to the stereospecific formation of 1,2-trans glycosides and
as a result, 1,2-cis glycosides cannot be introduced at a final
stage of a chemoselective glycosylation sequence. To address
this problem, we have developed a strategy whereby the
anomeric reactivity of thioglycosides is controlled by the
bulkiness of the anomeric thio group.9 Although this ap-
proach widened the scope of chemoselective glycosylations,
it is still hampered by the fact that the nature of the C-2
protecting group overrides the controlling effect introduced
by leaving groups of different size. It is obvious that there
is a great need for deactivated (disarmed) thioglycosides that
can be used in chemoselective glycosylation and will give
1,2-cis glycosides.
We report here that trans-2,3-cyclic carbonates deactivate
the anomeric center of thioglycosides both electronically and
conformationally,5 and as a result, such derivatives are
significantly less reactive than corresponding thioglycosides
that have ester-protecting groups at C-2. Importantly, it was
anticipated that trans-2,3-cyclic carbonates cannot perform
neighboring group participation during glycosylations and,
therefore, under appropriate conditions should give R-gly-
cosides as the major product.10
N-iodosuccinimide (NIS) and trimethylsilyl trifluoromethane-
sulfonate (TMSOTf)12 mediated coupling of 3 with 4 gave
disaccharide 5 in a yield of 64%. MALDI-TOF analysis of
the crude reaction mixture indicated that no self-condensation
or oligomerization of 3 had occurred. Furthermore, only the
â-anomer was formed due to neighboring group participation
by the Lev ester at C-2 of 4. Additional experiments showed
that thioglycoside 3 remains intact upon treatment with the
following promoters of thioglycosides: NIS/TMSOTf, NIS/
AgOTf,12a MeOTf13 (in dichloromethane at room tempera-
ture). This finding prompted us to employ the highly
deactivated donors 6, 8, and 10, which can be activated with
these promoters. Indeed, coupling of the fully benzoylated
thioglucoside 6 with cyclic carbonate 3 in the presence of
NIS/TMSOTf afforded disaccharide 7 in 72% yield. In a
similar manner, disaccharide 9 was obtained in an excellent
yield of 81% using the fully benzoylated thiogalactoside 8.
In both reactions, complete chemoselectivity was achieved
and only â-glycosides were formed. Remarkably, the un-
reactive N-phthalimido derivative 10 was selectively acti-
vated by NIS/TMSOTf and reaction with 3 provided
disaccharide 11 in 47% yield (Scheme 2). The results of these
To explore the potential of trans-2,3-cyclic carbonates,
compound 3 was prepared and its glycosyl accepting property
was examined. Thus, treatment of thioglycoside 1 with
phosgene in the presence of triethylamine as an acid
scavenger gave 2 as crystalline material in a quantitative
yield. Regioselective opening of the benzylidene acetal using
sodium cyanoborohydride and hydrogen chloride in tetra-
hydrofuran provided the desired glycosyl acceptor 3 bearing
a free hydroxyl at C-4 (Scheme 1).11
Scheme 2a
Scheme 1a
a Key: (a) phosgene (1.9 M solution in toluene), Et3N, DCM,
100%; (b) NaCNBH3, HCl/Et2O, MS 3 Å, THF, 62%.
With thioglycoside 3 in hand, attention was focused on
chemoselective glycosylations. In first instance, the electroni-
cally deactivated thioglycoside 4 was chosen as the glycosyl
donor to investigate the relative reactivity of 3. As expected,
a Key: (a) NIS, TMSOTf, MS 4 Å, DCM, 0 °C; (b) NIS,
TMSOTf, MS 4 Å, DCM, rt.
glycosylations demonstrate that the anomeric reactivity of
thioglycoside 3 is much lower than that of acylated deriva-
tives.
In the next stage of the research, attention was turned to
the use of 2,3-carbonates as glycosyl donors for the synthesis
of R-glycosides and disaccharide 9 was chosen as the
(9) (a) Boons, G.-J.; Geurtsen, R.; Holmes, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995,
36, 6325. (b) Geurtsen, R.; Holmes, D. S.; Boons, G.-J. J. Org. Chem.
1997, 62, 8145.
(10) During the preparation of this manuscript, Kerns et al. reported the
use of oxazolidinone protected glucosamine derivatives for the synthesis
of R-linked 2-amino glycosides. Benakli, K.; Zha, C.; Kerns, R. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9461. For examples of using 2,3-cyclic carbonates
as glycosyl donors, see: (a) Gorin, P. A.; Perlin, A. S. Can. J. Chem. 1961,
39, 2474. (b) Betaneli, V. I.; Ovchinnikov, M. V.; Backinowsky, L. V.;
Kochetkov, N. K. Carbohydr. Res. 1980, 84, 211. (c) Kochetkov, N. K.;
Torgov, V. I.; Malysheva, N. N.; Shashkov, A. S. Tetrahedron 1980, 36,
1099. (d) Crich, D.; Cai, W.; Dai, Z. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 1291.
(11) Garegg, P. J.; Hultberg, H.; Wallin, S.; Carbohydr. Res. 1982, 108,
97.
(12) (a) Konradsson, P.; Udodong, U. E.; Fraser-Reid, B. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1990, 31, 4313. (b) Veeneman, G. H.; van Leeuwen, S. H.; van Boom.
J. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 1331.
(13) (a) Lo¨nn, H. Carbohydr. Res. 1985, 139, 105. (b) Lo¨nn, H.
Carbohydr. Res. 1985, 139, 115.
4202
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 26, 2001