S. N. Shelke et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 5727–5730
5729
Table 4
(HOD), S.S.G.M. College, Kopargaon, Ahmednagar (MH) for provid-
ing research facilities and constant encouragement.
Minimum inhibitory concentrations of chalcone (3a–e)
and pyrazoline (4a–e) derivatives for M. tuberculosis
H37Rv strain
References and notes
Compound
MICa
M. tuberculosis
37Rv
(lg/mL)
1. Kuznetsova, L.; Ungureanu, M. I.; Pepe, A. J. Fluorine Chem. 2004, 125, 415.
2. Haga, T.; Fujikawa, K.; Koyanag, T.; Nakajima, T.; Hayashi, K. Heterocycles 1984,
22, 117.
3. Shelke, S. N.; Dalvi, N. R.; Kale, B. K.; More, M. S.; Gill, C. H.; Karale, B. K. Ind. J.
Chem. 2007, 46B, 1174.
4. Tuberculosis, WHO Fact sheet No. 104, 2010..
5. Global Tuberculosis Control: Surveillance, Planning, and Financing, WHO
Report, 2008..
H
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
4a
4b
4c
50
6.25
25
10
50
25
10
25
6. Janin, Y. L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 2479.
7. Goldman, R. C.; Plumley, K. V.; Laughon, B. E. Infect. Disord. Drug Targets 2007, 7,
73.
4d
6.25
50
0.20
8. Kumar, S.; Bawa, S.; Drabu, S.; Kumar, R.; Gupta, H. Recent Pat. Antiinfect Drug
Discov. 2009, 4, 154.
9. Taj, T.; Kamble, R. R.; Gireesh, T. M.; Hunnur, R. K.; Margankop, S. B. Eur. J. Med.
Chem. 2011, 46, 4366.
4e
Isoniazidb
a
MIC = Minimum inhibitory concentration, the
10. Sharma, P. K.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, P.; Kaushik, P.; Kaushik, D.; Dhingra, Y.; Aneja,
K. R. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 2650.
lowest concentration of the compound which inhibits
at least 99% of the growth of the mycobacterium.
11. Kumar, P.; Kumar, S.; Husain, K.; Kumar, A. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2011, 22, 37.
12. Handbook on Applications of Ultrasound: Sonochemistry for Sustainability; Chen,
D., Sharma, S. K., Mudhoo, A., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 2012.
13. Shelke, S.; Mhaske, G.; Gadakh, S.; Gill, C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20,
7200.
b
Standard drug.
they showed comparable results with the reference compound
Norfloxacin. It is necessary to mention here that all chalcones
3a–3e exhibited markedly smaller MIC values compared to the ref-
erence compound Gentamycin.
Pyrazoline 4e was active against all four resistant strains, while
4a showed poor inhibitory anti-bacterial activity against S. aureus
and S. pyogenus, as did 4b against E. coli and B. subtilis. The MIC val-
ues of pyrazolines 4a–4e showed higher inhibitory anti-bacterial
activities compared to Ampicillin, Chloramphenicol, Ciprofloxacin
and Norfloxacin, but not compared to Gentamycin.
Antifungal activity: From Table 3, Chalcone 3e showed the high-
est inhibitory anti-fungal activity against C. albicans, while 3d
exhibited the lowest inhibitory antifungal activity against all three
fungal strains. Chalcone 3a exhibited excellent MIC values com-
pared to both reference compounds Greseofulvin and Nystatin
against all three fungal strains, as did 3b against C. albicans, 3c
against A. niger and A. clavatus and 3e against C. albicans. Chalcone
3b showed comparable MIC values compared with both reference
compounds Greseofulvin and Nystatin against A. niger and A. clav-
atus, as did 3c against C. albicans, 3d against all three fungal strains,
and 3e against A. niger and A. clavatus.
Pyrazoline 4e showed markedly high MIC values against all
three fungal strains compared to the reference compounds Greseo-
fulvin and Nystatin. Pyrazolines 4a, 4c and 4b (except against A. ni-
ger and A. clavatus) and 4d (except against C. albicans) also showed
good MIC values compared with the reference compounds.
Anti-tuberculosis activity: As shown in Table 4, chalcone 3b and
pyrazoline 4ddisplayed significantanti-tubercularactivities against
14. Gawande, M. B.; Branco, P. S. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 3355.
15. Pandya, D.; Kim, J.; Kwak, W.; Park, J.; Gawande, M. B.; An, G.; Ryu, E.; Yoo J.
Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2010, 44, 185.
16. Shelke, S.; Salunkhe, N.; Sangale, S.; Bhalerao, S.; Naik, N.; Mhaske, G.; Jadhav,
R.; Karale, B. J. Korean Chem. Soc. 2010, 54, 59.
17. Shelke, S.; Chaudhari, C. S.; Randhavane, P. V.; Nirmal, P. R.; Karale, B. K.; Gill, C.
H. Acta Cienc Indica, Chem. 2008, 34, 503.
18. Kira, M.; Nofal, Z.; Gadalla, K. Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 1970, 48, 4215.
19. Conventional
method:
3-(4-fluorophenyl)-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazole-4-
4-substituted acetophenone (2a–e)
carbaldehyde (1) (0.01 mol) and
a
(0.01 mol) were dissolved in EtOH. A solution of 40% KOH (5 mL) solution
was added and the resulting mixture allowed to stir for 24 h at rt.
Sonochemical
carbaldehyde (1) (0.01 mol) and
(0.01 mol) were dissolved in 5 mL EtOH.
method:
3-(4-fluorophenyl)-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazole-4-
4-substituted acetophenone (2a–e)
solution of KOH (40 wt %,
a
A
0.019 mol, 5 mL) was added, and the resulting mixture subjected to
ultrasonic irradiation (Ultrasonicator model EN-20U-S, manufactured by
Enertech Electronica Pvt., Ltd, Mumbai, India, with
a maximum power
output of 100 W and 33 KHz operating frequency) for 20–25 min at rt. After
completion, the resulting mixture was poured into ice-cold water and then
neutralized with acetic acid. The solid obtained was filtered off, dried and
purified by recrystallization from acetic acid or by column chromatography.
The spectral data for the synthesized compounds are given below.
Compound 3a: Mp 140–142 °C; FT-IR (KBr) vmax (cmÀ1): 1659, 1597, 1214; 1H
NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): 8.33 (1H, s, pyrazole H), 7.96-7.94 (4H, m, ArH),
7.83 (1H, d, J = 15.6 Hz), 7.77–7.13 (11H, m, ArH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-
d6): 189.94, 164.39, 161.92, 152.86, 139.32, 138.14, 135.04, 132.81, 130.63,
130.55, 130.55, 129.62, 128.65, 128.46, 128.43, 128.39, 127.36, 126.88, 121.51,
119.32, 118.17, 115.95, 115.73; MS, ES + 1 mode (m/z): 369.2 (M+1).
Compound 3b: Mp 176–178 °C; FT-IR (KBr) mmax (cmÀ1): 1660, 1599, 1220; 1H
NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): 9.43 (1H, s, pyrazole H), 8.01–7.93 (4H, m, ArH),
7.87 (1H, d, J = 15.4 Hz), 7.73–7.70 (2H, m, ArH), 7.65 (1H, d, J = 15.4 Hz), 7.60–
7.38 (7H, m, ArH), 2.4 (3H, s, CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 189.43,
164.38, 161.91, 152.81, 152.74, 143.66, 139.35, 139.30, 135.54, 134.57, 133.39,
130.63, 130.58, 130.54, 130.50, 129.61, 129.36, 128.53, 128.51, 128.47, 127.37,
127.32, 126.83, 125.23, 121.59, 119.33, 118.25, 118.00, 115.93, 115.72, 21.69;
MS, ES + 1 mode (m/z): 383.8 (M+1).
Compound 3c: Mp 215–217 °C; FT-IR (KBr) mmax (cmÀ1): 1662, 1604, 1213; 1H
NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): 8.96 (1H, s, pyrazole H), 8.13-7.88 (4H, m, ArH)
7.79 (1H, d, J = 15.6 Hz), 7.71–7.69 (2H, m, ArH), 7.65 (1H, d, J = 15.6 Hz), 7.53–
7.18 (7H, m, ArH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 187.33, 166.18, 163.66,
163.64, 161.18, 152.02, 138.82, 134.35, 134.07, 134.04, 130.72, 130.62, 130.12,
130.04, 129.11, 128.18, 128.13, 127.61, 126.75, 120.71, 118.56, 117.59, 115.40,
115.32, 115.18, 115.10; MS, ES + 1 mode (m/z): 387.2 (M+1).
the M. tuberculosis H37Rv strain (MIC = 6.25
hand, chalcone 3a and pyrazoline 4e showed very poor MIC values
compared to the reference compound isoniazid (MIC = 0.20 g/mL).
lg/mL). On the other
l
In summary, ultrasonic irradiation is a green alternative method
to the conventional synthesis of pyrazoline derivatives, for its ease
of operation, lower temperatures, shorter reaction times, and high-
er yields. Novel chalcone and pyrazoline fluorinated derivatives
were screened for their anti-bacterial, anti-fungal and anti-tuber-
cular activities, and the MIC values obtained were compared
against those of standard drugs.
Compound 3d: Mp 220–222 °C; FT-IR (KBr) mmax (cmÀ1): 1659, 1598, 1214; 1H
NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): 8.57 (1H, s, pyrazole H), 7.97–7.18 (15H, m, ArH);
13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 187.84, 163.33, 152.24, 138.65, 138.44, 135.84,
134.81, 130.00, 129.92, 128.98, 128.28, 126.77, 126.69, 120.30, 118.68, 117.41,
115.29, 115.07; MS, ES + 1 mode (m/z): 403.2 (M+1).
Compound 3e: Mp 223–225 °C; FT-IR (KBr) mmax (cmÀ1): 1659, 1598, 1214; 1H
NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): 8.87 (1H, s, pyrazole H), 7.95–7.22 (15H, m, ArH);
13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 188.01, 163.32, 138.83, 136.41, 134.80, 131.35,
130.12, 130.04, 129.58, 129.10, 127.45, 126.81, 120.47, 118.66, 115.39, 115.1;
MS, ES + 1 mode (m/z): 447.2 (M+1)..
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to the Director of the Microcare Labo-
ratory (Surat, India) for the tests of anti-microbial activity. We are
also grateful to the Principal Dr. K. H. Shinde and Dr. A. B. Nikumbh,
20. Conventional method: To a solution of chalcone (0.01 mol) (3a–e) in 10 mL of
ethanol, 1.5 mL (0.048 mol) of hydrazine hydrate (99%) and 2–3 drops of glacial
acetic acid were added dropwise. The reaction mixture was heated under
reflux for 6 h and the progress of the reaction monitored by TLC. After