J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10139-10140
10139
Supporting Information).9 The product was isolated by crystal-
lization from the reaction stream after removal of the carbon by
filtration and typically contained 200 ppm of Pd as determined
by ICP-AES analysis.
Analysis of the reaction mixture after filtration of the carbon
demonstrated >125 ppm of Pd in the process stream, i.e. 25% of
the initial catalyst charge. The addition of mercury limited the
reaction to two turnovers providing circumstantial evidence
regarding the phase of the active catalyst.10,11 To unambiguously
assign the role of a homogeneous catalyst we envisaged applica-
tion of a three-phase test.12
Are Heterogeneous Catalysts Precursors to
Homogeneous Catalysts?
Ian W. Davies,* Louis Matty, David L. Hughes, and
Paul J. Reider
Department of Process Research, Merck & Co., Inc.
P.O. Box 2000, Rahway, New Jersey 07065-0900
ReceiVed August 17, 2001
ReVised Manuscript ReceiVed August 29, 2001
Advances in the design of solid supports and the accompanying
developments in analysis have been driven by the combinatorial
revolution and a wide range of supports are now available. Since
the carbonylation reaction is performed under basic conditions
we chose to use a Novasyn TGR resin allowing the attachment
of the substrate with an amide bond. The design features involving
the use of an aryl iodide in addition to the presence of a para-
electron-withdrawing group used as attachment ensure that the
oxidative addition with a homogeneous catalyst would be
extremely facile.
Homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts offer their own
distinct advantages.1 Heterogeneous catalysts have an advantage
that at the end of reaction the catalyst can be removed by simple
filtration. In principle the product is un-contaminated with a
transition metal or ligand and allows the catalyst to be recycled
into the next reaction.2 While the distinction between homoge-
neous and heterogeneous catalysis seems well-defined, in many
cases there may be leaching of the transition metal into solution.
In these instances the question that always remains is whether
the catalytic activity resides with the leached metal. In other
situations, it is unclear whether a “release and capture” of the
transition metal catalyst has occurred. We report a simple
unambiguous test to determine the presence of a homogeneous
catalyst and demonstrate its application in three prototypical
reactions. Not only does this method clarify the phase of the
catalytically active species it also allows additional mechanistic
information to be obtained regarding the system.
Our initial studies were prompted by the carbonylation of 1 to
give the carbomethoxycyclopentenone 2 (eq 1). Although this
Control experiments with resin 3 under our standard conditions
(1 mol % Pd/C, 60 °C, 80 psig CO, 1 M DMA, 2 equiv of Bu3N,
5 equiv of MeOH, 10 h) resulted in quantitative recovery of 5
following cleavage with TFA, i.e. there was no catalytically active
species present in solution. However, addition of resin 3 to the
carbonylation reaction in the presence of 1 led to a 95% yield of
2 and a quantitative formation of ester 6 following TFA cleavage
of the resin-bound product. Iodobenzene was equally effective
at generating a homogeneous catalyst and was itself converted
to methylbenzoate in 97% yield.
transformation worked quite well with the conventional homo-
geneous catalyst Pd(PPh3)2Cl2,3 a heterogeneous catalyst was
sought for this reaction to simplify product isolation. In many of
our programs, the fate of the catalyst is especially important during
processing since the acceptable level of transition metal residuals
is highly regulated in pharmaceutical products. Pd/C has been
used for a number of palladium-catalyzed reactions.4,5 After
parallel catalyst screening, the optimal conditions were identified
at small scale.6 Using these conditions at 1 mol scale (1 mol %
Pd/C, 60 °C, 80 psig CO, 1 M DMA, 2 equiv Bu3N, 5 equiv
MeOH, 10 h) led to the formation of 2 in 98-99% yield.7 There
was no trace of reduction, dimerization, or amide formation8 and
mass balance was accounted for by two low-level impurities (see
The requirement for the organohalide in the generation of an
active catalyst suggests that upon oxidative addition, desorption
of the Pd(II) species, e.g. Ph-Pd-I, occurs which enters a
conventional solution phase catalytic cycle generating a soluble
(1) Gates, B. C. In Catalytic Chemistry; Wiley: New York, 1992.
(2) For the sake of simplicity, in this article we specifically address transition
metal-catalyzed processes and we use palladium in particular to illustrate the
approach. The principles and observations discussed should be broadly
applicable.
(9) All new compounds were fully characterized. The identity of known
compounds were confirmed by comparison (LCMS) with authentic samples.
(10) For suppression of a heterogeneous Pt-catalyzed reaction by Hg(0)
see: Whitesides, G. M.; Hackett, M.; Brainard, R. L.; Lavalleye, J.-P. P. M.;
Sowinski, A. F.; Izumi, A. N.; Moore, S. S.; Brown, D. W.; Staudt, E. M.
Organometallics 1985, 4, 1819. Interpetation of the results from the Hg(0)
test should be viewed with caution: Lin, Y.; Finke, R. G. Inorg. Chem. 1994,
33, 4891. The presence of Hg(0) may lead to suppression of catalysis via
amalgamation, which inhibits the proposed oxidative addition/desorption
mechanism.
(11) For application of dibenzo[a,e]cyclooctetraene as a potent poison for
homogeneous catalysis see: Anton, D. R.; Crabtree, R. H. Organometallics
1983, 2, 855. For application of polymer substrates as a test in hydrogenation
reactions see: Collman, J. P.; Kosydar, K. M.; Bressan, M.; Lamanna, W.;
Garrett, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 2569.
(3) Schoenberg, A.; Heck, R. F. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 3327.
(4) (a) Suzuki-Miyaura reaction: LeBlond, C. R.; Andrews, A. T.; Sun,
Y.; Sowa, J. R. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1555. (b) Amidocarbonylation of imines:
Beller, M.; Moradi, W. A.; Eckert, M.; Neumann, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999,
40, 4523. (c) Heck reaction: Augustine, R. A.; O’Leary, S. T. J. Mol. Catal.
1992, 72, 229. (d) Stille reaction: Liebeskind, L. S.; Penn-Cabrera, E. Org.
Synth. 1999, 77, 135.
(5) For related Ni/C catalyzed reactions see: Lipshutz, B. H.; Ueda, H.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4492.
(6) Parallel reaction screening using the Argonaut Endeavor.
(7) The iodide reacted with similar efficiency where as the chloride was
unreactive even at higher temperatures.
(12) Rebek J.; Gavina, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 7112. Rebek, J.;
Brown, D.; Zimmerman, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 454. Rebek, J.
Tetrahedron 1979, 35, 723.
(8) Schnyder A.; Beller, M.; Mehltretter, G.; Nsenda, T.; Studer, M.;
Indolese, A. F. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 4311.
10.1021/ja016877v CCC: $20.00 © 2001 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 09/25/2001