Reactivity of Carbyne Complexes with Diazomethane
Organometallics, Vol. 21, No. 6, 2002 1183
washed with petroleum ether (2 × 5 mL) to give compound 1′
as an oily solid. The latter was redissolved in CH2Cl2 and was
then ready for further use.
CH2N2 (5 mL, ca. 3 mmol) was added to a dichloromethane
solution (12 mL) of compound 2 (0.01 g, 0.09 mmol) at -65
°C. The solution was stirred for 45 min and allowed to reach
room temperature slowly. Solvent was then removed under
vacuum, and the residue washed with toluene (5 × 5 mL),
extracted with CH2Cl2, and filtered. Removal of solvent from
the filtrate under vacuum gave a solid containing complex 5
as major species. Attempts to further purify this product were
unsuccessful. 1H NMR: δ 7.96 (s, 1H, CH), 7.94-7.01 (m, 20H,
Ph), 5.24 (s, 5H, Cp), 5.16 (s, 5H, Cp), 3.80 (s, 3H, OMe), 3.67
(br q, J HH = J HP = 13, 1H, PCH2), 3.64 (s, 3H, OMe), 3.33 [d,
J HH ) 4, 1H, µ-C(OMe)dCH2], 2.63 [dt, J HP ) 10, J HH ) 14,
1H, PCH2], 0.75 [d, J HH ) 4, 1H, µ-C(OMe)dCH2] ppm. 13C-
{1H} NMR: δ 253.6 [t, J CP ) 4, J CW ) 135, µ-C(OMe)tCH),
228.1 [d, J CP ) 8, WCO], 188.3 [t, J CP ) 4.5, µ-C(OMe)dCH2],
147.3 (s, µ-C(OMe)tCH), 143.0-129.0 (Ph), 98.7, 94.1 (2 × s,
2 x Cp), 77.0 [t, J CP ) 5, µ-C(OMe)dCH2], 61.8, 60.2 (2 × s,
2 × OMe), 23.4 [dd, J CP ) 29, 24, PCH2] ppm.
P r ep a r a tion of Solu tion s of Com p ou n d 2′. A diethyl
ether solution of CH2N2 (5 mL, ca. 3 mmol) was added to a
dichloromethane solution (8 mL) of compound 1′ (0.165 g, 0.09
mmol) at -65 °C. The mixture was stirred for 45 min, and
solvent was then removed under vacuum. The oily residue was
extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 5 mL) and filtered. Removal of
solvent from the filtrate under vacuum gave a residue contain-
ing compound 2′ as the major species present. Attempts to
further purify this product were unsuccessful due to its
progressive decomposition upon manipulation.
P r ep a r a tion of [Cu W2Cl(µ3-COMe)Cp 2(CO)2(µ-d p p m )]-
(BF 4) (3). A diethyl ether solution of CH2N2 (5 mL, ca. 3 mmol)
and 0.01 g (0.09 mmol) of CuCl were added to a dichlo-
romethane solution (15 mL) containing compound 1 (0.094 g,
0.09 mmol) at - 75 °C. The mixture was stirred for 45 min
and allowed to reach room temperature slowly. Solvent was
then removed under vacuum and the residue extracted with
CH2Cl2 (3 × 5 mL) and filtered. Removal of solvent from the
filtrate under vacuum yielded compound 3 as a brown micro-
crystalline powder (0.087 g, 83%). Anal. Calcd for C39BClCu-
F4H35O3P2W2: C, 40.10; H, 3.00. Found: C, 40.18; H, 3.05. 1H
NMR (200.13 MHz): δ 7.80-7.10 (m, 20H, Ph), 5.60 (s, 10H,
Cp), 5.17 (t, J HP ) 11, 2H, CH2), 4.91 (s, 3H, OCH3). 31P{1H}
NMR (238 K): δ 11.6 (d, J PP ) 44, J PW ) 400, 1P, µ-dppm),
6.1 (d, J PP ) 44, J PW ) 350, 1P, µ-dppm). 13C{1H} NMR (238
K): δ 332.7 (s, µ3-COMe), 247.8 (s, CO), 220.7 (s br, CO),
140.1-126.5 (Ph), 99.8 (s, Cp), 92.6 (s, Cp), 73.1 (s, OCH3),
48.9 (t, J CP ) 31, CH2).
X-r a y St r u ct u r e Det er m in a t ion for Com p ou n d
4‚1/2CH2Cl2. A selected crystal was set up on an automatic
diffractometer. Unit cell dimensions with estimated standard
deviations were obtained from least-squares refinements of the
setting angles of 25 well-centered reflections. Two standard
reflections were monitored periodically; they showed no change
during data collection. Corrections were made for Lorentz and
polarization effects. Empirical absorption correction (Difabs)37
was applied. An extinction correction was unnecessary.
Computations were performed by using the PC version of
CRYSTALS.38 Atomic form factors for neutral atoms were
taken from ref 39. Real and imaginary parts of anomalous
dispersion were taken into account. The structures were solved
by direct methods (SHELXS)40 and successive Fourier maps.
Hydrogen atoms could not be found on difference maps and
were not introduced in the calculations. Other atoms were
anisotropically refined. Full matrix least-squares refinements
were carried out by minimizing the function ∑w(|Fo| - |Fc|)2
where Fo and Fc are the observed and calculated structure
factors. Models reached convergence with R ) ∑(|Fo| - |Fc|)/∑
|Fo| and Rw ) [∑w(|Fo| - |Fc|)2/∑w(Fo)2]1/2 having values listed
in Table 2; each reflection was assigned a weight unity.
Criteria for a satisfactory complete analysis were the ratios
of rms shift to standard deviations being less than 0.2 and no
significant features in the last difference map. The asymmetric
unit contains a half molecule of CH2Cl2. Figure 1 represents
a CAMERON41 view of the cation, with the numbering scheme.
P r ep a r a tion of [W2(µ-COMe)Cp 2(CO)2(µ-d p p m )](BF 4)
(2). Solid PPh3 (0.020 g, 0.078 mmol) was added to a dichlo-
romethane solution (8 mL) of compound 3 (0.087 g, 0.075
mmol) at room temperature. The mixture was stirred for 10
min and the solvent removed under vacuum. The residue was
washed with toluene (5 × 5 mL), extracted with CH2Cl2, and
filtered. Removal of solvent from the filtrate under vacuum
yielded compound 3 as a dark brown powder (0.075 g, 83%).
P r epar ation of [W2(µ-CH2){µ-η1:η2-C(OMe)CH2}(CO)2Cp2-
(µ-d p p m )]BF 4 (4). A diethyl ether solution of CH2N2 (5 mL,
ca 3 mmol) was added to a tetrahydrofuran solution (12 mL)
of compound 2 (0.01 g, 0.09 mmol) cooled at 0 °C. The mixture
was stirred for 30 min, and solvent was then removed under
vacuum. The residue was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 5 mL)
and filtered. Removal of solvent from the filtrate under vacuum
gave a solid containing compound 4 as major product. Recrys-
tallization at room temperature from CH2Cl2/diethyl ether/
petroleum ether yielded compound 4 (0.053 g, 52%) as orange
crystals. Suitable crystals for the X-ray study were grown by
slow diffusion of a concentrated CH2Cl2 solution of a pure
sample of the complex into a layer of petroleum ether at room
temperature. Anal. Calcd for C41H39BF4O3P2W2: C, 44.92; H,
3.59. Found: C, 45.21; H, 3.70. 1H NMR (300.13 MHz): δ
7.62-6.98 (m, 20H, Ph), 5.86 (td, J HP ) 13, J HH ) 12, 1H,
PCH2), 5.12 (d, J HP ) 3, 5H, Cp), 4.95 (d, J HP ) 1.5, 5H, Cp),
4.44 (td, J HP ) 26, J HH ) 12, 1H, µ-CH2), 3.89 (dt, J HP ) 14,
11, J HH ) 11, 1H, PCH2), 3.85 [d, J HH ) 4, 1H, CdCH2], 3.70
(s, 3H, OMe), 3.02 (q, J HP ) J HH ) 12, 1H, µ-CH2), 2.36 [dd,
J HH ) 4, J HP ) 1, 1H, CdCH2] ppm. 13C{1H} NMR (50.32
MHz): δ 229.0 (d, J CP ) 7, CO), 218.0 (d, J CP ) 6, CO), 192.1
[d, J CP ) 9, µ-C(OMe)dCH2], 138.5-128.1 (Ph), 94.2 (s, Cp),
89.9 (t, J CP ) 8, µ-CH2), 88.4 (s, Cp), 68.1 [dd, J CP ) 9, 3,
µ-C(OMe)dCH2], 60.8 (s, OMe), 41.8 (dd, J CP ) 19, 23, PCH2)
ppm.
Ack n ow led gm en t. We thank the DGES of Spain
for financial support (Projects PB96-0317 and BQU2000-
0944). We also thank Estefan´ıa Llamas for the prepara-
tion of compound 1′, and Felipe Garc´ıa for experimental
assistance in the diazomethane reactions.
Su p p or tin g In for m a tion Ava ila ble: Tables of fractional
atomic coordinates, anisotropic thermal parameters, and bond
lengths and angles for compound 4. This material is available
OM010725R
(37) Walker, N.; Stuart, D. Acta Crystallogr., A 1983, 39, 158.
(38) Watkin, D. J .; Carruthers, J . R.; Betteridge, P. W. CRYSTALS,
An Advanced Crystallographic Computer Program; Chemical Crystal-
lography Laboratory: Oxford, U.K., 1988.
(39) International Tables for X-ray Crystallography; Kynoch Press:
Birmingham, U.K., 1974; Vol. IV.
(40) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXS 86, Program for Crystal Structure
Solution; University of Go¨ttingen: Go¨ttingen, 1986.
(41) Pearce, L. J .; Watkin, D. J . CAMERON; Chemical Crystal-
lography Laboratory: Oxford, U.K., 1989.
P r epa r a tion of [W2{µ-η1:η2-C(OMe)CH}{µ-η1:η2-C(OMe)-
CH2}Cp 2(CO)(µ-d p p m )]BF 4 (5). A diethyl ether solution of