In a previous communication9 we reported the first general
asymmetric Michael addition10 of a phosphorus nucleophile
to nitroalkenes. Herein we describe the conjugate addition
of the enantiopure phosphite (R,R)-1 to R,â-unsaturated
malonates 2 as a key step in the synthesis of optically active
â-substituted â-phosphono malonates 5 (Scheme 1). This
triple bonds using a solid base was first shown by Koenig
and co-workers,13 who used an Al2O3/KOH system in the
Pudovik reaction of various secondary phosphines and
phosphites.
In recent years other research groups were also involved
in the study of C-C bond formation via Michael addition
using MgO14 or Mg-Al-O-t-Bu hydrotalcite15 as solid base
catalysts.16 In the latter case the activity of the solid base
catalyst was shown to be strongly dependent on the prepara-
tion method of the oxide and the pretreatment temperature.
As heterogeneous reactions can be performed under
particularly mild conditions, we decided to develop a new
solid base for the asymmetric conjugate addition of phos-
phorus nucloephiles to R,â-unsaturated malonates.
Metal oxides can activate P(O)H groups so that deproto-
nation of the P-H bond occurs in the presence of weaker
bases than organolithium reagents such as, for example,
KOH.
Scheme 1. Asymmetric Synthesis of â-Substituted
â-Phosphono Malonatesa
In our study we first examined the effect of different metal
oxides as solid supports for KOH on the stereoselectivity of
the Michael addition of (R,R)-1 to malonate 2a (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2. Case Study for the Screening of the Solid Base
a (a) Fe2O3/KOH, CH2Cl2, rt. (b) TMSCl, NaI, CH3CN, reflux.
(c) CH2Cl2/H2O. (d) CH2N2, MeOH/H2O.
reaction constitutes the first example of asymmetric P-C
bond formation under heterogeneous conditions.
Phosphite (R,R)-1 was prepared from TADDOL11
(R,R)-4,5-bis(diphenylhydroxymethyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-di-
oxo-lane in a two-step procedure as previously reported.9
The conjugate addition of (R,R)-1 to the alkylidene
malonates 2a-e in the presence of Fe2O3/KOH as a solid
base led to chiral â-phosphono malonates 3a-e in good
yields and high diastereomeric excesses.
The TADDOL auxiliary was easily cleaved9,12 without
detectable epimerization or racemization, by refluxing the
addition products in acetonitrile in the presence of TMSCl/
NaI and subsequently hydrolyzing the resulting bistrimeth-
ylsilyl ester.
The solid bases for the initial screening were prepared by
dissolving KOH in methanol and adding the solution to a
stirred suspension of the desired metal oxide in methanol.
The solvent was then removed under reduced pressure, and
the residue dried under vacuum at room temperature. A 1:5
ratio of phosphite/solid support and a 1:1.7 molar ratio of
phosphite/base were initially used.
Formation of the phosphonate 3a could be observed in
all cases with a diastereoselectivity depending on the metal
oxide. The best value was achieved in the case of Fe2O3
(Table 1).
The very polar acids (S)-4a-e were not isolated but
directly esterified with CH2N2 to the corresponding methyl
esters (S)-5a-e, which could be easily purified by flash
column chromatography on silica gel (n-hepane/isopropyl
alcohol 9:1).
The presence of the solid support appeared to be essential
for the activation of the P-H bond toward deprotonation.
No reaction could be observed when only KOH in the
absence of metal oxide was used.
The solvent effect was also studied, and among those
examined, CH2Cl2 led to the best diastereoselectivity com-
The possibility of performing the addition of a phosphorus
compound, containing a labile P-H bond, to double and
(9) Enders, D.; Tedeschi, L.; Bats, J. W. Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 4774-
4776; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4605-4607.
(10) (a) Sibi, M. P.; Manyem, S. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 8033-8061.
(b) Leonard, J.; D´ıez_Barra, E.; Merino, S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
2051-2061. (c) Rossiter, B. E.; Swingle, N. Chem. ReV. 1992, 92, 771-
806.
(11) (a) Beck, A. K.; Bastani, B.; Plattner, D. A.; Petter, W.; Seebach,
D.; Braunschweig, H.; Gysi, P.; La Vecchia, L. Chimia 1991, 45, 238-
244. (b) Seebach, D.; Beck, A. K.; Heckel, A. Angew. Chem. 2001, 113,
96-142; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 92-138.
(12) Morita, T.; Okamoto, Y.; Sakurai, H Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 28,
2523-2526.
(13) (a) Semenzin, D.; Etemad-Moghadam, G.; Albouy, D.; Diallo, O.;
Koenig, M. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 2414-2422. (b) Albouy, D.; Laspe´ras,
M.; Etemad-Moghadam, G.; Koenig, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2311-
2314.
(14) Kabashima, H.; Tsuji, H.; Hattori, H. Appl. Catal., A 1997, 165,
319-325.
(15) Choudary, B. M.; Kantam, M. L.; Reddy, C. V.; Figueras, F.
Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 9357-9364.
(16) (a) Tanabe, K.; Ho¨lderich, W. F. Appl. Catal., A 1999, 181, 399-
434. (b) Hattori, H. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 537-538. (c) Ono, Y.; Baba, T.
Catal. Today 1997, 38, 321-337. (d) Tungler, A.; Fodor, K. Catal. Today
1997, 37, 191-208. (e) Barteau, M. A. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 1413-1430.
3516
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 22, 2001