Wittig sequence involving aldehyde 10 and ylide 11 was
envisioned for stereospecific elaboration of the dienoate array
in 8, while a Stille reaction6 with â-stannylenone 9 was
planned for fashioning the dienone perimeter. The syn-
relationship between the C(6) and C(7) stereocenters of 10
could potentially be controlled through an Evans asymmetric
aldol reaction7 between 12 and 13, while a face-selective
alkylation reaction between 15 and 16 could set the C(8)
stereocenter. We imagined deriving lactone 16 from the
known homoallylic alcohol 17, which would be available
from the Roush asymmetric crotylboration of 19 with (R,R)-
18.8
Scheme 3. Synthesis of Vinyl Iodide 26a
The synthesis of vinyl iodide 26 is shown in Scheme 3.
O-Benzylation of the anti-alcohol 17 with O-benzyl trichlo-
roacetimidate and catalytic TfOH9 procured the doubly
protected alkene 20, which was converted to the primary
alcohol by rhodium-catalyzed hydroboration10 and oxidation.
Further oxidation to acid 21 was accomplished with PDC in
DMF. Hydrogenation of acid 21 over a 20% Pd(OH)2 on
carbon catalyst effected a clean, but rather slow, deprotection
of the O-benzyl ether to permit in situ butyrolactonization.
The stereospecific C-alkylation of butyrolactone 16 was
achieved by low-temperature enolization with LDA and
addition of the allylic bromide 15.11 The total stereocontrol
observed in this reaction is attributable to the stereodirecting
influence of the C(25)-Me group (which hinders syn-
approach of the bulky electrophile to the enolate) and
preservation of the reaction temperature at -78 °C through-
out. In this regard, premature warming markedly lowered
the selectivity levels that could be attained. The configuration
of the newly induced stereocenter in 14 was verified by NOE
analysis. An OPMB for OTBDPS protecting group inter-
change was now effected to permit C(19)-C(24) side-chain
elaboration later on in the synthesis; this delivered the PMB-
ether 22.
a Reagents and conditions: (a) BnOC(NH)CCl3 (1 equiv), TfOH
(0.05 equiv), CH2Cl2 (0.4 M), rt, 3.5 h; (b) catecholborane (1.1
equiv), (Ph3P)3RhCl (0.05 equiv), THF (0.2 M), 0 °C for 5 min,
then rt for 14 h; 27.5% H2O2/MeOH/2N NaOH, 0 °C, 2 h; (c) PDC
(7 equiv), DMF (0.3 M), rt, 48 h; (d) H2, 20% Pd(OH)2/C, MeOH
(0.4 M), 3-7 d; (e) 16, LiN(Pr-i)2 (1.3 equiv), THF-HMPA (10:
1) (0.2 M), -78 °C, 1 h, then add 15 (1.2 equiv) in THF at -78
°C dropwise and stir at -78 °C for 2 h; (f) 40% aqueous HF/THF/
MeCN (1:2:1) (concentration of 14 ca. 0.09 M), rt, 24-27 h; (g)
PMBOC(NH)CCl3 (2 equiv), PPTS (0.5 equiv), CH2Cl2 (0.1 M),
rt, 7 h; (h) LiBH4 (10 equiv), THF/MeOH (100:1) (0.2 M), ∆, 3 h;
(i) 23, Imid (2.2 equiv), DMF (concentration of 23, ca. 0.1 M), 0
°C, add Et3SiCl (1.2 equiv) over 5 min, then stir at 0 °C for 1.5 h;
(j) 2,6-lutidine (20 equiv), CH2Cl2, -50 °C, add TBSOTf (3 equiv)
over 5 min, then stir for 0.5 h; (k) 2% aqueous HF, THF/MeCN
(1:1), rt, 1.5 h; (l) TPAP (0.05 equiv), NMO (2 equiv), CH2Cl2
(0.01 M), 4A MS, rt, 40 min; (m) 13 (4 equiv), (n-Bu)2BOTf (4
equiv), Et3N (4.2 equiv), CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 0.5 h, then cool to -78
°C, add 12 (1 equiv) in CH2Cl2, stir for 35 min, then warm to rt
for 1 h; (n) add Et3SiOTf (5 equiv) over 5 min to 25 in CH2Cl2
(0.02M), 2,6-lutidine (20 equiv), at -50 °C, then warm to rt for
45 min.
Having fulfilled its role in stereospecific attachment of
the C(8)-methallyl unit, the butyrolactone ring of 22 was
reductively ring-opened with lithium borohydride and diol
23 differentially O-silylated to obtain 24. Selective cleavage
of the primary OTES group now permitted oxidation to the
aldehyde 12 with TPAP/NMO.12 The Evans aldol addition
between 12 and 13 required the use of a significant excess
of the propionimide enolate (4 equiv) to drive the reaction
to completion, which made the purification of 25 exceedingly
difficult. The subsequent O-triethylsilylation reaction rem-
(6) (a) Stille, J. K.; Groh, B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 813. (b)
Farina, V.; Krishnamurthy, V.; Scott, W. J. Org. React. 1998, 50, 1.
(7) Evans, D. A.; Bartroli, J.; Shih, T. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103,
2127.
(8) Roush, W. R.; Palkowitz, A. D.; Ando, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990,
112, 6355.
(9) Wessel, H.-P.; Iverson, T.; Bundle, D. R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin. Trans.
1 1985, 2247.
edied this situation, allowing the protected aldol adduct 26
to be isolated pure by simple flash chromatography. Sig-
nificantly, no other aldol adducts were observed in the above
addition. The structure of 26 was verified by X-ray crystal-
lography.
(10) (a) Mannig, D.; Noth, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1985, 24,
878. (b) Evans, D. A.; Fu, G. C.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988,
110, 6917. (c) Evans, D. A.; Fu, G. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 2280.
(11) Bromide 15 was synthesized in 72% yield from (Z)-3-iodo-2-
methylpropen-1-ol (prepared according to Rayner, C. M.; Astles, P. C.;
Paquette, L. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 3926) after treatment with
Ph3P (1.5 equiv) and NBS (1.3 equiv) in CH2Cl2 (0.2 M) at 0 °C for 1.5 h.
(12) Ley, S. V.; Norman, J.; Griffith, W. P.; Marsden, S. P. Synthesis
1994, 639.
Attention now shifted toward stereospecific elaboration
of the two diene arrays present within 8 (Scheme 4).
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 6, 2002
899