filtration.7 The increasing demands of higher diastereo- and
enantioselectivity in the combinatorial/drug discovery area
are now just beginning to lead investigators to seek new
methods of incorporating asymmetry into polymer-supported
transformations.7b-d
enhanced as a result of the use of a combination of low
temperatures, Lewis acids, and appended chiral auxiliaries,
scaffolds, and templates.10 For example, radical cyclizations
with chiral auxiliaries such as oxazolidinones, sulfoxides,
and chiral esters have investigated.10d-f An important objec-
tive in our studies was to study radical cyclizations using a
removable carbohydrate on designer support as a stereocon-
trol element.11 Although carbohydrate auxiliaries not on
polymer support have been studied with many varieties of
reactions, they have not been systematically studied in radical
cyclizations or on support. In general, we hoped that this
would offer a well-documented and reliable means of radical
carbon-carbon bond formation.
In this study, 6-heptenyl radical cyclizations were exam-
ined on a new custom-synthesized designer support by
mounting each reaction on a soluble succinimide-derived
ROMP backbone, shown as 1 f 2 in Scheme 1.8
A
Scheme 1
Our studies on stereoselective and polymer-supported
radical cyclizations began with the construction of a meta-
thesis monomer. This would then be tethered to polymer-
supported norborene imide by a short series of four meth-
ylene units. All of the important structural features for the
6-heptenyl radical reaction were to be covalently secured
into the polymer backbone before polymerization of the
norborene ring system. This is done to ensure that each
monomer contains a cyclization precursor and, thus, increase
the loading on the polymer to an absolute maximum. In other
words, each monomer unit contains a reaction site integrated
into the backbone so that this designer polymer essentially
has 100% loading capacity. Standard solid-phase resins
cannot achieve this level of loading mainly because the
substrate is incompletely covalently attached to the polymer.
With the methodology discussed herein, the substrate is
always completely incorporated into each monomer and then
subsequently polymerized.
We decided to use norbornyl monomers in these studies
because they polymerize readily by ring-opening metathesis
with Grubbs’ well-defined ruthenium catalysts.12 The small
amount of strain inherent with norbornenes assists and
accelerates the metathesis.13 Moreover, a wide variety of
norbornenes are commercially available or readily prepared
by Diels-Alder reactions.
Diol 4 was constructed initially in 79% yield (two steps)
from 1,2-dihydronaphthalene (3) by ozonolysis and reductive
workup with sodium borohydride, as shown in Scheme 2.
stereocontrol element (R*) consisting of a polymer-imbedded
(+)-isosorbide chiral auxiliary was used in each monomer
subunit. Very high diastereoselectivites of >100:1 were
observed in the cyclization using zinc chloride as a Lewis
acid and >99% enantiomeric excess was achieved after
cleavage from the support. A survey of various solvent
systems, radical initiators, temperatures, and Lewis acids
resulted in highly diastereoselective cyclic products. It is
worth noting that this work contains the first examples of
asymmetric radical cyclizations on soluble support.8
Radical reactions offer synthetic benefits such as neutral
reaction conditions and tolerance of various functional groups
and protecting schemes.9 New studies have shown the
diastereoselectivity of free radical reactions is greatly
(9) (a) Giese, B. Radicals in Organic Synthesis: Formation of Carbon-
Carbon Bonds; Pergamon Press: New York, 1986. (b) Ramaiah, M.
Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 3541. (c) Curran, D. P. Synthesis 1988, 417, 489.
(d) Hart, D. J. Science 1984, 223, 883. (e) Motherwell, W. B.; Crich, D.
Free Radical Chain Reactions in Organic Synthesis; Academic Press: New
York, 1992.
(10) (a) Murakata, M.; Jono, T.; Mizuno, Y.; Hoshino, O. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 11713. (b) Porter, N. A.; Giese, B.; Curran, D. P. Acc.
Chem. Res. 1991, 24, 296 and references therein. (c) Renaud, P.; Gerster,
M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 2562. (d) Nishida, M.; Hayashi,
H.; Yamaura, Y.; Yanaginuma, E.; Yone-mitsu, O. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995,
36, 269. (e) Nishida, M.; Ueyama, E.; Hayashi, H.; Ohtake, Y.; Yamaura,
Y.; Yanaginuma, E.; Yonemutsu, O.; Nishida, A.; Kawahara, N. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 6455. (f) Badone, D.; Bernassau, J.-M.; Cardamone,
R.; Guzzi, U. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 535.
(11) Enholm, E. J.; Cottone, J. S.; Allais, F. Org. Lett. 2000, 3, 145.
(12) (a) Maughon, B. R.; Grubbs, R. H. Macromolecules 1997, 30, 3459-
3469. (b) Scholl, M.; Ding, S.; Lee, C. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett. 2000,
1, 953-956. Chang, S.; Jones, L.; Wang, C. M.; Henling, L. M.; Grubbs,
R. H. Organometallics 1998, 17, 3460-3465.
(13) Makovetsky, K. L.; Finkelshtein, E. S.; Ostrovskaya, I. Y.; Portnykh,
E. B.; Gorbacheva, L. I.; Goldberg, A. L.; Ushakov, N. V.; Yampolsky, Y.
P. J. Mol. Catal. 1992, 76, 107-121.
(7) (a) Lei, M.; Wang, Y. G.Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 21, 436. (b)
Allin, S. M. Shuttleworth, S. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 8023. (c) Moon,
H.; Schore, N. E.; Kurth, M. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 8915. (d) Moon,
H. S.; Schore, N. E.; Kurth, M. J. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 6088. (e) Wu,
W. X.; McPhail, A. T.; Porter, N. A. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 1302.
(8) For examples of radical reactions on commercial resin supports,
see: (a) Sibi, M. P.; Chandramouli, S. V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997 38, 8929-
8932. (b) Miyabe, H.; Konishi, C.; Naito, T. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1443-
1445. (c) Jia, G. F.; Iida, H.; Lown, J. W. Synlett 2000, 603-606. (d)
Wendeborn, S.; De Mesmaeker, A.; Brill, W. K. D.; Berteina, S. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2000, 215-224. (e) Jeon, G. H.; Yoon, J. Y.; Kim, S.; Kim, S. S.
Synlett 2000, 128-130. (f) Miyabe, H.; Ueda, M.; Yoshioka, N.; Yamakawa,
K.; Naito, T. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 2413-2420. (g) Miyabe, H.; Tanaka,
H.; Naito, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 8387-8390. (h) Caddick, S.;
Hamza, D.; Wadman, S. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 7285-7288. (i)
Berteina, S.; De Mesmaeker, A.; Wendeborn, S.; Synlett 1999, 1121-1123.
(j) Zhu, X. W.; Ganesan, A. J. Comb. Chem. 1999, 1, 157-162. (k) Yim,
A. M.; Vidal, Y.; Viallefont, P.; Martinez, J.; Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40,
4535-4538. (l) Miyabe, H.; Fujishima, Y.; Naito, T. J. Org. Chem. 2000,
64, 2174-2175. (m) Watanabe, Y.; Ishikawa, S.; Takao, G.; Toru, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3411-3414. (n) Berteina, S.; Wendeborn, S.;
De Mesmaeker, A. Synlett 1998, 1231-1233.
3960
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 24, 2001