Study of Iron(IV) and Manganese(IV) Corroles
J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 105, No. 46, 2001 11407
TABLE 1: Half-Wave Potentials (V vs SCE) for
[FeIVT(p-X-P)C]Cl, [FeIVT(p-X-P)C]2O, and
[MnIVT(p-X-P)C]Cl (X ) CH3, H, CF3) in CH2Cl2
Containing 0.1 M TBAPa
corrole
X
3σ
E1/2ox
E1/2red
FeIV[T(p-X-P)C]Cl
CH3
H
CF3
CH3
H
CF3
CH3
H
-0.51
0
1.62
-0.51
0
1.62
-0.51
0
1.015
1.068
1.178
0.593
0.635
0.830
0.970
1.032
1.150
0.033
0.050
0.190
-0.350
-0.305
-0.115
0.072
[FeIVT(p-X-P)C]2O
MnIV[T(p-X-P)C]Cl
0.093
0.230
CF3
1.62
a A scan rate of 0.1 Vs-1 was used. See also Figures 2, 3, and 4 for
additional redox potential data.
Figure 1. Compounds studied in this work; X ) CH3, H, and CF3.
rolic), 7.09 (d, J ) 6.9 Hz, 2H, phenyl), 7.03 (d, J ) 4.5 Hz,
4H, phenyl and/or â-pyrrolic), 6.84 (d, J ) 4.5 Hz, 4H, phenyl
and/or â-pyrrolic), 2.51 (s, 12H, p-CH3), 2.46 (s, 6H, p-CH3).
λmax (log ꢀ/(M-1cm-1)): 389 nm (4.94).
in refluxing DMF. Elemental analyses and MALDI-TOF mass
spectra of all compounds prepared were as expected on the basis
of the molecular formulas. Proton NMR (CDCl3, room tem-
perature) data for the iron compounds, along with proposed
assignments, and UV-vis absorption spectroscopic data (in
dichloromethane) are as follows. The NMR spectra and a
discussion of the proposed assignments are given in the
Supporting Information. The Mn(IV) Cl corrole complexes gave
rise to broad, paramagnetically shifted peaks in the proton NMR
spectra, which have not yet been assigned.
(T(p-CF3-P)C)MnIVCl. λmax (log ꢀ/(M-1cm-1)): 316 (4.32),
364 (4.40), 423 nm (4.62).
(TPC)MnIVCl. λmax (log ꢀ/(M-1cm-1)): 314 (4.37), 358
(4.44), 433 nm (4.66).
(T(p-CH3-P)C)MnIVCl. λmax (log ꢀ/(M-1cm-1)): 319 (4.40),
363 (4.47), 443 nm (4.64).
Cyclic voltammetry was carried out using an EG&G Model
263A Potensiostat with a three-electrode system consisting of
a glassy carbon working electrode, a platinum wire counter-
electrode and a saturated calomel reference electrode (SCE).
Tetra(n-butyl)ammonium perchlorate (TBAP) recrystallized
from ethanol and dried in a vacuum for at least one week was
used as supporting electrolyte. Dichloromethane, distilled and
kept over molecular sieves, was used as solvent. The reference
electrode was separated from bulk solution by a fritted-glass
bridge filled with the solvent/supporting electrolyte mixture, and
all potentials were referenced to the SCE. Pure nitrogen was
bubbled though solutions containing the metallocorroles for at
least 2 min prior to running the experiments and the solutions
were also protected from air by a nitrogen blanket during the
experiment.
DFT calculations on (corrolato)MX complexes (M ) Fe, Mn;
X ) Cl, OLi) were carried out using Slater-type valence triple-ú
plus polarization basis sets, the VWN local functional, the
Perdew-Wang 1991 gradient corrections, a spin-unrestricted
formalism, a fine mesh for numerical integration of matrix
elements, full geometry optimizations with Cs symmetry
constraints, and the ADF10 program system.
Electrochemical Results. Table 1 presents the oxidation and
reduction potential data for the iron and manganese corroles
prepared. The corresponding cyclic voltammograms are shown
in Figure 2, 3, and 4. Figure 5, 6, and 7 shows Hammett plots
for the redox potentials of the Fe(IV) corrole chloride, the Fe(IV)
corrole µ-oxo dimer, and the Mn(IV) corrole chloride series,
respectively.
The oxidation potentials of the Fe(IV) corrole chloride
complexes are considerably higher than those of the corre-
sponding Fe(IV) corrole µ-oxo dimers. This suggests that the
nature of the one-electron oxidation is different in the two
families of compounds. The oxidation potentials of the Fe(IV)
corrole µ-oxo dimers are comparable to those observed for the
corresponding Cu(III) corroles (e.g., E1/2ox (CuIIITPC) ) 0.76
V vs SCE).11 Because the electrochemical generation of Cu(IV)
and Fe(V) corroles is unlikely, we propose that the Fe(IV)
1
(T(p-CF3-P)C)FeIVCl. H NMR: 24.0 (s, 2H, â-pyrrolic),
22.8 (s, 2H, â-pyrrolic), 22.0 (s, 2H, â-pyrrolic), 5.55 (s, 2 H,
â-pyrrolic or o-phenyl), -1.75 (s, 2H, m-phenyl), -1.95 (s, 2H
m-phenyl), -2.77 (s, 1H m-phenyl), -2.87 (s, 1H m-phenyl),
-6.29 (s, 2H, o-phenyl), -6.78 (s, 2H, o-phenyl), -39.8 (s, 2
H, â-pyrrolic or o-phenyl). λmax (log ꢀ/(M-1cm-1)): 366 nm
(4.60), 402 nm (4.72).
1
(TPC)FeIVCl. H NMR: 25.2 (s, 2H, â-pyrrolic), 24.0 (s,
2H, â-pyrrolic), 23.1 (s, 2H, â-pyrrolic), 19.6 (s, 2H, p-phenyl),
17.2 (s, 1H, p-phenyl), 6.01 (s, 2H, â-pyrrolic or o-phenyl),
-2.56 (s, 2H, m-phenyl), -2.85 (s, 2H, m-phenyl), -3.71 (s,
1H, m-phenyl), -3.91 (s, 1H, m-penyl), -5.79 (s, 2H, o-phenyl),
-6.94 (s, 2H, o-phenyl), -41.1 (s, 2H, â-pyrrolic or o-phenyl?).
λmax (log ꢀ/(M-1cm-1)): 359 nm (4.53), 411 nm (4.63).
1
(T(p-CH3-P)C)FeIVCl. H NMR. 26.0 (s, 2H, â-pyrrolic),
24.7 (s, 2H, â-pyrrolic), 23.9 (s, 2H, â-pyrrolic), 5.75 (s, 2H,
â-pyrrolic or o-phenyl), -3.23 (s, 2H, m-phenyl), -3.38 (s, 2H,
m-phenyl), -4.51 (s, 1H, m-phenyl), -4.67 (s, 1H, m-phenyl),
-5.41 (s, 2H, o-phenyl), -7.25 (s, 2H, o-phenyl), -9.61 (s,
3H, p-CH3), -11.9 (s, 6H, p-CH3), -41.4 (s, 2H, â-pyrrolic or
o-phenyl). λmax (log ꢀ/(M-1cm-1)): 361 nm (4.60), 421 nm
(4.61).
[(T(p-CF3-P)C)FeIV]2O. 1H NMR. 7.71-7.77 (m, 10H,
phenyl), 7.64 (d, J ) 6.7 Hz, 4H, phenyl), 7.59 (d, J ) 7.3 Hz,
2H, phenyl), 7.52 (d, J ) 7.3, 6H,9 phenyl), 7.35 (d, J ) 4.3
Hz, 4H, â-pyrrolic), 7.24 (d, J ) 4.9 Hz, 4H, â-pyrrolic), 7.11
(d, J ) 7.9 Hz, 2H, phenyl), 6.94 (d, J ) 4.3 Hz, 4H, â-pyrrolic),
6.76 (d, J ) 4.9 Hz, 4H, â-pyrrolic). λmax (log ꢀ/(M-1cm-1)):
384 nm (5.03).
1
[(TPC)FeIV]2O. H NMR. 7.61 (s, 4H, phenyl), 7.37-7.54
(m, 22H, phenyl and â-pyrrolic), 7.29 (m, 8H, phenyl and/or
â-pyrrolic), 7.25 (d, J ) 7.3 Hz, 2H, phenyl), 7.11 (d, J ) 7.3
Hz, 2H, phenyl), 7.00 (d, J ) 4.9 Hz, 4H, â-pyrrolic), 6.83 (d,
J ) 4.9 Hz, 4H, â-pyrrolic). λmax (log ꢀ/(M-1cm-1)): 385 nm
(5.09).
1
[(T(p-CH3-P)C)FeIV]2O. H NMR. 7.29-7.49 (m, 26H,
phenyl and/or â-pyrrolic), 7.21 (m, 4H, phenyl and/or â-pyr-