11 and phenethylamine 12 in refluxing toluene using a
Dean-Stark apparatus, followed by trapping the correspond-
ing imine with chloroacetyl chloride. Displacement of the
chloride with commercially available potassium O-ethyl
xanthate proceeded in excellent yield. However, when
xanthate 7 was exposed to the action of a stoichiometric
amount of lauroyl peroxide (added portionwise) in refluxing
1,2-dichloroethane, none of the desired tetracyclic derivative
10 was found. Instead, we isolated two isomeric lactams 14
and 15 in 62 and 20% yield, respectively (Scheme 3). When
Scheme 2
Scheme 3a
R-amino radical intermediate is ultimately reduced, affording
saturated γ-lactams. We have, in contrast, succeeded in
obtaining γ-lactams containing a diene system by starting
with trichloroacetenamides and generating the radical by
electron transfer from metallic nickel in combination with a
weak acid such as acetic acid.3
We have used this transformation as the key step in the
synthesis of γ-lycorane4 and 3-demethoxyerythratidinone.5
Oxidative termination of the radical sequence has recently
been accomplished using Mn(III)- and Cu(II)-based re-
agents.6
In the present study, it seemed to us that once the 5-endo-
trig closure takes place, the subsequent xanthate transfer from
the starting xanthate 7 to the stabilized, tertiary radical 9
would probably be unfavorable, and in any case quite
reversible. We hoped therefore that this would allow cy-
clization of radical 9 onto the aromatic system to give
ultimately compound 10 possessing the complete framework
of the erythrina alkaloids, many members of which exhibit
interesting biological activity (Scheme 2).7
a Conditions: (i) toluene, reflux, 3 h, then Et3N, chloroacetyl
chloride, CH2Cl2, rt; (ii) KSC(S)OEt, CH3CN, rt; (iii) lauroyl
peroxide, dichloroethane, reflux, 3 h.
the reaction mixture was heated for longer than 3 h, a more
polar compound became more and more visible. It was
identified as conjugated isomer 16, presumably the most
thermodynamically stable of the three isomers. By conduct-
ing the reaction in refluxing 2-propanol, lactam 16 was
rapidly produced and could be isolated in 78% yield. The
faster proton exchange in the more protic solvent allows the
isomerization process to occur within the addition time of
the peroxide.
The formation of unsaturated lactams 14-16 may occur
through direct oxidation by the peroxide of the intermediate,
ring-closed radical 9 into the cationic species 17, which then
loses a proton (Scheme 4). Compound 14 is kinetically the
most favored product, but it readily evolves into 15 and
ultimately 16 depending on the exact reaction conditions.
Alternatively, the formation of the olefinic bond may arise
from the disproportionation of the tertiary radical 9, upon
collision with another radical in the medium. Finally, if a
xanthate transfer did indeed take place, a xanthate such as
18 would be expected to be thermally labile with respect to
elimination of xanthic acid. Which of these processes is
actually operating or is the dominant pathway remains at
this point a matter of speculation.
The starting material for xanthate 7 was the corresponding
chloroacetenamide 13, prepared by heating cyclohexanone
1120. (k) Ikeda, M.; Hamada, M.; Yamashita, T.; Ikegami, F.; Sato, T.;
Ishibashi, H. Synlett 1998, 1246-1248. (l) Ikeda, M.; Hamada, M.;
Yamashita, T.; Matsui, K.; Sato, T.; Ishibashi, H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1999, 1949. (m) Ikeda, M.; Ohtani, S.; Sato, T.; Ishibashi, H.
Synthesis 1998, 1803-1806. (n) Ishibashi, H.; So, T. S.; Okochi, K.; Sato,
T.; Nakamura, N.; Nakatani, H.; Ikeda, M. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 95-
102. (o) El Bialy, S. A. A.; Ohtani, S.; Sato, T.; Ikeda, M. Heterocycles
2001, 54, 1021.
(3) (a) Quiclet-Sire, B.; Saunier, J.-B.; Zard, S. Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996,
37, 1397-1400. (b) Cassayre, J.; Quiclet-Sire, B.; Saunier, J.-B.; Zard, S.
Z. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 1029-1040. (c) Cassayre, J.; Dauge, D.; Zard,
S. Z. Synlett 2000, 471-474.
(4) Cassayre, J.; Zard, S. Z. Synlett 1999, 501-503.
(5) Cassayre, J.; Quiclet-Sire, B.; Saunier, J.-B.; Zard, S. Z. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1998, 39, 8995-8998.
(6) (a) Davies, D. T.; Kapur, N.; Parsons, A. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998,
39, 4397-4400; 1999, 40, 8615-8618; Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 3941-3949.
(c) Clark, A. J.; Dell, C. P.; Ellard, J. M.; Hunt, N. A.; McDonagh, J. P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 8619-8622. (d) Clark, A. J.; Filik, R. P.;
Haddleton, D. M.; Radigue, A.; Sanders, C. J.; Thomas, G. H.; Smith, M.
E. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 8954-8957. (e) Bryans, J. S.; Chessum, N. E.
A.; Parsons, A. F.; Ghelfi, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 2901-2904. (f)
Ishibashi, H.; Toyao, A.; Takeda, Y. Synlett 1999, 1468-1470. (g) Toyao,
A.; Chikaoka, S.; Takeda, Y.; Tamura, O.; Muraoka, O.; Tanabe, G.;
Ishibashi, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 1729-1732.
Although we could not accomplish the ring closure onto
the aromatic ring, the presence of the olefinic bond in the
product could be exploited in a more classical Friedel-Crafts
type approach to the erythrina framework.4,7 Moreover, by
(7) For a review of Erythrina alkaloids, see: Tsuda, Y.; Sano, T. In The
Alkaloids; Cordell, G. A., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, 1996; Vol.
48, pp 249-337.
1136
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 7, 2002