K. Hastedt, U. Panten / Biochemical Pharmacology 65 (2003) 599±602
601
146, CaCl2 2.6, MgCl2 1.2, HEPES 10 (titrated to pH 7.4
with KOH). The mean KATP-channel current during the last
minute of application of 0.3 mM ADP (control solution) or
0.3 mM ADP compound II (test solution) was measured
and used to express the KATP-channel activity in the presence
of compound II as percentage of channel activity in control
solution before and after application of compound II. The
single channel current amplitudes of the KATP-channels were
not changed by the applied concentrations of nucleotides and
compound II.
2.4. Treatment of results
Values are presented as mean Æ SEM. Relations
between drug concentration and speci®c binding or chan-
nel activity and calculation of Kd values were performed as
described [5]. Signi®cances were calculated by the two-
tailed U-test of Wilcoxon and of Mann and Whitney.
P < 0:05 was considered signi®cant.
3. Results and discussion
Competitive inhibition assays (Fig. 1B) revealed that
compounds I and II inhibited speci®c [3H]-glibenclamide
binding to SUR1 half-maximally at 89:6 Æ 5:7 mM (Hill
coefficientÀ1:11) and 1:63Æ0:07 mM (Hill coefficient
Fig. 2. Effect of compound II on KATP-channel activity in inside-out
patches of COS-1 cells transiently expressing SUR1 and KIR6.2. (A)
Current trace obtained from an inside-out patch. Free Mg2 (0.7 mM) was
always present in the solutions applied at the cytoplasmic membrane side.
The dotted line denotes the current level when all KATP-channels are closed
by 1 mM ATP (90 sec periods of ATP application 4 min before and 12 min
after the indicated current trace). The horizontal bars below the current
trace indicate application of intracellular solution containing 0.3 mM ADP
(with or without 0.03±1 mM compound II) by the bath. (B) Relationship
between normalised KATP-channel activity and concentration of compound
II in the presence of ADP. By use of the experimental design shown in (A),
KATP-channel activity was normalised to KATP-channel activity during the
control periods (presence of ADP, absence of drug) before and after
application of each drug concentration. Symbols are means (with SEM
shown when larger than symbols) from six experiments.
À1:06), respectively. From these IC values dissociation
50
constants (Kd) of 58:0 Æ 3:7 mM for compound
I
and 1:06 Æ 0:04 mM for compound II were calculated.
Compounds I and II inhibited speci®c [3H]-P1075
binding to SUR2A half-maximally at 148:7 Æ 2:9 mM
(Hill coefficient À0:82) and 7:01 Æ 0:54 mM (Hill
coefficient À0:87), respectively. These IC50 values corre-
sponded to Kd values of 139:6 Æ 2:7 mM for compound I
and 6:58 Æ 0:51 mM for compound II.
As shown in Fig. 2A, compound II applied at the
cytoplasmic membrane face rapidly inhibited KATP-chan-
nels of the SUR1/KIR6.2-type which is characteristic of b-
cells and many neurons. The periods of current recording
in the sole presence of 0.3 mM ADP revealed run-down of
channel activity. Inhibition by 0.03 or 1 mM of compound
II amounted to 9.5 or 83.5%, respectively (Fig. 2A).
Inhibition was rapidly and completely reversible. Analysis
of the dependence of channel inhibition on the concentra-
that the interaction of sulfonylureas and acidic analogues
with SURs is favoured by the anionic group of these drugs
[5].
The structure of compound II (Fig. 1A) differs from the
structure of the sulfonylurea analogue meglitinide only in
so far as the carboxylic group of meglitinide is replaced by
a phosphate group. The binding af®nity (1/Kd) for SUR1
and the KATP-channel-inhibitory potency (1/IC ) of com-
50
tion of compound II (Fig. 2B) yielded an IC value of
50
pound II were higher by 6.2 and 7.5-fold, respectively, than
the corresponding values for meglitinide [5,8]. Thus, as
compared with a carboxylic group a phosphate group
allows more ef®cient ligand interaction with SUR1. The
reason could be the greater negative charge of the phos-
phate group and/or the different position of the negative
charge relative to the neighbouring benzene ring of the
ligand.
0.16 mM (Hill coefficient À1:33). This IC value was
50
6.6-fold lower than the corresponding Kd value for binding
of compound II to SUR1. Similar differences (2±10-fold)
have been regularly observed for sulfonylureas and their
analogues [4,5,8]. These differences re¯ect the fact that
occupation of one of the four SUR binding sites per channel
complex is suf®cient for KATP-channel closure [11].
The ®nding that the Kd values for binding of compound
I were 21±55-fold higher than the Kd values for binding
of compound II strongly supports the previous conclusion
The binding af®nities of meglitinide for SUR1 and
SUR2A did not differ signi®cantly [5], in contrast to the
observation that the binding af®nity of compound II for