METABOLISM AND EXCRETION OF ZONIPORIDE
653
formed via oxidation of the quinoline ring of zoniporide, was the humans, zoniporide metabolism was the primary route of clearance in
primary circulating and excretory metabolite in humans. Its exposure
was 2-fold greater than that of unchanged zoniporide in plasma, and
approximately 52% of the dose was excreted as M1 in the urine and
feces. Metabolite M1 was also pharmacologically active against the
NHE-1 receptor. However, the activity was ϳ3-fold less than that of
the parent compound. Because the systemic exposure of M1 was
greater than that of the parent drug and the protein binding was
approximately the same as that of zoniporide, the possibility of the
metabolite exerting pharmacological activity in addition to the parent
in vivo could not be ruled out. Given that M1 was the major circu-
lating metabolite in humans and was pharmacologically active, in
vitro studies using human liver subcellular fractions were performed
to identify the enzymes responsible for the formation of M1. Further-
more, this was important in light of the fact that inhibition of the
enzyme responsible for the conversion of zoniporide to M1 would
increase the AUC of the parent drug significantly and would also
possibly affect the efficacy of the compound. Phenotying studies
revealed that formation of M1 was primarily catalyzed by aldehyde
oxidase (Clint ϭ 22 l/min/mg cytosolic protein). Aldehyde oxidase is
a cytosolic molybdo-flavoenzyme that is expressed predominantly in
the liver, lung, and kidney and plays a major role in the oxidation of
aldehydes and nitrogen-containing heterocyclic compounds (Kita-
mura et al., 2006). Some heteroaromatic compounds of pharmacolog-
ical and toxicological importance that are metabolized by aldehyde
oxidase include carbazeran (Kaye et al., 1985), famciclovir (Rashidi et
al., 1997), methotrexate (Jordan et al., 1999), zaleplon (Lake et al.,
2002), brimonidine (Acheampong et al., 1996), and N-[(2Ј-diethyl-
amino)ethyl]acridine-4-carboximide (Schofield et al., 2000). Thus, it
is not surprising that zoniporide was a substrate of aldehyde oxidase.
the rat and dog. Only 40 and 37% of the total dose constituted
unchanged zoniporide in the rat and dog, respectively. However,
comparison of plasma exposure of unchanged zoniporide and total
radioactivity in rat and dog revealed that even though circulating
radioactivity comprising metabolites in rats just as in humans, un-
changed zoniporide was the primary constituent of total radioactivity
in dogs.
Analysis of the metabolic profile of zoniporide in the rat revealed
that both human circulating metabolites (M1 and M3) were present in
the rat in addition to several other metabolites. Although dogs me-
tabolized zoniporide extensively, in contrast to humans and rats, this
species showed differences in its metabolic profile. Metabolite M1,
which was a major metabolite in rats and humans, was not detected in
the dogs, whereas M3 was a minor circulating metabolite (6% of the
parent) but present in ϳ9% of the dose in the excreta. The absence of
M1 in the dog was not surprising given that dogs lack aldehyde
oxidase activity (Kitamura et al., 2006). Even though oxidation was a
primary pathway of metabolism in dogs, the major metabolites ob-
served were the dihydrodiol (M8) and hydroxyzoniporide (M10).
Because the other oxidative metabolites detected in the rat and dog
were absent in humans, no further consideration was given to these
metabolites with respect to potential safety implications.
An assessment of the coverage of major circulating metabolites in
humans was made in this study by comparing estimated exposure
levels of M1 and M3 in humans with those in preclinical species.
Assessment was done only in the rat because the dog did not produce
the M1 metabolite, and M3 was produced in Ͻ10% of the parent in
vivo. Because levels of M3 in rat exceeded those estimated in humans
Potential drug-drug interactions due to inhibition of aldehyde oxidase by 1.7- to 2.0-fold (Table 4), the exposure to this human metabolite
have not been established. Although cytochrome P450 enzymes have
been and continue to be a major focus of drug interactions, alterations in
the activities of other drug-metabolizing enzymes can also be an under-
lying mechanism of drug-drug interactions. Only one clinically relevant
drug-drug interaction between cimetidine and zaleplon has been ascribed
to inhibition of aldehyde oxidase in the literature so far (Renwick et al.,
2002). Because several drugs have been demonstrated to be human
aldehyde oxidase inhibitors in vitro (Obach, 2004; Obach et al., 2004), it
is possible that these drugs could potentially increase the levels of
zoniporide in humans. No such drug-drug interactions studies have been
conducted and it remains to be determined whether aldehyde oxidase
inhibitors identified using in vitro methods could potentially cause a more
profound interaction of clinical significance in vivo.
Metabolites M3 and M2, the carboxylic acid analogs of zoniporide
and quinolone metabolite (M1), were also observed in humans. This
finding suggested that the hydrolytic cleavage was another pathway
by which zoniporide was metabolized. Although M3 accounted for
ϳ20% of parent drug in humans, M2 was found only in the excreta in
amounts of ϳ17% of the dose. The exact metabolic pathway for the
formation of M2 was difficult to discern because the metabolite can be
formed via two parallel pathways (Fig. 8). One pathway could involve
hydrolysis of M1 to M2. Alternatively, zoniporide could undergo
hydrolysis to M3, which could subsequently undergo an aldehyde
oxidase-mediated or a P450-mediated oxidation of the quinoline ring
to yield M2. Because M2 was not detected in the urine or the plasma
of humans, it is possible that the formation of this metabolite in vivo
was possibly mediated by microflora in the gastrointestinal tract.
The metabolism and excretion studies using [14C]zoniporide in the
rat and dog suggested that the route of excretion of zoniporide in these
two species was similar to that in humans and the majority of the dose
was considered to be covered in the rat. The estimated exposure level
of M1 in humans, on the other hand, was comparable with that
estimated in rats as depicted in Tables 4 and 5. Because zoniporide
was administered intravenously to humans and the preclinical species,
the coverage of metabolite M1 in the preclinical species was also
ascertained by estimating the amount of metabolite excreted in the rat
and human. This estimation indicated that the amount of M1 to which
the rat was exposed was 5.9-fold greater relative to that in humans.
Furthermore, M1 did not have any structural alerts that would pose a
risk to humans. Thus, M1 was also considered to be adequately evalu-
ated in the toxicology species, and no further assay validation and
toxicological evaluation of this metabolite was undertaken in nonclinical
safety species. Metabolite M2 was detected only in human feces and was
not present in rat and dog, which indicated that this metabolite was
unique to the humans. However, because M2 was not present in circu-
lation, was pharmacologically inactive, and did not have a functionality
that could potentially be a toxicophore, it was not considered for further
safety evaluation.
In summary, this study demonstrates the primary routes of excre-
tion and metabolism of zoniporide in humans, rats, and dogs. Fur-
thermore, the study also demonstrates the strategy that was used to
assess whether the further toxicological evaluation of the human
circulating metabolites was necessary in the preclinical species. Zo-
niporide is among the few compounds that are almost exclusively
metabolized by aldehyde oxidase in humans (with approximately
three-fourths of its clearance mediated by this enzyme) and hence can
be used as a model substrate for this enzyme. Studies are in progress
to assess the species differences in the metabolism of aldehyde oxi-
dase and understand the structure-metabolism relationship of the
was also eliminated into the feces via the bile. In addition, as in compound.