addition to anisyl imine in the presence of the tosyl 2j or
ethoxycarbonyl imine 2k with an electron-withdrawing N-
substituent. One of the reasons for the chemoselectivity may be
due to the difference in the ability of the imino nitrogen to be
protonated by the catalyst. A better chemoselectivity between
the imines 2a and 2k was observed in the present case than that
in the previous report, showing that the present reaction
conditions are much milder than the previous ones.
In conclusion, we have developed a convenient imino aldol
reaction catalyzed by a cation-exchange resin. The present
reaction has the following several advantages. (1) The cation-
exchange resin was recovered by simple filtration without
discharging harmful waste water from the reaction medium and
it was used repeatedly without loss of activity. (2) The reaction
could be carried out in ethyl alcohol, which is a relatively safe
organic solvent. (3) High chemoselectivity was observed.
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and
Culture, Japan, and a grant from the Nagase Science and
Technology Foundation.
Notes and references
Scheme 1
† A typical experimental procedure is as follows: to a suspension of
Amberlyst® 15 DRY (4.3 mg, 0.02 mmol of the sulfonic acid portion,
washed with EtOH and dried in vacuo at 100 °C) and aldimine 2a (42.3 mg,
0.2 mmol) in EtOH (1.0 ml) was added a solution of ketene silyl acetal 1a
(45.2 mg, 0.24 mmol) in EtOH (1.0 ml) at room temperature under an argon
atmosphere. After being stirred at room temperature for 10.5 h, the
suspension was filtered through a Celite pad. The filtrate was concentrated
in vacuo to afford a crude oil. Purification on preparative silica gel TLC (n-
hexane–AcOEt = 10+1, as an eluent) gave the adduct 3aa (64.7 mg, 99%)
as a colorless oil.
Table 3 Reuse of Amberlyst® 15 DRYa
‡ The sulfonic acid groups on the recovered resin are involved in the salt
formation with amine moieties,8 and therefore, such salts may be also
responsible for the present imino aldol reaction. We are currently
investigating such salt formation in more detail.
Run
1st
98
2nd
93
3rd
97
4th
94
3aa (%)b
1 M. Shimizu and S. Itohara, Synlett, 2000, 1828.
a The reaction was carried out according to the typical experimental
procedure. b Isolated yield.
2 I. Ojima, S. Inaba and K. Yoshida, Tetrahedron Lett., 1977, 18, 3643; R.
A. Pilli and D. Russowsky, Chem. Commun., 1987, 1053; G. Guanti, E.
Narisano and L. Banfi, Tetrahedron Lett., 1987, 28, 4331; T. Mukaiyama,
K. Kashiwagi and S. Matsui, Chem. Lett., 1989, 1397; T. Mukaiyama, H.
Akamatsu and J. S. Han, Chem. Lett., 1990, 889; M. Onaka, R. Ohno, N.
Yanagiya and Y. Izumi, Synlett, 1993, 141; K. Ishihara, M. Miyata, K.
Hattori, T. Tada and H. Yamamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116,
10 520; S. Kobayashi, M. Araki, H. Ishitani, S. Nagayama and I. Hachiya,
Synlett, 1995, 233; M. Shimizu, K. Kume and T. Fujisawa, Chem. Lett.,
1996, 545; R. Hayakawa and M. Shimizu, Chem. Lett., 1999, 591.
3 S. Kobayashi, S. Nagayama and T. Busujima, Tetrahedron Lett., 1996,
37, 9221; L. Yu, D. Chen, J. Li and P. G. Wang, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62,
3575; S. Kobayashi and S. Nagayama, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120,
2985; N. Tanaka and Y. Masaki, Synlett, 2000, 406.
4 A. Akelah and D. C. Sherrington, Chem . Rev., 1981, 81, 557; S. J.
Shuttleworth, S. M. Allin and P. K. Sharma, Synthesis, 1997, 1217; B.
Baruah, M. P. Dutta, A. Boruah, D. Prajapati and J. S. Sandhu, Synlett,
1999, 409; J.-J. Young, L.-J. Jung and K.-M. Cheng, Tetrahedron Lett.,
2000, 41, 3415.
5 T.-P. Loh and L.-L. Wei, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 323; S. Kobayashi,
T. Busujima and S. Nagayama, Synlett, 1999, 545; T. Akiyama, J. Takaya
and H. Kagoshima, Synlett, 1999, 1045; K. Manabe, Y. Mori and S.
Kobayashi, Synlett, 1999, 1401; T. Akiyama, J. Takaya and H.
Kagoshima, Synlett, 1999, 1426; K. Manabe and S. Kobayashi, Org.
Lett., 1999, 1, 1965; T. Akiyama, J. Takaya and H. Kagoshima,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2001, 42, 4025.
6 D. D. Reynolds and B. C. Cossar, J. Heterocycl. Chem., 1971, 597.
7 Preferential activation of aldimine in the presence of aldehyde, see: H.
Nakamura, H. Iwama and Y. Yamamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118,
6641; S. Kobayashi and S. Nagayama, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 232; S.
Kobayashi and S. Nagayama, Synlett, 1997, 653; S. Kobayashi and S.
Nagayama, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 10 049; T. Akiyama and J.
Iwai, Synlett, 1998, 273.
8 Y.-S. Liu, C. Zhao, D. E. Bergbreiter and D. Romo, J. Org. Chem., 1998,
63, 3471.
Scheme 2
Chem. Commun., 2001, 2318–2319
2319