CuII-Mediated Autoxidation of tert-Butylresorcinols
extracted with EtOAc (3 × 50 mL). The combined organic layer
was dried (Na2SO4), evaporated to a small volume, and diluted
to 50 mL with EtOAc. A 5 mL aliquot of the latter solution
(corresponding to 0.5 mmol of starting 1) was utilized for the
1H NMR spectral determination (CDCl3) of the percent conver-
sion of 1 and the yield of products, with 138 mg (1 mmol) of
1,4-dimethoxybenzene being added as an internal standard
(Table 2). The remainder of the EtOAc solution (45 mL) was
evaporated and separated by silica gel column chromatography
using hexanes and EtOAc as eluents to give 5, 1, and 2. Data
for compound 5: white amorphous solid; IR (KBr) νmax/cm-1
3404 (br, OH), 1802 (s, CdO), 1706 (s, CdO); 1H NMR (DMSO-
d6) δ 0.97 (s, 9H), 1.33 (s, 9H), 2.58 (d, 1H, J ) 18.7 Hz), 2.77
(d, 1H, J ) 18.7 Hz), 6.69 (s, 1H), 7.01 (s, 1H), 9.90 (s, 1H,
OH), 9.99 (s, 1H, OH); 13C NMR (APT, DMSO-d6) δ 27.4 (-),
29.5 (-), 34.4 (+), 34.6 (+), 46.0 (+), 51.3 (+), 99.1 (-), 119.3
(+), 121.2 (-), 132.5 (+), 147.2 (+), 151.1 (+), 152.5 (+), 157.1
(+), 179.6 (+), 199.5 (+); HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C20H24O5
344.1624, found 344.1630 (rel intens 52).
HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C14H20O3 236.1412, found 236.1419
(rel intens 60).
Essentially the same result was obtained when the above
reaction was carried out in 1:1 acetonitrile-water with pH 10
(Table 2). No reaction occurred in the presence of diethylene-
triaminepentaacetic acid.
Cop p er (II)-Ca ta lyzed Oxid a tion of 1 a n d 9 in Aceto-
n itr ile Usin g 18O2. To a 50 mL round-bottomed two-necked
flask fitted with a vacuum line and a septum was injected 20
mL of a CH3CN solution of either 1 or 9 (10 mM) containing
100 mM 16OH2. The solution was deaerated by three freeze-
pump-thaw cycles under argon, with 18O2 (95% 18O mixed 4:1
with N2, 1 atm, Icon Services, Summit, NJ ) being admitted in
the fourth cycle. Argon was further admitted to maintain a
slightly positive pressure. After vigorous stirring for 5 min,
0.5 mL of a degassed solution of Cu(CF3SO3)2 (400 mM) in CH3-
CN was injected through the septum, and the reaction was
initiated by injecting a degassed methanolic solution of 2 M
NaOMe (0.30 mL for 1 or 0.25 mL for 9). The reaction mixture
was vigorously stirred for 10 min before quenching by injection
of a degassed aqueous solution of NaH2PO4 (40 mM, 20 mL)
followed immediately by addition of NaBH4 in small portions
over 1 min with vigorous stirring until the red color of the
quinone faded. The mixture was then adjusted to pH 2 with
0.1 N aqueous HCl, diluted with 50 mL of water, and then
extracted with CH2Cl2 (50 mL). The combined organic layer
was dried (Na2SO4) and evaporated. TLC analysis showed that
triol 26 was the major product in both cases. The crude product
mixtures were then subjected to mass spectral analysis. HRMS
(FAB) m/z (rel intens) calcd for C10H1416O3 and C10H1418O16O2
(M+), 182.0943 and 184.0986, found 182.0931 (100) and
184.0980 (39) for reaction of 1 and 182.0930 (34) and 184.0982
Essentially the same results were obtained using Cu(ClO4)2‚
6H2O instead of CuSO4 as catalyst (Table 2).
An a er obic Oxid a tion of 1 by Cop p er (II) in Aqu eou s
Aceton itr ile. A solution of 1 (332 mg, 2 mmol) and Cu(ClO4)2‚
6H2O (740 mg, 2 mmol) in 200 mL of acetonitrile-water (1:1,
v/v) was placed in a three-necked round-bottom flask with an
electromagnetic stirrer, fitted with a dropping funnel contain-
ing 0.1 M aqueous NaOH and a pH electrode with a septum
seal. The middle neck contained a septum with inlet and outlet
needles. The solution was first bubbled with argon for 30 min
under continuous stirring, and then aqueous NaOH was slowly
introduced from the dropping funnel until the pH reached 10.
The mixture immediately turned to yellow-brown, and the pH
was maintained at 10 throughout the reaction course by
adding NaOH. After 3 h, the mixture was acidified with 1 M
aqueous HCl to pH 2 and then evaporated under reduced
pressure to remove the acetonitrile. The aqueous solution was
extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL), and the organic layer was
dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated to 50 mL. A 5 mL aliquot
was removed for NMR spectral analysis. The remainder of the
solution was evaporated and separated by silica gel column
chromatography with hexanes and EtOAc as eluent to afford
(100) for reaction of 9. The mass peak representing C10H14
18O16O2 was distinct from the expected M + 2 satellite of
10H1416O3 so that no correction was needed. A control experi-
-
C
ment using air instead of 18O2 confirmed the absence of
C
10H1418O16O2 by HRMS in both cases.
Cop p er (II)-Ca ta lyzed Rea ction of Hyd r oxyqu in on e 2
or Tr iol 26 w ith 4 in Aqu eou s Aceton itr ile. A mixture of
either 2 (36.0 mg, 0.20 mmol) or 26 (36.4 mg, 0.20 mmol) with
4 (25.2 mg, 0.20 mmol) and Cu(ClO4)2‚6H2O (7.5 mg, 0.02
mmol) in 10 mL of acetonitrile-water (1:1) was adjusted to
pH 10.0 with 4 N NaOH and was maintained at pH 10 with
stirring for 30 min before quenching with dilute HCl to pH
3.0. The solution was extracted with EtOAc (15 mL). The
organic layer was dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated to give a
1
1, 11, and 12. Data for dimer 11: white amorphous solid; H
NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.38 (s, 18H), 5.25 (br, 2H, OH), 5.75 (br, 2H,
OH), 6.36 (s, 2H), 7.08 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (APT, CDCl3) δ 29.9
(-), 34.2 (+), 104.6 (-), 115.0 (+), 129.8 (-), 130.0 (+), 151.7
(+), 155.3 (+); HRMS (FAB) m/z calcd for C20H26O4 (M+)
330.1831, found 330.1826 (rel intens 93). Data for Pummerer’s
ketone 12: white amorphous solid; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.05
(s, 9H), 1.36 (s, 9H), 2.75 (dd, 1H, J ) 4.0, 15.5 Hz), 2.92 (dd,
1H, J ) 6.2, 15.5 Hz), 3.18 (d, 1H, J ) 19.5 Hz), 3.33 (d, 1H,
J ) 19.5 Hz), 5.24 (dd, 1H, J ) 4.0, 6.2 Hz), 5.32 (br, 1H, OH),
6.36 (s, 1H), 7.21 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (APT, CDCl3) δ 26.0 (-),
29.9 (-), 34.4 (+), 37.3 (+), 46.9 (+), 55.7 (+), 67.7 (+), 81.8
(-), 98.9 (-), 117.1 (+), 125.0 (-), 129.6 (+), 156.4 (+), 158.3
(+), 202.5 (+), 203.1 (+); HRMS (FAB) m/z calcd for C20H26O4
(M+) 330.1831, found 330.1825 (rel intens 15).
1
crude product mixture. H NMR spectral analysis revealed 2
and 3 in a ratio of 1:1 as the only identified products. Starting
with 26, the yield of the mixture of 2 and 3 was 66%, on the
basis of integration of the eight tert-butyl signals observed in
the crude 1H NMR spectrum (estimated from peak heights;
none of the unidentified products were present to an extent of
>10%). Starting with 2, the yield was 3-fold lower, and when
either reaction was conducted under identical conditions but
the starting concentrations were reduced by 13-fold, the yield
of the 1:1 mixture of 2 and 3 was reduced in each case more
than 2-fold, and the unidentified side products became much
more numerous. The same reaction as described above in the
absence of CuII gave 2 as the major product by far, only a trace
of 3, and several unidentified products.
Cop p er (II)-Ca ta lyzed Oxid a tion of 9. A mixture of 0.1
M pH 11 sodium phosphate buffer solution (500 mL), 9
(dihydrate, 1.29 g, 5 mmol, first dissolved in a small volume
of methanol), and 500 µL (0.5 mmol) of 1 M aqueous CuSO4
was stirred vigorously in air for 1.5 h, titrated with 0.1 M
aqueous HCl to pH 2, and then extracted with EtOAc (3 × 50
mL). The combined organic layer was dried (Na2SO4), evapo-
rated to a small volume, and diluted to 50 mL with EtOAc. A
Cop p er (II)-Ca ta lyzed Rea ction of Hyd r oxyqu in on e 2
or Tr iol 26 w ith 2,5-Dih yd r oxy-1,4-ben zoqu in on e (36) in
Aqu eou s Aceton itr ile. An equimolar mixture of either 2 or
26 with 36 in acetonitrile-water (1:1) at a final concentration
of either 1.5 or 20 mM, in the absence or presence of 0.1 equiv
of Cu(ClO4)2‚6H2O, was adjusted to and maintained at pH 10.0
by addition of 4 N NaOH. After 30 min, the reaction was
directly extracted (20 mM reaction) with EtOAc or first
concentrated and then extracted (1.5 mM reaction), and the
organic layer was dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated to give a
1
small aliquot was applied for H NMR spectral determination
as shown above, while the remainder of the solution was
separated by column chromatography on silica gel using
hexanes and EtOAc as eluents to afford 2 and 10. Data for
compound 10: red oil; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.28 (s, 9H), 1.37 (s,
9H), 6.50 (s, 1H), 7.20 (s, exchangeable by D2O, 1H, OH); 13C
NMR (APT, CDCl3) δ 29.6 (-), 30.3 (-), 35.5 (+), 36.2 (+),
125.1 (-), 129.2 (+), 148.9 (+), 162.4 (+), 184.5 (+), 189.3 (+);
1
crude product mixture. H NMR spectral analysis revealed 2
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 68, No. 4, 2003 1365