Electrophilicity of Benzylidenemalononitriles
was used. The benzylidenemalononitriles 1b -c were pre-
pared according to literature procedures32 and recrystallized
from EtOH. Potassium or tetra-n-butylammonium salts of
carbanions 2b-f were prepared according to published pro-
cedures.33
cally determined concentrations of 1a . Though the two
methods give somewhat different results, it is obvious
that the cyclobutane is favored at low temperature,
whereas dissociation is preferred at higher temperature.
From a van’t Hoff plot, ∆rH° ) -39.2 kJ mol-1 and ∆rS°
) -130 J mol-1 K-1 (K from concentrations) can be
derived.
An Eyring plot for the reaction of 1a with 10 yields
∆Hq ) 19.8 kJ mol-1 and ∆Sq ) -214 J mol-1 K-1, in
agreement with Huisgen’s reports that stepwise [2 + 2]
cycloadditions via zwitterionic intermediates generally
proceed with highly negative entropies of activation.25
We can now use the Eyring parameters to calculate
the combination rate constant for 1a + 10 at 20 °C
(0.0124 M-1 s-1) and compare it with the value derived
from eq 1 (3.2 M-1 s-1). Though the two numbers differ
by a factor of 250, it is remarkable that eq 1 is even able
to predict the correct order of magnitude for stepwise [2
+ 2] cycloadditions. A better agreement cannot be
expected because of the Coulomb interactions in the
intermediate 1,4-dipole, which strongly depend on solvent
polarity.26
P r od u ct Stu d ies. Rea ction of 1a w ith 2b. Diethyl
malonate 2b (305 µL, 2.00 mmol) was added to a solution of
freshly sublimated tBuOK (225 mg, 2.00 mmol) in DMSO (1
mL) at room temperature. After 2 min of stirring, a solution
of 1a (154 mg, 1.00 mmol) in DMSO (1 mL) was added. After
10 min, trifluoroacetic acid (200 µL, 2.60 mmol) was added,
and the mixture was poured into water (50 mL). A white solid
precipitated, which was filtered, washed with water, and dried
in the air. The crude product was dissolved in 2 mL of
methanol and crystallized to give 280 mg (89%) of 2-(2,2-
dicyano-1-phenyl-ethyl)-malonic acid diethyl ester (4a b): mp
79-79.5 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.93 (t, J ) 7.1, 3 H, CH2CH3),
1.28 (t, J ) 7.1, 3 H, CH2CH3), 3.89 (dd, J ) 11.4 J ) 5.0, 1 H,
PhCH), 3.92 (q, J ) 7.1, 2 H, CH2CH3), 4.07 (d, J ) 11.4, 1 H,
CH(CN)2), 4.27 (q, J ) 7.1, 2 H, CH2CH3), 4.88 (d, J ) 5.0, 1
H, CH(CO2Et)2), 7.38 (s, 5 H, Ph); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 13.5
(CH3), 13.8 (CH3), 27.6 (CH(CN)2), 44.8 (PhCH), 53.4 (CH(CO2-
Et)2), 62.1 (CH2), 62.8 (CH2), 111.2 (CN), 111.2 (CN), 128.5 (Cm
Ph, tentatively), 129.1 (Co Ph, tentatively), 129.6 (Cp Ph), 133.4
(Ci Ph), 165.8 (CO2Et), 167.5 (CO2Et). Anal. Calcd for
C
17H18N2O4 (314.34): H 5.77 C 64.96 N 8.91. Found: H 5.78
We therefore conclude that the E parameters of the
benzylidenemalononitriles 1a -c derived in this work are
a useful tool for predicting the reactivities of these
electrophiles. It should be noted, however, that this
statement cannot be generalized for all types of Michael
acceptors. The relative reactivities of different nucleo-
philes toward tetracyanoethylene,27 for example, are not
properly reproduced by eq 1, probably because of desta-
bilization of the zwitterionic intermediates by the inverse
anomeric effect of two geminal cyano groups, which
strongly depends on the nature of the additional substit-
uents.28 Despite of this limitation, the results of this
investigation suggest to systematically analyze the po-
tential of eq 1 for predicting the rates of nucleophilic
additions to electron-deficient olefins.29 In view of the
previously reported relationship between eq 1 and Ritch-
ie’s N+ relationship4,30 and the finding by Hoz31 that the
rate constants for nucleophilic additions to acceptor-
substituted 9-methylenefluorenes correlate with Ritchie’s
N+ values, one may expect that many more types of
electrophile nucleophile combinations can be described
by the linear free energy relationship (eq 1).
C 65.15 N 8.98.
Rea ction of 1b w ith 2c. Ethyl cyanoacetate (340 mg, 3.00
mmol) was added to a vigorously stirred solution of freshly
sublimated tBuOK (337 mg, 3.00 mmol) in DMSO (1 mL).
After 1 min of stirring, a solution of 1b (184 mg, 1.00
mmol) in DMSO (2 mL) was added. After 15 min, trifluoro-
acetic acid (250 µL, 3.25 mmol) was added, and the mixture
was poured into water (100 mL). The product was extracted
with AcOEt (3 × 20 mL), and the organic layer was separated,
washed with brine, and dried with CaCl2. The solvent was
removed, and the crude product (a yellow oil, 500 mg) was
dried in vacuo. Crystallization from MeOH and recrystalliza-
tion from hexane/AcOEt yielded 100 mg (43%) of 2-cyano-3-
(4-methoxy-phenyl)-acrylic acid ethyl ester 5bc (the isolation
of the product was not quantitative): mp 80-81 °C (lit.34
82-83 °C). The 1H NMR spectrum was consistent with that
reported in ref 34.
Rea ction of 1c w ith 2c. Ethyl cyanoacetate (340 mg, 3.00
mmol) was added to a vigorously stirred suspension of K2CO3
(690 mg, 5.00 mmol) in DMSO (2 mL). After addition of 1c
(99 mg, 0.500 mmol) the mixture was stirred for 45 min at
room temperature and diluted with 20 mL of AcOEt and 10
mL of aqueous HCl (1 M). The organic layer was separated,
washed with water and brine, dried with Na2SO4, and purified
by column chromatography on silica gel 60 F254 (eluent hex-
ane/AcOEt). Recrystallization from hexane/AcOEt yielded 110
mg (90%) of 2-cyano-3-(4-(dimethylamino)-phenyl)acrylic acid
Exp er im en ta l Section
ethyl ester (5cc): mp 125-126 °C (lit.34 127-128 °C). The H
NMR spectrum of 5cc was consistent with that reported
in ref 34. The UV spectrum shows λmax ) 432 nm in DMSO at
20 °C.
Rea ction of 1b w ith 2e. Triethylamine (50 µL, 0.36 mmol)
was added to a solution of 1b (92 mg, 0.50 mmol) and acetyl
acetone (100 mg, 1 mmol) in DMSO (2 mL). The mixture was
stirred for 1h at room temperature and diluted with AcOEt
(20 mL) and aqueous HCl (5 mL, 1 M). The organic layer was
separated, washed with water and brine, dried with Na2SO4,
1
In str u m en ts a n d Ma ter ia ls. 1H and 13C NMR spectra
were recorded on 300 and 75.5 MHz instruments, respectively.
Chemical shifts are expressed in ppm and refer to Me4Si (δH
) 0.00 ppm), coupling constants are in Hz, and melting points
are uncorrected. The yields refer to isolated products without
optimization of the procedures. DMSO 99.5% (H2O < 0.01%)
(25) Steiner, G.; Huisgen, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1973, 14, 3769-3772.
(26) Steiner, G.; Huisgen, R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 5056-
5058.
(27) (a) Huisgen, R.; Steiner, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1973, 39, 3763-
3768. (b) Huisgen, R.; Schug, R.; Steiner, G. Angew. Chem. 1974, 86,
47-48; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1974, 13, 80. (c) Huisgen, R. Acc.
Chem. Res. 1977, 10, 199-206.
(32) Corson, B. B.; Stoughton, R. W. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1928, 50,
2825-2837.
(28) Beckhaus, H.-D.; Dogan, B.; Pakusch, J .; Verevkin, S.; Ru¨cha-
rdt, C. Chem. Ber. 1990, 123, 2153-2159.
(33) (a) Arnett, E. M.; Maroldo, S. G.; Schilling, S. L.; Harrelson, A.
J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 6759-6767. (b) Reetz, M. T.; Hu¨tte, S.;
Goddard, R. Eur. J . Org. Chem. 1999, 2475-2478. (c) Reetz, M. T.;
Hu¨tte, S.; Goddard, R. Z. Naturforsch. B 1995, 50, 415-422. (d) Reetz,
M. T.; Hu¨tte, S.; Goddard, R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9339-
9340.
(29) For an authoritative review, see: Bernasconi, C. F. Tetrahedron
1989, 45, 4017-4090.
(30) (a) Ritchie, C. D. Acc. Chem. Res. 1972, 5, 348-354. (b) Ritchie,
C. D. Can. J . Chem. 1986, 64, 2239-2250.
(31) Hoz, S.; Speizman, D. J . Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 2904-2910.
(34) Shen, Y.; Yang, B. Synth. Commun. 1989, 19, 3069-3075.
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 68, No. 18, 2003 6885