278 J. Z. HO AND M. P. BRAUN
N
N
Pd(OAc)2
P(Nap)3
P(Nap)3
rt, 16 h
O
O
Br
+
O
B(OH)2
OEt
OEt
NOT Formed
Suzuki Reaction, Scheme 1a
O
Pd(PPh3)4
N
N
THF
O
Zn
+
O
Br
4%
I
Negishi Reaction, Scheme 1b
N
Et4NCl DMF cat. amt. H2SO4
N
O
+
EtO
Sn (Bu)3
Water- Acetone
16%
PdCl2(PPh3)2
OEt
I
Stille Reaction, Scheme 1c
Scheme 1
Space considerations here do not permit a lengthy
discussion on all our failed attempts. Nevertheless, the
application of seemingly straightforward procedures
proved problematic. For example, (a) Suzuki coupling
between 3-pyridineboronic acid (or esters) and bro-
moacetate was fruitless (Scheme 1a)7a; (b) Negishi
coupling employing palladium catalysts between
3-iodopyridine and organozinc reagents derived from
ethyl 2-bromoacetate failed (Scheme 1b)7b; and (c)
Stille reaction between 3-iodopyridine and a stannyla-
cetylene afforded desired product, but the yield was
very disappointing, merely 16% (Scheme 1c).7c The
failure of these procedures forced us to search for an
alternative protocol. In 1975, Bruggink and McKillop8
reported a Cu(I)Br-mediated procedure for the coupling
of ethyl acetoacetate and an aryl iodide.
mixture of ethyl malonate potassium salt, 3-iodopyr-
idine, Cu(I)Br, MgCl2 and EtOH at 1008C for 4 h
afforded the desired ethyl 3-pyridineacetate in 88%
yield. It is important to choose ethyl malonate potas-
sium salt as the starting material since this will
undergo in situ deccaboxylation to form the acetate.
The role of MgCl2 is to facilitate the decarboxylation;
without it, longer reaction time would be needed and
the yield of the desired product would be lower. When
diethyl malonate is used, the product is diethyl
3-pyridinemalonate.9 With a reliable procedure in place
we probed the versatility of the procedure applying it to
a
range of iodopyridines to afford corresponding
pyridineacetates (Scheme 2). This study confirmed that
this method is robust because it works for both
electron-rich and poor iodopyridines.
It is interesting to note that although the Bruggink
and McKillop methodology was reported over 30 years
ago its utilization, as judged by citations, by the
synthetic chemistry community has been largely non-
existent, a fact that may be attributed to the lack of
understanding of its reaction mechanism compared to
its counterpart of Pd-catalyzed reactions. We consid-
ered the Bruggink and McKillop process to have a
number of merits, such as, the catalyst, Cu(I)Br, is
cheap and readily available, the protocol is straightfor-
ward and uncomplicated with no requirement for the
use of expensive ligands, and the reaction process
appears to be versatile with the capacity to afford
multigram quantities of products. This is in contrast to
the procedures outlined in Scheme 1. For the purpose
of further chemical manipulation it was important to us
that the product is an acetate, not a malonate, or an
acetoacete. With this in mind we attempted the
synthesis of 1 (Scheme 2) using a procedure similar to
that reported by Bruggink and McKillop. Stirring a
With this positive result in hand we conducted our
‘hot’ reactions (Scheme 3). By hydrolysis with 1 equiv.
of KOH, diethyl [2-14C]malonate was converted to ethyl
[
14C]malonate, potassium salt, and a crystalline com-
pound. Utilizing our modified protocol mentioned
above, ethyl 2-(pyridine-3-yl)[2-14C]acetate ([14C]1)
was obtained. Oxidation of [14C]1 to its N-oxide [14C]2
was carried out using H2O2 with MeReO3 (MTO) as a
catalyst.10
In an effort to develop new therapeutic agents for the
treatment of asthma, Merck has been engaged in the
study of phosphodiesterase-IV (PDE-IV) inhibitors.
PDE-IV is a high-affinity c-AMP-selective isozyme and
is found in all cell types that have been implicated in
asthma pathogenesis.11 Candidate 3 was identified as a
potent, selective PDE-IV inhibitor12 and a 14C-labeled
tracer was needed for drug metabolism studies. Thanks
to the effort of Merck process research, a 13-step
synthesis of 3 was developed, and the compound 4 is an
advanced intermediate from the 9th step of that very
Copyright # 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
J Label Compd Radiopharm 2007; 50: 277–280
DOI: 10.1002.jlcr