10.1002/adsc.201800260
Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis
5 did not lead to any trace of anilinophenazine 4aaa, is highly advantageous as some nitro derivatives are
this possibility was ruled out.
less expensive and more readily available than their
aniline analogs. Although sulfur could act as a
catalyst in this reaction, its catalytic activity is far
from efficient to be used in catalytic amount.
Scheme 5. Control experiment
In the present stage, our observations are consistent
with the reaction pathway presented in Scheme 6. As
previously described, the first step would be the
formation tetrahydrophenazine 5. The next step could
be a dearomatizing tautomerization of 5 into A. As a
Michael acceptor, A would subject to a nucleophilic
attack by aniline 3, leading to adduct B. Subsequent
sequential aromatization of B and C would provide 1-
anilinophenazine 4. The determining step is obviously
the Michael addition of 3 to A, which depends on
steric hindrance of both aniline and A.[8]
Scheme 8. Reactions with 2a and ArNH2/ArNO2
In conclusion, we have described a conceptually
simple but highly unusual strategy that allows a rapid
assembly of a new class of functionalized 1-
anilinophenazines. This reaction was achieved
through the formation of three C-N bonds and the
sequential double aromatization in a single operation.
The method represents
a
rare example of
multicomponent process for one-step construction of
complex structures starting from very simple starting
materials
such
as
cyclohexane-1,2-
diones/cyclohexanones, o-phenylenediamines and
anilines/nitrobenzenes. Once again, the method
highlights the usefulness of elemental sulfur as an
excellent synthetic tool for organic chemistry. Further
developments of such strategy with sulfur are ongoing
in our laboratory and the results will be reported in
due course.
Scheme 6. Proposed mechanism
The versatility of our approach was further
demonstrated with aliphatic amines 8a-8c (Scheme
7). To our delight, the expected products 9aaa-9aac
were obtained under the standard reaction conditions,
with better yields for less hindered primary amines.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. A. Marinetti (Institut de Chimie des Substances
Naturelles) for her support.
References
[1] For reviews, see: a) C. Sambiagio, S. P. Marsden, A. J.
Blacker, P. C. McGowan, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43,
3525; b) A. R. Muci and S. L. Buchwald, Top. Curr.
Chem. 2002, 219, 131; c) J. F. Hartwig, Acc. Chem. Res.
2008, 41, 1534.
Scheme 7. Reactions with selected aliphatic amines 8
To complete our investigation, we applied
cyclohexanone as an inexpensive precursor for the
ring A of phenazine 4 (Scheme 8, eq. 1). Its reaction
with o-phenylenediamine 1a and m-toluidine 3c at
100 °C provided the expected phenazine 4aac in 42%
yield. Moreover, because hydrogen sulfide is a by-
product of the reaction, it is desirable to limit its
formation. By using nitrobenzene 10a as a less
expensive surrogate of aniline 1a, we could obtain the
phenazine product 4aaa while lowering the formation
of H2S from 5 equiv to only 2 equiv as 3 equiv was
used for reduction of the nitro group (eq. 2).
Additionally, from practical standpoint, this approach
[2] For an excellent review on recent developments in the
isolation, biological function, biosynthesis and
synthesis of natural products bearing a phenazine motif,
see: N. Guttenberger, W. Blankenfeldt R. Breinbauer,
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2017, 25, 6149.
[3] a) V. Udumula, J. L. Endres, C. N. Harper, L. Jaramillo,
H. A. Zhong, K. W. Bayles, M. Conda-Sheridan, Eur. J.
Med. Chem. 2017, 125, 710; b) A. T. Garrison, Y.
Abouelhassan, V. M. Norwood IV, D. Kallifidas, F. Bai,
4
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.