selectivity (at -40 °C to room temperature over 1 h) to afford
92% yield of the corresponding Michael addition product 9
having the structure shown in Scheme 1 and entry 1 in Table
trimethylsilylprop-2-ynyl phosphate (3)6 and alkylidene-
malonates 4-8, the reaction appears reasonably general.
Thus, the allenyltitanium derived from 2 reacted with, in
addition to 4 where R2 is methyl, alkylidenemalonates in
which R2 is a primary alkyl (5, entry 2) and aryl groups (6
and 7, entries 3 and 4) to afford the corresponding Michael
adduct with more than 97% diastereoselectivity and more
than 92% enantiospecificity. Similarly, the reaction of the
titanium reagent derived from 3 also proceeded with excellent
selectivities (entries 5 and 6). It is noteworthy that the
reaction proceeds smoothly with alkylidenemalonates having
a functional group such as an ester or a halide group (entries
4 and 6).
Scheme 1. Generation of Optically Active Allenyltitaniums
and Their Reaction with Alkylidenemalonates
The resulting Michael addition products can be readily
transformed into a variety of bifunctional compounds such
as 15-18 by conventional reaction sequences, as represented
by the reaction starting with 9, by taking advantage of the
reactivity of the silylacetylene and malonate functionalities
present at each of the terminal positions (Scheme 2). The
1. The enantiomeric ratio (er) of 9 thus obtained was
determined to be 96:4 by GC analysis with use of a chiral
column after derivatization (vide infra).
Scheme 2. Synthetic Transformation Starting with 9 Where
R1 and R2 Are Mea
Table 1. Michael Addition Reaction of Optically Active
Allenyltitaniums with Alkylidenemalonates
a (i) LiCl, dimethyl sulfoxide/H2O, 150 °C; (ii) NaIO4, cat. RuCl3,
CCl4/CH3CN/H2O; (iii) BH3, tetrahydrofuran; (iv) H3O+; (v)
n-Bu4NF, tetrahydrofuran; (vi) H2, Pd/BaSO4/quinoline; (vii) 2 N
HCl, reflux.
anti stereochemistry of 9 was confirmed by the production
1
of the known compound 185 and also by the H NMR
analysis of δ-lactone 16.7 Meanwhile, the absolute config-
uration of 9 was determined by comparison of the sign of
a 2: 97.8% ee. 3: 95.2% ee. b Isolated yield. c Ratio was determined by
GC analysis. d Enantiomeric ratio of the anti isomer. The er values given
in parentheses are simply extrapolated when the starting propargylic
phosphates 2 and 3 are 100% ee. e Determined by GC analysis of 15.
f Determined by GC analysis of the corresponding acid of the type 15.
g Determined by GC analysis of the diol prepared by the reaction of the
compound of the type 15 with LiAlH4. h Determined by HPLC analysis.
i Determined by GC analysis of the diol prepared by the reduction with
LiAlH4 of the compound of the type 15 in which R2 is Ph (debromination
occurred upon treatment with LiAlH4).
optical rotation of 17 with that reported [[R]29 -13.8 (c
D
0.60, CHCl3); lit.3b [R]24 -11 (c 1.0, CHCl3)].
D
Determination of the stereochemistries of other products
10-14 shown in Table 1 was carried out as follows. The
(4) Michael addition reaction of nonchiral or racemic allenylstannanes
and allenylsilanes to R,â-unsaturated carbonyl compounds in the presence
of Lewis acid have been reported: Danheiser, R. L.; Carini, D. J.; Basak,
A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 1604-1606. Santelli, M.; El Abed, D.;
Jellal, A. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 1199-1206. Haruta, J.; Nishi, K.;
Matsuda, S.; Tamura, Y.; Kita, Y. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989,
1065-1066.
(5) Yamamoto reported that Michael addition of allyltitaniums to
alkylidenemalonates proceeds with high anti stereoselectivity: Yamamoto,
Y.; Nishii, S. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 3597-3603. Yamamoto, Y.; Nishii,
S.; Maruyama, K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1985, 386-388.
(6) Optically active propargyl phosphates 2 and 3 could be readily
prepared, respectively, from naturally occurring lactates or 2,3-epoxyheptan-
1-ol derived from 2-heptenol by Sharpless asymmetric epoxidation. See
ref 2 for the synthesis and determination of the optical purities.
Since we used 2 with 97.8% enantiomeric excess (ee), the
overall enantiospecificity from 2 to 9 was calculated to be
94%, and as the enantiospecificity from 2 to the allenyl-
titanium is 97%,2a the degree of enantiospecificity for the
Michael addition reaction was estimated to be 97%.
As revealed from entries 2-6 in Table 1, which shows
the results of the reaction using 2 or diethyl (S)-1-butyl-3-
3544
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 22, 2001