Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 5575-5580
5575
Dynamic Study of Homoleptic Bimetallic Platinum(II) Complexes Bridged by Fluorinated
Benzenethiolates
Guillermina Rivera,† Sylvain Berne`s,‡ Cecilia Rodriguez de Barbarin,§ and Hugo Torrens*,†
DEPg., F. Qu´ımica, UNAM, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 Me´xico D.F., Mexico, Centro de Qu´ımica,
IC-UAP, Blvd. 14 Sur 6303, San Manuel, 72570 Puebla Pue., Mexico, and F. Ciencias Qu´ımicas,
UANL, Ciudad Universitaria, 66451 S. Nicolas de los Garza, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
ReceiVed April 6, 2001
A variable-temperature 19F NMR study of the homoleptic bimetallic anionic complexes X2[Pt2(µ-SC6F5)2(SC6F5)4]
(X ) K+, 1a; Bu4N+, 1b), X2[Pt2(µ-p-SC6HF4)2(p-SC6HF4)4] (X ) K+, 2a; Bu4N+, 2b), and X2[Pt2(µ-p-SC6F4-
(CF3))2(p-SC6F4(CF3))4] (X ) K+, 3a; Bu4N+, 3b) demonstrates the occurrence of dynamic processes that give
rise to several stereoisomeric species in solution. Experimental evidence suggests that both inversion of configuration
at the sulfur bridging atoms and hindered rotation about the carbon-sulfur bond are involved in generating the
observed isomers. The solid-state X-ray diffraction structures of compounds 1b, 2b, and 3b show that all three
complexes contain planar [Pt2(µ-S)2] rings with an anti configuration.
Introduction
X-ray diffraction studies have shown that solid-state interac-
tions between fluorine atoms on neighboring groups could be
responsible for the restriction of the C-S bond rotation.12-14
Inversion of configuration at metal-bridging sulfur atoms has
been examined, and it was found that the activation energy
Binuclear complexes of d8 transition metal ions of the type
[M2(µ-SR)2(L)4] display a variety of molecular conformations.
The particular molecular conformation depends on a number
of factors, such as whether the complexes incorporate a bent or
a planar [M2(µ-S)2] ring,1 the relative orientation of the
substituents (R) at the sulfur bridging atoms,2 and the extent of
hindered rotation about the R-sulfur bond.3
involved in this process is in the range 40-80 kJ mol-1 15,16
.
The binuclear complexes K2[Pt2(µ-SC6F5)2(SC6F5)4]2- 1a and
K2[Pt2(µ-p-SC6HF4)2(p-SC6HF4)4]2- 2a have been reported
previously.17 In these studies the existence of isomers in solution
was noted and attributed to sulfur inversion, although this
phenomenon was not studied in greater depth.17,18
Conversion between each of these isomers is accomplished
either by flipping of the [M2(µ-S)2] ring,4 hindered rotation about
the R-sulfur bond,5 inversion of configuration at tricoordinated
pyramidal sulfur atoms,6,7 or a combination these processes.2
Theoretical and experimental studies have shown that the
energy differences between planar and bent structures are
relatively small (ca. 40 kJ mol-1), and it has been pointed out
that, in some cases, the steric repulsion between terminal ligands
or packing forces can ultimately affect the structural choice.8
On the other hand, variable-temperature NMR studies of
complexes bearing pentafluorothiophenolate rings have shown
that, as one would expect, C-S bond rotation is frequently
restricted. The activation energies associated with this process
are in the range 30-50 kJ mol-1, and these values are larger
than those found for comparable nonfluorinated compounds.9-11
In this paper we report the synthesis of the new perfluorinated
compounds X2[Pt2(µ-p-SC6F4(CF3))2(p-SC6F4(CF3))4]2- (X )
K+, 3a; X ) Bu4N+, 3b) as well as the variable-temperature
19F NMR study and the crystal and molecular structures of
(Bu4N)2[Pt2(µ-SC6F5)2(SC6F5)4] 1b, (Bu4N)2[Pt2(µ-p-SC6HF4)2-
(p-SC6HF4)4] 2b, and (Bu4N)2[Pt2(µ-p-SC6F4(CF3))2(p-SC6F4-
(CF3))4] 3b.
Experimental Section
All manipulations were carried out under dry oxygen-free dinitrogen
atmospheres using Schlenk-tube techniques. Solvents were dried and
degassed using standard techniques.19 Thin-layer chromatography (TLC)
† UNAM, Ciudad Universitaria.
‡ IC-UAP.
(11) Davidson, J. L.; McIntosh, C. H.; Leverd, P. C.; Lindsell, W. E.;
Simpson, N. J. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1994, 2423-2429.
(12) Arroyo, M.; Berne`s, S.; Brianso, J. L.; Mayoral, E.; Richards, R. L.;
Rius, J.; Torrens, H. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 599, 170-177.
(13) Wan Abu Bakar, W. A.; Davidson, J. L.; Lindsell, W. E.; McCullough,
K. J. J. Organomet. Chem. 1987, 322, C1-C6.
§ UANL, Ciudad Universitaria.
(1) Aullo´n, G.; Ujaque, G.; Lledo´s, A.; Alvarez, S. Chem. Eur. J. 1999,
5, 1391-1410.
(2) Brown, M. D.; Puddephat, R. J.; Upton, C. E. E. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans. 1976, 2490-2494.
(3) Dixon, K. R.; Moss, K. C.; Smith, M. A. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
1974, 971-977.
(14) Castellanos, A.; Garcia, J. J.; Torrens, H.; Bailey, N.; Rodriguez de
Barbarin, C. O.; Gutierrez, A.; del Rio, F. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
1994, 2861-2866.
(4) Dias, A. R.; Green, M. L. H. J. Chem. Soc. A 1971, 1951-1956.
(5) Agh-Atabay, N. M.; Davidson, J. L. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
1992, 3531-3539.
(15) Shaver, A.; Morris, S.; Turrin, R.; Day, V. M. Inorg. Chem. 1990,
29, 3622-3623.
(6) Abel, E. W.; Bush, R. P.; Hopton, F. J.; Jenkins, C. R. Chem. Commun.
1966, 58-59.
(16) Abel, E. W.; Bhargava, S. K.; Orrell, K. G. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1984,
32, 1-118.
(7) Haake, P.; Turley, P. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 4611-4616.
(8) Aullo´n, G.; Ujaque, G.; Lledo´s, A.; Alvarez, S. Inorg. Chem. 1998,
37, 804-813.
(17) Garcia, J.; Mart´ın, E.; Morales, D.; Torrens, H. Inorg. Chim. Acta
1994, 207, 93-96.
(18) Uso´n, R.; Fornie´s, J.; Uso´n, M. A.; Apaolaza, J. A. Inorg. Chim. Acta
1991, 187, 175-180.
(9) Meaking, P.; Ovenall, D. W.; Sheppard, W. A.; Jesson, J. P. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 522-528.
(19) Riddick, J. A.; Bunger, W. B.; Sakaro, T. K. Organic SolVents:
Physical Properties and Methods of Purification, 4th ed.; Techniques
of Chemistry, Volume II; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1970.
(10) Wan Abu Bakar, W. A.; Davidson, J. L.; Lindsell, W. E.; McCullough,
K. J. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1989, 991-1001.
10.1021/ic010437n CCC: $20.00 © 2001 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 09/22/2001