Synthesis of (()-Strychnine
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 123, No. 38, 2001 9331
Scheme 11. Second Synthesis of 40a
Scheme 10. First Synthesis of 40a
a Conditions: (a) MEMCl (14 equiv), Na2CO3 (12 equiv), DMF,
room temperature, 50 min, 86%; (b) trimethylsilylacetylene (2 equiv),
Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.05 equiv), CuI (0.1 equiv), Et3N, room temperature, 1
h, 98%; (c) i. 3 N HCl, THF, room temperature, 3 d; ii. (COCl)2, room
temperature, 14 h, 83%; (d) 37 (0.76 equiv), NaOH (7.7 equiv), Bu4NCl
(0.9 equiv), H2O (2.5 equiv), CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 50 min, 86% based on 37.
a Conditions: (a) H2 (3.4 atm), 10% Pd-C, 1 N HCl-MeOH (1:1),
room temperature, 2 d; (b) cis-3-iodoacryloyl chloride (1.5 equiv), 2,6-
lutidine (1.4 equiv), CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 25 min, 71% (2 steps); (c)
trimethylsilylacetylene (3.6 equiv), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.04 equiv), CuI (4.5
equiv), Et3N (2.1 equiv), C6H6, room temperature, 1 h, 78%; (d) MnO2
(20 equiv), C6H6, 90 °C, 25 min, 63%; (e) KF‚2H2O (1.4 equiv), 18-
crown-6 (0.03 equiv), THF, room temperature, 2 h, 85%.
Second Synthesis of 40. The five-step synthesis described
above proved to be too cumbersome for the production of
sufficient quantities of the [2 + 2 + 2] cycloaddition precursor
40 for subsequent studies. For this reason, a more convergent
route to the enynoylindole was developed (Scheme 11).20 This
path involved the construction of the cis enyne before acylation,
by the coupling of cis-3-iodoacrylic acid 2-methoxyethoxy-
methyl ester with trimethylsilylacetylene to afford 41. Conver-
sion to the acid chloride 42 was achieved by ester hydrolysis65
and reaction with oxalyl chloride. Gratifyingly, the indole
nitrogen of 37 could not only be acylated with 42, but the pro-
duct was also simultaneously desilylated by modification of the
original phase-transfer conditions.55 Rapid addition of the acid
chloride to a CH2Cl2 solution of acetyltryptamine in the presence
of powdered NaOH, Bu4NCl, and H2O gave good yields (86%)
of the enynoylindole 40.66,67 This five-step sequence was readily
scaled up to afford multigram quantities of 40.
[2 + 2 + 2] Cycloaddition of 40 with BTMSA and
Acetylene. With enyoylindole 40 in hand, the cocyclization of
40 with acetylene and BTMSA, the latter with potentially
cleavable carbon-silicon bonds, was examined (Scheme 12).
BTMSA is a commonly employed acetylene surrogate in the
cobalt-mediated [2 + 2 + 2] cycloaddition reaction due to its
ease of use and resistance to autocyclization. Indeed, initial
studies proved promising. Utilizing the reactivity of CpCo-
(C2H4)2 at lower temperatures to minimize cyclobutadiene
formation, reaction of unsubstituted enynoylindole 43 gave a
favorable yield of 44 (70%) versus 45 (27%). Encouraged by
this result, the cocyclization of 40 with BTMSA was examined.
However, this reaction gave significantly more of the undesired
cyclobutadiene complex 47a (41%) at the expense of 46a (47%).
This result was not too surprising, given that the effect of
3-substitution on the indole nucleus has previously been shown
to be a significant hindrance to the successful cyclization of
N-(4-penynoyl)indoles with BTMSA.25a Switching to acetylene
was thought to help in this regard and, moreover, would
eliminate the need to remove silyl substituents in later steps.68
previously worked well for the acylation of the indole nitrogen
failed to yield any of the desired unsaturated amide product.
Deprotonation of 37 with KOH in DME32 followed by addition
of the acid chloride returned only the starting indole. The same
results were obtained upon deprotonation with BuLi54 and weak
amine bases53b (Et3N, 2,4-lutidine). Attempted acylation em-
ploying Illi’s phase transfer method was similarly disappoint-
ing.55,56 Notably, the parent indole system also failed to acylate
under these conditions, indicating that competing deprotonation
of the amide hydrogen in 37 (pKa = 17,57 in comparison to
pKa ) 16.6 for 3-methylindole58) was not detrimental.
To facilitate the formation of the amide, the nucleophilicity
of the heterocyclic nitrogen center was increased by the
reduction of the aromatic indole system to indoline (Scheme
10). Thus, catalytic hydrogenation of the indole double bond59
followed by acylation with cis-3-iodoacryloyl chloride in the
presence of 2,6-lutidine gave the amide 38. Palladium-mediated
coupling33 with trimethylsilylacetylene afforded the enyne
system 39 in 78% yield for the three steps. Rearomatization of
the indoline by oxidation with DDQ60 resulted in poor yields
(31%) due to the instability of 39 to the reaction conditions.
Dehydrogenation with Wilkinson’s catalysts61 also destroyed
the rather sensitive indoline. However, oxidation with activated
MnO237,62 in refluxing benzene gave the desired oxidized indole
system in a moderate 63% yield.63 Finally, desilylation with
KF64 afforded the enynoylindole 40 in 36% yield for the entire
sequence.
(53) (a) Moss, R. A.; Wilk, B.; Krogh-Jespersen, K.; Westbrook, J. D.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 6729. (b) Wilson, R. M.; Commons, T. J. J.
Org. Chem. 1975, 50, 4467.
(54) De Silva, S. O.; Snieckus, V. Can. J. Chem. 1978, 56, 1621.
(55) Illi, V. O. Synthesis 1979, 387.
(56) For another study of indole acylation, see: Ottoni, O.; Cruz, R.;
Alves, R. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 13915.
(57) Homer, R. B.; Johnson, C. D. In The Chemistry of Amides; Zabicky,
J., Ed., Wiley: New York, 1970; pp 188-197.
(58) Remers, W. A. In Indoles; Houlihan, W. J., Ed.; Wiley: New York,
1972; Part One, p 14.
(59) Daly, J. W.; Mauger, A. B.; Yonemitsu, O.; Antonov, V. K.; Takase,
K.; Witkop, B. Biochemistry 1967, 6, 648.
(60) (a) Feng, H.; Foxman, B. M.; Snider, B. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 6417. (b) Ono, S.; Yamafuji, T.; Chaki, H.; Morita, H.; Todo, Y.;
Okada, N.; Maekawa, M.; Kitamura, K.; Tai, M.; Marita, H. Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 1995, 43, 1492. (c) Fu, P. P.; Harvey, R. G. Chem. ReV. 1978, 78,
317.
(63) (a) Bonnaud, B.; Bigg, D. C. H. Synthesis 1994, 465. (b) Stamos,
I. K. Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 1813. (b) Kametani, T.; Ohsawa, T.; Ihara, M.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1981, 290.
(64) Carpino, L. A.; Sau, A. C. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1979,
514.
(65) Abarbri, M.; Parrain, J.-L.; Cintrat, J.-C.; Ducheˆne, A. Synthesis
1996, 82.
(66) The choice of the phase-transfer catalyst turned out to be critical to
the success of the reaction. Use of Bu4NHSO4, as was originally described
in Illi’s paper (ref 55), gave no trace of 40, while most other tetraalkylam-
monium salts examined generated at least some of the desired product.
(67) Oldroyd, D. L.; Weedon, A. C. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 1333.
(61) Nishiguchi, T.; Tachi, K.; Fukuzumi, K. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40,
237.
(62) Fatiadi, A. J. Synthesis 1976, 133.