reduce a number of acylsilanes with high enantioselectivity,8
reduction of 7 with (+)-DIP-Cl afforded the corresponding
alcohol in only 23% ee. Reduction with CBS catalyst
provided the alcohol of only 9% ee, but stoichiometric CBS
reduction was much more selective and gave 9 with 80%
ee.9 As shown in Table 1, a practical enantioselective
Scheme 1. Diastereoselectivity in Linderman’s Addition of
Nucleophiles to R-Silyl Mixed Acetals
Table 1. Noyori’s Transfer Hydrogenation of
Benzoyltrimethylsilane 7
invoking an (E)-oxocarbenium ion intermediate 4, which
adopts a well-defined conformation as the result of a
stereoelectronic preference analogous to the â-silyl effect.5
Linderman proposed that the R-silyl oxocarbenium ion adopts
a conformation that provides maximum overlap of σ C-Si
and π* CdO of the oxocarbenium ion.4 The nucleophile then
adds to the face opposite to the bulky silyl group, resulting
in the observed diastereoselectivity. Linderman’s mixed
acetals were prepared by alkylation of the racemic R-silyl
alcohols with R-chloro ethers, providing a narrow range of
ether products. Optically pure substrates were not investi-
gated. Linderman’s diastereoselective oxocarbenium ion
additions laid the groundwork for our investigation.
reaction
time (h)
yield
(%)
eea
entry
mol % 8
(%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
4
2
1
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.75
1.3
2.4
4.3
3.4
22
94
80
76
82
91
45b
95
96.5
96
95
98
95.6
a The ee’s were determined by HPLC analysis on a Chiracel OD-H
column. b The starting ketone 7 was recovered in 29% yield.
We hoped to access the optically active R-trimethylsilyl
benzyl alcohol6 by an enantioselective reduction of the
corresponding acyl silane. Following Olah’s procedure, free
radical bromination of commercially available benzyltrim-
ethylsilane 5, followed by treatment of the unpurified
dibromide 6 with silver acetate afforded the desired ben-
zoyltrimethylsilane 7 in multigram quantities (Scheme 2).7
reduction of 7 was achieved using Noyori’s asymmetric
transfer hydrogenation conditions with chiral Ru catalyst 8.10
The enantioselective reductions were carried out with 1
M solutions of benzoyltrimethylsilane in 2-propanol, and the
details are recorded in Table 1. Variation of the catalyst
loading provided the alcohol in good yields and high optical
purity (95-98% ee, entries 1-5). Optimal conditions utilized
0.5 mol % of the catalyst and provided the alcohol in 91%
yield and 98% ee (entry 5).11 A lower catalyst loading and
longer reaction time afforded the alcohol in good enanti-
oselectivity but poor yield, with significant recovery of the
starting ketone (entry 6). The absolute configuration was
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Benzoyltrimethylsilane 7
(8) (a) Buynak, J. D.; Strickland, J. B.; Lamb, G. W.; Khasnis, D.; Modi,
S.; Williams, D.; Zhang, H. M. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 7076-7083. (b)
Soderquist, J. A.; Anderson, C. L.; Miranda, E. I.; Rivera, I. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1990, 31, 4677-4680.
(9) Corey, E. J.; Bakshi, R. K.; Shibata, S.; Chen, C.-P.; Singh, V. K. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 7925-7926.
(10) (a) Matsumura, K.; Hashiguchi, S.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 8738-8739. (b) Haack, K.-J.; Hashiguchi, S.; Fujii,
A.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 285-
288. (c) Noyori, R.; Hashiguchi, S. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 97-102.
(11) Alcohol 9. To a 21 °C solution of benzoyltrimethylsilane (8.84 g,
49.6 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in 49.6 mL 2-propanol was added catalyst (S,S)-8
(149 mg, 0.25 mmol, 0.005 equiv). After stirring for 3.4 h at 21 °C, the
reaction mixture was filtered through a short plug of silica gel, which was
washed with Et2O (80 mL). Concentration in vacuo provided a crude oil
that was purified by flash column chromatography (2-5-10% diethyl ether/
With the requisite acyl silane in hand, several enantioselective
reductions were screened. While DIP-Cl was reported to
(5) For a review of the â-silyl effect, see: Lambert, J. B. Tetrahedron
1990, 46, 2677-2689.
(6) (a) Mosher, H. S.; Biernbaum, M. S. J. Org. Chem. 1971, 36, 3168-
3177. (b) Tsai, D. J. S.; Matteson, D. S. Organometallics 1983, 2, 236-
241. (c) Linderman, R. J.; Ghannam, A.; Badejo, I. J. Org. Chem. 1991,
56, 5213-5216. (d) Yamazaki, Y.; Kobayashi, H. Chem. Express 1993, 8,
97-100. (e) Takeda, K.; Ohnishi, Y.; Koizumi, T. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 237-
239. (f) Patrocinio, A. F.; Correa, I. R., Jr.; Moran, P. J. S. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 3133-3137. (g) Zani, P. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym.
2001, 11, 279-285.
hexanes) to afford the title alcohol (8.12 g, 91%) as a white solid: [R]23
D
-109.2 (c 1.00, CHCl3); mp 28-30 °C; IR (KBr) 3423, 2957, 1248, 998,
841 cm-1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.32-7.29 (m, 2 H), 7.20-7.17
(m, 3 H), 4.53 (s, 1 H), 1.67 (d, J ) 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 0.01 (s, 9 H); 13C NMR
(125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 144.2, 128.1, 125.8, 124.9, 70.6, -4.1; HRMS (EI)
m/z calcd for C10H15OSi (M - H)+ 179.0892, found 179.0888. Anal. Calcd
for C10H16OSi: C, 66.61; H, 8.94. Found: C, 66.89; H, 8.93.
(7) Olah, G. A.; Berrier, A. L.; Field, L. D.; Prakash, G. K. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 1349-1355.
148
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 1, 2002