
8
A. B. Charette, N. Turcotte, and B. Côté, J. Carbohydr. Chem., 13,
421 (1994).
Wm. Rosenbrook, Jr., D. A. Riley, and P. A. Lartey, Tetrahedron
Lett., 26, 3 (1985); G. H. Posner and S. R. Haines, Tetrahedron Lett.,
26, 5 (1985).
M. Lergenmüller, Y. Ito, and T. Ogawa, Tetrahedron, 54, 1381
(1998).
9
10 Y. Nakahara, H. Iijima, S. Sibayama, and T. Ogawa, Tetrahedron
Lett., 31, 6897 (1990).
11 G. H. Veeneman, S. H. van Leeuwen, and J. H. van Boom,
Tetrahedron Lett., 31, 1331 (1990); P. Konradsson, U. E. Udodong,
and B. Fraser-Reid, Tetrahedron Lett., 31, 4313 (1990).
12 H. Jona, H. Mandai, and T. Mukaiyama, Chem. Lett., 2001, 426.
13 M. Oikawa, W. C. Liu, Y. Nakai, S. Koshida, K. Fukase, and S.
Kusumoto, Synlett, 12, 1179 (1996).
Transformation of 12 into F1α is demonstrated as in
Scheme 3. In the first place, azido group of 12 was reduced
with thioacetic acid to give 13 in 85% yield. Successive de-
protection of DCPhth group of 13 smoothly proceeded to afford
the desired diacetamido glycosyl amino acid 14 in high yield
after acetylation (2 steps, 82%) only when hydrazine acetate15
was used in ethanol at 70 °C. On the other hand, the deprotection
under standard conditions (hydrazine hydrate, ethylenediamine,
and NaBH4-reduction followed by AcOH) gave complicated
mixtures. Then, removal of benzyl and benzyloxycarbonyl
groups of compound 14 by hydrogenolysis, and careful saponi-
fication of p-MeBz group afforded the final product F1α (1) in
84% yield.16
14 T. Mukaiyama, H. Jona, and K. Takeuchi, Chem. Lett., 2000, 696.
15 H. H. Lee, D. A. Schwartz, J. F. Harris, J. P. Carver, and J. J.
Krepinsky, Can. J. Chem., 64, 1912 (1986); X.-S. Ye and C.-H.
Wong, J. Org. Chem., 65, 2410 (2000).
16 Selected 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O, δ = TMS); δ 4.26 (1H, d, J = 7.9
Hz, H-1"), 4.36 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz, H-1'), 4.67 (1H, d, J = 3.7, H-1);
Selected 13C NMR (125 MHz, D2O, δ = TMS); δ 97.7 (C-1), 101.1
(C-1'), 102.5 (C-1"); HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C25H44N3O18,
674.2626; found 674.2620). [α]20 = +54.0° (c 0.1, H2O); FT-IR
D
(KBr): 1643, 1072, 1049 cm–1; Anal. Calcd for C25H49N3O21 3H2O:
C, 41.26; H, 6.79; N, 5.77%. Found: C, 41.46; H, 7.17; N, 5.97%.