Communications
Organometallics, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2002
3
Sch em e 2
iminoacyl) compound 6 was produced (Scheme 1).
Perhaps the clearest spectroscopic indications for 6
are the 13C NMR resonance at δ 252.19 assigned to
the η2-iminoacyl moieties and the relative integration
intensities for the methyl groups in this species.5
The intramolecular coupling between two η2-imino-
acyl groups to yield enediamido ligands has been
extensively studied by Rothwell et al. for bis(aryloxy)
bis(η2-iminoacyl) group 4 complexes.12 Coupling re-
actions have also been observed for group 4 tropo-
coronand-10 and calix[4]arene-supported complexes.13
A
recent theoretical treatment of this reaction has also
recently appeared.14 Compound 6 produces the enedi-
amido complex 7 upon mild thermolysis. The clearest
spectroscopic evidence for 7 is the appearance of a new
carbon signal at δ 112.0, which was assigned to the
CdC carbon centers.
Complex 7 was characterized by crystallographic
analysis.15 The Zr center exhibits a distorted pseudo-
octahedral geometry with substantial distortions due to
the limitations of the guanidinate bite angles (approx-
imately 58°). The enediamido group has a typical bite
angle of 82.96(15)°. The Zr-N(1) and Zr-N(2) bond
distances (2.090(4) and 2.108(4) Å) are consistent with
Zr amido linkages and are shorter than the average
Zr-Nguanidinate distance of 2.28 Å. The C(9)-C(11)
distance (1.358(6) Å) corresponds to a CdC bond, while
the N(1)-C(9) and N(2)-C(11) distances (1.427(6) and
1.415(6) Å) are consistent with single bonds between
sp2-hybridized C and N. As is commonly observed for
such species, there is a significant fold angle between
the N-Zr-N and N-CdC-N planes of 44.8°.12,13,16
We have shown that the bis(guanidinate) frame-
work offers a scaffold for interesting reactivity. We are
currently exploring the generality of these reactions
with isocyanates and related small molecules as well
as the further reactivity of 3 and 5 with various
unsaturated substrates.
bipyramid, with the imido ligand occupying an equa-
torial site. Structural and theoretical analysis of five-
coordinate Zr imido species along with the Zr-N bond
length of 1.863(3) Å and the linearity of the aryl imido
group (180.0(2)°) suggest that the Z-N(4) interaction
is best viewed as a triple bond.9f
The transformation of the η2-iminoacyl group of 2
to the terminal imido group of 3 is unique.10 The
formation of trans-2-benzylstyrene as the byproduct in
this reaction suggests a retro 2 + 2 cycloaddition from
an azametallacyclobutane as a route to this species. We
propose the formation of this metallacycle via the mech-
anism outlined in Scheme 2. First, 2 forms a metal-
laaziridine complex that undergoes a â-H elimination
reaction to yield a transient metal-hydride and a vinyl
amido ligand similar to an intermediate in the for-
mation of [(Ar′O)2Ta(dNAr′){N(Ar′)(CH2CH2Ph)}].11 An
insertion step could produce an azametallacyclobutane,
which can proceed to 3 by elimination of observed olefin.
The observation of only trans olefin requires stereo-
specific formation of the metallacycle and of the retro-
cycloaddition reaction. The closely related conversion
of an η2-imine complex, [Zr(tropocoronand){η2-Ar′NC-
(Bz)2}] (Ar′ ) 2,6-Me2C6H3), to yield a µ-imido species
apparently proceeds via elimination of a carbene group.10
Support for our proposal as well as evidence of
the generality of this reaction is provided by the
formation of the analogous imido species [{(Me2N)C-
(iPrN)2}2ZrdN(Me2C6H3)] (5) from the reaction of the
tetrasubstituted alkylguanidinate complex [{(Me2N)-
C(iPrN)2}2ZrMe2] (4)3 with CN(2,6-Me2C6H3), as de-
picted in Scheme 1. An equimolar reaction of these
reagents yields 5 over 1 day at room temperature.
Furthermore, as would be expected from our proposed
mechanism, propene evolution accompanied formation
of 5. The NMR spectra of 5 were similar to those of
1 with appropriate replacements, and the molecular
geometry of 5 is similar to that of 3.5
Ack n ow led gm en t. This work was supported by the
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of
Canada.
Su p p or tin g In for m a tion Ava ila ble: Text giving experi-
mental details for compounds 1-3 and 5-7, figures giving
thermal ellipsoid plots of compounds 1, 5, and 6, and tables of
crystal data and structure solution and refinement details,
atomic coordinates, bond lengths and angles, and anisotropic
thermal parameters for compounds 1, 3, and 7. This material
OM0108548
(12) Chamberlain, L. R.; Durfee, L. D.; Fanwick, P. E.; Kobriger, L.
M.; Latesky, S. L.; McMullen, A. K.; Steffey, B. D.; Rothwell, I. P.;
Folting, K.; Huffman, J . C. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 6068. Durfee,
L. D.; McMullen, A. K.; Rothwell, I. P. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110,
1463.
(13) Giannini, L.; Caselli, A.; Solari, E.; Floriani, C.; Chiesi-Villa,
A.; Rizzoli, C.; Re, N.; Sgamellotti, A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
9709.
Complex 4 also reacts with CN(2,6-Me2C6H3) in a
(14) Hardesty, J . H.; Albright, T. A.; Kahlal, S. Organometallics
2000, 19, 4159.
1:2 stoichiometric ratio. In this case the new bis(η2-
(15) Crystal data: empirical formula C38H64N8Zr, T ) 203(2) K, λ )
0.710 73 Å, space group P1h, a ) 10.9082(18) Å, b ) 111.226 76(18) Å,
c ) 18.699(3) Å, R ) 73.361(3)°, â ) 86.806(3)°, γ ) 61.590(3)°,
V ) 1921.0(5) Å3, Z ) 2, R indices (I > 2σ(I)) R1 ) 0.0520 and
wR2 ) 0.0815.
(16) Berg, F. J .; Peterson, J . L. Organometallics 1991, 10, 1599 and
references therein. Berg, F. J .; Peterson, J . L. Organometallics 1989,
8, 2461.
Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 3749. (j) Profilet, R. D.; Zambrano, C. H.;
Fanwick, P. E.; Nash, J . J .; Rothwell, I. P. Inorg. Chem. 1990, 29, 4362.
(k) Walsh, P. J .; Hollander, F. J .; Bergman, R. G. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1988, 110, 8729.
(10) Scott, M. J .; Lippard, S. J . Organometallics 1997, 16, 5857.
(11) Chamberlain, L. R.; Steffey, B. D.; Rothwell, I. P.; Huffman,
J . C. Polyhedron 1989, 8, 341.