Chemical Research in Toxicology
Article
In contrast to the kinetic investigations, 10 μM ZEN were used as
the substrate concentration for qualitative analysis to enhance the
signal intensity of the formed metabolites. The reaction was run for a
time period of 120 min and then stopped by addition of 50 μL ice-cold
acetonitrile. Analysis was carried out by high-resolution mass
spectrometry (HRMS). Phase I metabolites were identified by
comparing chromatograms from vehicle control and negative control
incubations to that from incubations in the presence of NADPH.
Furthermore, incubations in the presence of NADPH were compared
to incubations containing NADPH and substrate but without
microsomes. All other conditions were as stated for the kinetic
investigations.
Metabolite Synthesis: α- and β-cis-Zearalenol. In a series of
pretests, standards of α- and β-trans-ZEL were UV-irradiated
separately at λ = 350 nm. Each standard gave rise to one main
irradiation product, which was tentatively assigned α- or β-cis-ZEL,
depending on the configuration of the educt. The maximum cis-ZEL
formation was observed after 24 h for α-trans-ZEL and after 48 h for β-
trans-ZEL. Irradiation in ethyl acetate yielded the highest cis-/trans-
ZEL ratio (α-ZEL, 3.5; β-ZEL, 3.6) when compared to heptane,
acetonitrile, acetone, and methanol, confirming the results of Koppen
et al.19 for ZEN isomerization.
For final synthesis of the cis-ZELs, a two step procedure was
planned using sodium borohydride reduction of trans-ZEN and
subsequent UV radiation. Due to the isomerization equilibrium of the
trans- and cis-ZELs after irradiation, a suitable analytical method was
developed to separate all four ZEL isomers in one run (Figure 2). The
chromatographic system consisted of a SpectraSystem HPLC
(Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) including a pump
P4000, a degasser SCM 1000F, an autosampler AS3000F, a DAD
UV6000LP, and a FLD Surveyor Plus with a Eurospher II 100-3 C18 P
column (150 × 2 mm, 3 μm particle size; Knauer GmbH, Berlin,
Germany). A 50 °C oven temperature, an injection volume of 10 μL, a
flow rate of 0.4 mL/min, and a runtime of 30 min were employed.
Methanol/water 45:55 (v/v) containing 0.1% formic acid was used as
isocratic elution solvent. The DAD was set to λ = 274 nm, and
fluorescence detection was done at λEx = 274 nm and λEm = 456 nm.
Final synthesis of both cis-ZEL isomers was carried out with 38 mg
of NaBH4 (1.0 mmol), which was added to a solution of 25 mg of
trans-ZEN (0.9 mmol) in 10 mL of methanol. After 15 min at room
temperature, the reaction was stopped by dropwise addition of acetic
acid (25% in water) until no further gas formation could be observed.
The completion of the reaction was confirmed by HPLC-FLD
(chromatography conditions as stated above). The ratio of α- to β-
trans-ZEL was calculated from HPLC-DAD peak area (λ = 274 nm) as
33:67. The solution was evaporated to dryness, redissolved in ethyl
acetate, and split into 10 fractions in clear glass HPLC vials, which
were directly exposed to UV light (λ = 350 nm). The exposure was
carried out for 24 h using a universal UV lamp, type TL-900
(CAMAG, Muttenz, Switzerland). The generated cis isomers were
purified from the trans isomers using the chromatographic conditions
described above with the HPLC system connected to an automatic
fraction collector Foxy Jr. (Teledyne Isco, Lincoln, NE, USA). The
purification yielded 5.6 mg (22%) of α-cis-ZEL in a purity > 94% and
7.0 mg of β-cis-ZEL in a purity > 99%. Purities were determined by
HPLC-UV analysis at λ = 274 nm.
α-cis-ZEL. δ (ppm) 1.24−1.82 (m, 10H, H-4, H-5, H-6, H-8, H-9),
1.35 (d, 3H, -CH3, J = 6.2 Hz), 2.28 (m, 2H, H-10), 3.75 (m, 1H, H-
7), 5.15 (m, 1H, H-3, J = 6.2 Hz), 5.57 (ddd, 1H, H-11, J = 11.5, 11.2,
4
3.8 Hz), 6.14 (d, 1H, H-15, J(13,15) = 2.5 Hz), 6.23 (d, 1H, H-13,
4J(13,15) = 2.5 Hz), 6.71 (d, 1H, H-12, J(12,11) = 11.5 Hz).
β-trans-ZEL. δ (ppm) 1.29−1.79 (m, 10H, H-4, H-5, H-6, H-8, H-
9), 1.34 (d, 3H, -CH3, J = 6.2 Hz), 2.28 (m, 2H, H-10), 3.71 (m, 1H,
H-7), 5.12 (m, 1H, H-3, J = 6.3 Hz), 5.96 (ddd, 1H, H-11, J = 15.5,
4
8.4, 6.0 Hz), 6.21 (d, 1H, H-15, J(13,15) = 2.5 Hz), 6.44 (d, 1H, H-13,
4J(13,15) = 2.5 Hz), 6.72 (d, 1H, H-12, J(12,11) = 15.6 Hz).
β-cis-ZEL. δ (ppm) 1.28−1.69 (m, 10H, H-4, H-5, H-6, H-8, H-9),
1.36 (d, 3H, −CH3, J = 6.5 Hz), 2.17 (m, 2H, H-10), 3.60 (m, 1H, H-
7), 5.34 (m, 1H, H-3, J = 6.5 Hz), 5.60 (ddd, 1H, H-11, J = 11.5, 10.1,
4
5.1 Hz), 6.14 (d, 1H, H-15, J(13,15) = 2.5 Hz), 6.22 (d, 1H, H-13,
4J(13,15) = 2.5 Hz), 6.72 (d, 1H, H-12, J(12,11) = 11.5 Hz).
HPLC-MS Analysis. HPLC-MS/MS. Kinetic experiments were
analyzed on an Agilent 1200 series HPLC coupled to an API 4000
QTRAP hybrid mass spectrometer (AB Sciex, Foster City, USA). A
Gemini-NX C18 column (150 mm × 2 mm, 3 μm particle size;
Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany) was used with a flow rate of
0.25 mL/min and an oven temperature of 50 °C. The mobile phase
consisted of water with 0.1% formic acid (A) and methanol containing
0.1% formic acid (B). A gradient program was used starting at 50%
mobile phase B. Within 17 min, B was raised to 60%, followed by an
increase to 100% at minute 18. Afterwards, the column was re-
equilibrated to starting conditions for 5 min. HPLC-MS/MS runtime
was 24 min per sample, and the injection volume was set to 10 μL.
The mass spectrometer was operated in multiple reaction
monitoring (MRM) mode with negative electrospray ionization
(ESI). For both native ZEN isomers, the monitored transitions were
(m/z) 317.1 → 131.1 (quantifier) and 317.1 → 175.0 (qualifier). For
the two internal standards, U-[13C18]-ZEN (m/z) 335.2 → 140.2 was
monitored. trans- and cis-ZEN were separated by chromatography and
assigned via retention times.
The following ion source parameters were used: ion spray voltage,
−4000 V; desolvation temperature, 450 °C; ion source gas, 1:60; ion
source gas, 2:60; curtain gas, 20. The optimized MRM compound-
specific parameters were (quantifier/qualifier/internal standard):
declustering potential, −65/−65/−65 V; entrance potential, −10/−
10/−10 V; collision energy, −40/−34/−40 V; collision cell exit
potential, −9/−6/−9 V; dwell time, 50/50/50 ms. Data acquisition
was done using Analyst 1.6.2 software (AB Sciex, Foster City, CA,
USA).
HRMS. Qualitative metabolite profiling and accurate mass based
analyses were done on an Agilent 1290 Infinity UPLC coupled to an
Agilent 6230 accurate-mass time-of-flight MS. The column oven was
set to 50 °C. Separation of the metabolites was achieved on an
Ascentis Express F5 column (150 mm × 3 mm, 2.7 μm particle size;
Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany). The Ascentis F5 column
separated trans- and cis-ZEN as well as the cis and trans isomers of
α- and β-ZEL using water with 0.1% formic acid (A) and methanol
containing 0.1% formic acid (B) as solvents in a gradient program at a
flow rate of 0.35 mL/min. A linear gradient was applied starting from
50% B to 70% at minute 18. Then, the column was re-equilibrated for
8 min.
For ESI operation, nitrogen was used as the drying gas (350 °C, 10
L/min) and nebulizer gas (35 psi). The capillary, skimmer, and
octapole RF voltages were set at 3.7 kV, 65 V, and 750 V, respectively.
Data was acquired in the negative ionization mode within a range of 75
to 500 m/z. Automatic calibration was enabled by continuous
postcolumn infusion of calibrant solution. Data analysis was done
using MassHunter 6.0. Determination of the elemental composition of
individual metabolites was based on accurate masses, typically better
than 10 ppm mass accuracy.
The accurate mass of the cis-ZELs was determined by HRMS (m/z
319.157 for both) and matches the calculated exact mass for ZEL.
Furthermore, the configuration of the double bond C11−C12 was
resolved by 1H NMR. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker DMX-
400 or a Bruker AVANCE III 500 spectrometer (Bruker Daltonik,
Bremen, Germany) in CD3OD. Proton chemical shifts were referenced
to residual native methanol at 3.31 ppm. Complete assignments for
proton resonances were performed in accordance to previously
published works on α- and β-trans-ZEL.23
α-trans-ZEL. δ (ppm) 1.16−1.94 (m, 10H, H-4, H-5, H-6, H-8, H-
9), 1.39 (d, 3H, -CH3, J = 6.1 Hz), 2.32 (m, 2H, H-10), 3.76 (m, 1H,
H-7), 4.96 (m, 1H, H-3), 5.70 (ddd, 1H, H-11, J = 15.4, 9.9, 4.6 Hz),
6.22 (d, 1H, H-15, 4J(13,15) = 2.5 Hz), 6.37 (d, 1H, H-13, 4J(13,15) = 2.5
Hz), 7.12 (d, 1H, H-12, J(12,11) = 15.4 Hz).
RESULTS
■
Depletion Kinetics. In the presence of NADPH, cis-ZEN is
rapidly metabolized by rat liver microsomes (RLM) and human
liver microsomes (HLM), which can be seen by the decrease of
1974
dx.doi.org/10.1021/tx500312g | Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2014, 27, 1972−1978