These data suggested the formation of phosphate triester 3
and an elimination product 4 (eq 3). An authentic sample of
while the second (δ ) -26 ppm) was assigned to 2A.
However, over several days 2A completely isomerized to
2B. This isomerization most likely proceeds via the phos-
phoranes shown in Scheme 1.
One is left wondering why the high effective molarity of
1 did not give a stable phosphorane, let alone why catechol
(eq 1) is even more effective than 1 in stabilizing a
phosphorane structure. The EM of g 1010 mol L-1 was for
the kinetics of a displacement reaction at a phosphorus center
(g14 kcal/mol in rate enhancement, eq 2).9 Although EM
values generally correlate between the kinetics and thermo-
dynamics of reactions, we find here a case where the
“kinetic” EM does not impart sufficient thermodynamic
stability to increase the concentration of a high energy
intermediate enough for its observation or isolation. This is
in contrast to catechol, which undoubtedly has a much lower
kinetic EM but imparts enough thermodynamic stability to
allow observation of the phosphorane at low temperature.
The displacement in eq 2 does not involve the intermediacy
of a phosphorane but instead a “phosphorane-like” transition
state and has entropy assisting the displacement. We postulate
that the reason ligand 1 does not act similarly in our study
compared to the Ramirez study is the fact that a six-
membered ring exists in 2A and 2B and a second is formed
in phosphoranes 2C-2E. In contrast, five-membered rings
are involved when catechol is the ligand. The angle strain
in phosphoester five-membered rings is partially relieved in
the phosphorane structures.4,11 We believe that this relief of
strain stabilizes the phosphorane depicted in eq 1, whereas
there is little difference in strain between the triesters and
phosphoranes depicted in Scheme 1. Therefore their relative
energies are not significantly perturbed from that of standard
triesters and phosphoranes.
phosphate triester 3 was prepared from methyl dichloro-
phosphate, and its NMR spectrum was identical to the
compound resulting from the addition of DBU and Meir-
wein’s salt.
Furthermore, on a preparative scale reaction, after allowing
1 and P(O)Cl3 in MeCN to stir with K2CO3 as the base at
-78 °C, followed by addition of Meirwein’s salt, a bright
yellow color was observed when the reaction temperature
rose above 0 °C, and phosphate triester 3 was isolated as
the product. A HRMS of the product mixture confirmed the
presence of quinone methide 4 as the elimination product
created in the formation of 3. Although the newly added
methyl group is on the phosphoryl oxygen, this does not
necessarily indicate that (CH3)3O+ underwent a reaction with
a phosphorane, since alkylation of the PdO bond of 2B could
lead to 3 and 4. Therefore, these results again provided no
direct evidence for the presence of a phosphorane.
Last, we analyzed a synthetic procedure that would initially
form 2A as a means to check whether 2B was a thermody-
namic sink. Reaction of PCl3 with 5 and then 1, followed
by oxidation with dimethyldioxirane,10 resulted in compound
6 (eq 4). The benzyl group could be easily removed in THF
at room temperature and 1 atm H2 with Pd/C in 10 min.
Acknowledgment. We gratefully acknowledge financial
support for this work from a NSF grant to E.V.A. and the
Welch Foundation.
Supporting Information Available: X-ray crystallo-
graphic data including experimental parameters and unit cell
packing diagram. This material is available free of charge
OL016941D
Analysis of 6 by 31P NMR spectroscopy after deprotection
revealed two resonances. The minor one corresponded to 2B,
(11) Westheimer, F. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1968, 1, 70. Kluger, R.; Taylor,
S. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6669. For a solvation viewpoint, see:
Dejeagere, A.; Karplus, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 5316.
(10) Chappell, M. D.; Halcomb, R. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 1.
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 2, 2002
203