L. A. Aronica et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 5813–5815
5815
2. (a) Rhone-Poulenc, DE, 1145161, 1963; C.A. EN, 59,
9900d, 1963; (b) Soda Aromatic Co. NL, 6502482, 1964;
C.A. EN, 64, 19497g, 1966; (c) L. Givaudan and Cie DE,
2851024, 1979; C.A. EN, 91, 107808a, 1979.
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Ph
Bu
Si
F
Bu
Si
F
Bu
Si
F
Ph
H
H
H
C
O
2a
C
O
Ph
C
O
H
(E)-1a
H
H
3
4
3. (a) Bremand, N.; Mangeney, P.; Normant, J. F. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2001, 42, 1883–1885; (b) Bremand, N.; Man-
geney, P.; Normant, J. F. Synlett 2000, 4, 532–534.
4. Barluega, J. J. Pure Appl. Chem. 1999, 71, 1385–1391.
5. Tanner, D.; Birgersson, C.; Gogoll, A. Tetrahedron 1994,
50, 9797–9824.
6. (a) Myers, A. G.; Yang, B. H.; Chen, H.; Gleason, J. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 9361–9362; (b) Myers, A.
G.; Yang, B. H.; Chen, H.; McKinstry, L.; Kopecky, D.
J.; Gleason, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 6496–
6511.
Scheme 4.
Br
Ph
Si Me
Me
BrCH2CH2CH2CH2
H
F
Ph
H
C
Si
C
O
1e
Me
Me
O
F
Br
H2O
Ph
H
Me
C
O
Si
OHC
Me
2e
7. Bull, S. D.; Davies, S. G.; Nicholson, R. L.; Sanganee,
H. J.; Smith, A. D. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11,
3475–3479.
F
Scheme 5.
8. (a) Anderson, J. C.; Flaherty, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 2000, 3025–3027; (b) Shepard, M. S.; Carreira,
E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2596–2605; (c)
Chenede´, A.; Abd.Rahamn, N.; Fleming, I. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1997, 38, 2381–2382; (d) Brasseur, D.; Marek, I.;
Normant, J. F. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 7235–7250; (e)
Kishi, N.; Maeda, T.; Mikami, K.; Nakai, T. Tetrahedron
1992, 48, 4087–4098; (f) Jefford, C. W.; Moulin, M. Helv.
Chim. Acta 1991, 74, 336–342; (g) Bachi, M. D.; Bosch,
E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 2581–2584; (h) Oda, H.;
Sato, M.; Morizawa, Y.; Oshima, K.; Nozaki, H. Tetra-
hedron 1985, 41, 3257–3268.
9. DePuy, C. H.; Bierbaum, V. M.; Flippin, L. A.;
Grabowski, J. J.; King, G. K.; Schmitt, R. J.; Sullivan, S.
A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 5012–5015.
10. Aronica, L. A.; Terreni, S.; Caporusso, A. M.; Salvadori,
P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 22, 4321–4329 and references
cited therein.
11. 2-Benzylhexanal 2a (representative procedure): 3 mmol of
Me2PhSiH, 3 mmol of 1-hexyne, 3 mL of toluene and
0.0022 g (3×10−3 mmol) of Rh4(CO)12 were put in a Pyrex
‘Schlenk’ tube, under CO atmosphere. This solution was
introduced in a 25 mL stainless steel autoclave fitted with
a Teflon inner crucible and a stirring bar, previously
placed under vacuum (0.1 mmHg), by a steel siphon. The
reactor was pressurised with 10 atm of carbon monoxide
and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24
h. After removal of excess CO (fume hood), the reaction
mixture was diluted with pentane, filtered (Celite) and
concentrated by bulb to bulb distillation (1 mmHg). The
residue was purified by column chromatography on silica
gel using pentane/EtOAc (95/5) as eluent, affording the
pure aldehyde10 (Z)-1a (85%). To a solution of 0.24 g (1
mmol) of (Z)-1a in 10 ml of DMSO, was added, at room
temperature, 1 ml of TBAF (1 M in THF). The reaction
mixture was hydrolysed with water, extracted with Et2O
and the organic layers were dried over Na2SO4. After
concentration under vacuum, the crude product was
purified by column chromatography on silica gel using
hexane/EtOAc (90/10) as eluent, affording the title com-
pound 2a (68%).3b
Finally, 1-benzylcyclopentancarbaldehyde 2e was
obtained when (Z)-2-(dimethylphenylsilylmethylene)-6-
bromohexanal (Z)-1e was reacted with tetra-
butylammonium fluoride (Scheme 5). In this case, after
addition of fluoride to silicon and subsequent phenyl
transposition to the alpha carbon atom, an intramolec-
ular attachment of the formed carbanion on the carbon
bearing bromine could occur. Hydrolysis of the CꢀSi
bond afforded 2e quantitatively, confirming the mecha-
nism proposed in Scheme 3.
In conclusion, this promoted fluoride regioselective
phenyl migration represents a direct methodology for
the preparation of 2-benzylaldehydes from b-silylalke-
nals (Z)-1. Considering that compounds (Z)-1 can be
easily generated by Rh-catalysed silylformylation of
1-alkynes with phenylsilanes,10 the above results open a
new route to the synthesis of 2-benzylaldehydes starting
from acetylenic substrates.11 The extension and optimi-
sation of this method to the preparation of a large
variety of aryl and heteroaryl aldehydes is in progress.
Acknowledgements
Financial support for this work was provided by the
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Universita’
e
della
Ricerca (MIUR).
References
1. (a) Boucley, C.; Cahiez, G.; Carini, S.; Cere`, V.; Comes-
Franchini, M.; Knochel, P.; Pollicino, S.; Ricci, A. J.
Organomet. Chem. 2001, 624, 223–228; (b) Roda, G.;
Riva, G.; Danieli, B. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10,
3939–3949; (c) Yang, H. W.; Romo, D. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 2877–2880; (d) Sola`, L.; Reddy, K. S.; Vidal-
Ferran, A.; Moyano, A.; Pericas, M. A.; Riera, A.;
Alvarez-Larena, A.; Pinella, J. F. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
7078–7082.