Angewandte
Chemie
also Table S2). We hypothesized that this product arose from
the use of diethyl maleate as a terminal electron acceptor by
E. coli for anaerobic respiration under the progressively
oxygen limiting conditions of the reaction setup. We also
verified that living cells were required for diethyl succinate
production. The formation of this by-product at a catalyst
loading of 2.5 mol% therefore confirms that the E. coli
bacteria are alive under our optimal reaction conditions.
Having shown that the FePcCl-catalyzed cyclopropana-
tion was compatible with E. coli, we next attempted the
reaction with styrene generated by bacterial metabolism.
Styrene production from d-glucose was achieved in the l-
phenylalanine-overproducing strain E. coli NST74 by intro-
ducing two enzymes: l-phenylalanine ammonia lyase from
Arabidopsis thaliana (PAL2), which converts l-phenylalanine
into trans-cinnamic acid, and a decarboxylase from Saccha-
romyces cerevisiae (FDC1) that generates styrene from trans-
cinnamic acid (Figure 3A).[10]
without reaction components showed no difference in sur-
vival (see Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). Together,
these results suggested that our reaction would be compatible
with in vivo styrene production. Accordingly, the PAL2 and
FDC1 genes were introduced into E. coli NST74 on a single
expression plasmid (pTrc99A_PAL2-FDC1). Under opti-
mized conditions, this strain accumulated 1.65 mm styrene in
the culture medium over 48 h (see Figure S5). We next
attempted the cyclopropanation reaction by adding FePcCl
(2.5 mol%) and EDA (2 equiv) to cultures at the point of
induction of the styrene-producing pathway (OD600 = 0.5–0.6,
t = 0 h). After 48 h we observed cyclopropane 1 by GC (44%
conversion, d.r. 3.0:1). 1H NMR spectroscopic analysis of the
reaction extract showed no unreacted EDA and significant
levels of EDA by-products, thus indicating that competing
carbene dimerization was probably limiting reaction conver-
sion. This issue was circumvented by adding EDA portionwise
over the course of the fermentation; in this way, the yield of
1 was increased to 81%. By adding an additional equivalent
of EDA and extending the reaction time to 60 h we obtained
1 in 95% yield (as determined by GC; Figure 3B).
We performed a series of control experiments to confirm
that cyclopropanation required the presence of the catalyst,
EDA, and living E. coli (Figure 3C). To obtain information
about the timing and rate of cyclopropanation
relative to in vivo styrene production, we analyzed
product distributions in fermentations with and
without the reaction components (Figure 3D; see
also Figure S4). In the presence of FePcCl and
EDA, styrene reached a maximum concentration
of 0.6 mm after 18 h and then steadily depleted as
1 accumulated. Ultimately, the concentration of
1 equaled the concentration of styrene produced in
the absence of the reaction components. This
observation confirms that the biocompatible cyclo-
propanation is interfaced with styrene output from
E. coli and that after 18 h the rate of styrene
consumption by cyclopropanation probably
exceeds that of styrene generation by metabolism.
This analysis also demonstrates that the reaction
components have a minimal effect on the overall
levels of styrene production. Interestingly, in the
absence of FePcCl, accumulating EDA signifi-
cantly inhibited styrene production after 12 h (P <
0.05), thus indicating that this reagent is toxic to
E. coli and that the activity of the catalyst prevents
this adverse effect in the full reaction (see Fig-
ure S5). A preliminary investigation of the cyclo-
propanation by using a three-phase test suggested
that catalysis by FePcCl occurs at a solid–liquid
We confirmed that FePcCl was effective under the
conditions required for styrene production by performing
the cyclopropanation reaction with 1.5 mm styrene in phos-
phate-limited minimal media (MM1) containing E. coli
BL21(DE3) and d-glucose (82% yield, d.r. 1.7:1). Serial
dilutions and plate counts directly from cultures with and
interface, as no product was detected when a poly-
mer-supported styrene was used (see Figure S6).
This result indicates that FePcCl is probably
functioning as a heterogeneous catalyst in this
transformation.
We evaluated the scope of the in vivo cyclo-
propanation by examining other diazoacetate
derivatives. Using additional electron-poor
(acceptor) carbenes afforded cyclopropanes 2–4,
Figure 3. The biocompatible cyclopropanation reaction can be interfaced with micro-
bial styrene production. A) Engineered pathway for styrene production in the l-
phenylalanine overproducer E. coli NST74. B) Cyclopropanation of metabolically
generated styrene. C) Graph showing that cyclopropane production requires all
reaction components and living E. coli. D) Metabolite production during fermenta-
tions. E) Additional cyclopropanes accessed by this approach. Metabolite concen-
trations were determined by GC relative to an internal standard of 1,3,5-trimethoxy-
benzene. Yields in (E) are for isolated material from 800 mL cultures. All data are
shown as an average of three independent experiments to one standard deviation.
[a] The product was isolated in 93% yield. [b] The reaction was carried out for 72 h.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 1 – 5
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
3
These are not the final page numbers!