Please do not adjust margins
ChemComm
Page 4 of 4
COMMUNICATION
Journal Name
The protonated reactant (1a(H+)) is in equilibrium between
the O-protonated form SM-O and N-protonated form SM-N. C–
N bond cleavage of SM-N proceeds quickly, with a barrier of
16.1 kcal/mol. Because the next transition state of the Friedel-
Crafts cyclization, TS-FC1, has a higher energy barrier than the
reverse reaction of INT1 via TS-CN, the C–N bond cleavage
process for the monoprotonated form is reversible.20
Notes and references
DOI: 10.1039/D0CC01969K
1
S. Maurice. The isoquinoline alkaloids chemistry and
pharmacology. Elsevier, 1972.
2
(a) J. Wu, D. Talwar, S. Johnston, M. Yan and J. Xiao, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 6983–6987. (b) J. Dong, X. X. Shi, J.
J. Yan, J. Xing, Q. Zhang and S. Xiao, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2010,
6987–6992.
(a) C. Lucena-Serrano, A. Lucena-Serrano, A. Rivera, J. M.
López-Romero, M. Valpuesta and A. Díaz, Bioorg. Chem.,
2018, 80, 480–491. (b) M. Valpuesta, M. Ariza, A. Díaz and R.
Suau, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2010, 4393–4401. (c) S. V. Kini and
M. M. V. Ramana, Tetrahedron Lett., 2004, 45, 4171–4173.
M. Hanaoka, The Alkaloids: Chemistry and Pharmacology,
1988, 33, 141-230.
(a) H. Wang, X. Cheng, S. Kong, Z. Yang, H. Wang, Q. Huang, J.
Li, C. Chen and Y. Ma, Molecules, 2016, 21, 1–17. (b) B. E.
Maryanoff and H. R. Almond, J. Org. Chem., 1986, 51, 3295–
3302.
G. Blaskó, V. Elango, B. Şener, A. J. Freyer, M. Shamma, G.
Blaskó and B. Şener, J. Org. Chem., 1982, 47, 880–885.
Y. Gui and S.-K. Tian, Org. Lett., 2017, 19, 1554–1557.
Reviews on the use of Friedel-Crafts acylation for aromatic
ring functionalization, see: (a) E. Aguilar, R. Sanz, M. A.
Fernández-Rodríguez and P. García-García, Chem. Rev., 2016,
116, 8256–8311. (b) M. Hirai, N. Tanaka, M. Sakai and S.
Yamaguchi, Chem. Rev., 2019, 119, 8291–8331. (c) P. H.
Gore, Chem. Rev., 1955, 55, 229–281. (d) N. O. Calloway,
Chem. Rev., 1935, 17, 327–392.
3
The Friedel-Crafts cyclization and succeeding proton
transfer process forms INT3. The calculated monocationic
pathway via TS-FC1 has an energy barrier of 22.4 kcal/mol,
which is the highest barrier in the entire process. When
compared with the experimental results shown in Scheme 4,
the DFT-calculated energy barrier is overestimated by more
than 6 kcal/mol. This suggests that a monocationic pathway
does not suitably explain the rate of the Friedel-Crafts
cyclization. As previously seen in the NMR studies, the
carbamate substrate forms a stabilized dication. The open
dication INT1-Dication is expected to be more stable in free
energy than SM-O in the presence of excess TfOH. The reaction
rate of the Friedel-Crafts cyclization should therefore be
assumed from the energy barrier between INT-1-Dication and
TS-FC1-Dication, which is 10.8 kcal/mol. The barrier of the
dicationic pathway is consistent with the experimental reaction
rate. After the dicationic cyclization, deprotonation of INT2-
Dication immediately proceeds to afford monocationic INT3
because the dihydroanthracene moiety cannot be fully
protonated in TfOH.
4
5
6
7
8
9
(a)M. S. Shchepinov and V. A. Korshun, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2003, 32, 170–180. (b) V. Nair, S. Thomas, S. C. Mathew and
K. G. Abhilash, Tetrahedron, 2006, 62, 6731–6747.
10 (a) J. Stöckigt, A. P. Antonchick, F. Wu and H. Waldmann,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 8538–8564. (b) E. D. Cox
and J. M. Cook, Chem. Rev., 1995, 95, 1797–1842.
11 A. Yokoyama, T. Ohwada and K. Shudo, J. Org. Chem., 1999,
64, 611–617.
12 (a) H. Kurouchi, A. Sumita, Y. Otani and T. Ohwada, Chem.
Eur. J., 2014, 20, 8682–8690. (b) H. Kurouchi and T. Ohwada,
J. Org. Chem., 2020, 85, 876–901. (c) E. K. Raja, S. O. Nilsson
Lill and D. A. Klumpp, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 8141-8143.
13 G. A. Olah and D. A. Klumpp. Superelectrophiles and their
Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
14 (a)R. Huang, X. Zhang, J. Pan, J. Li, H. Shen, X. Ling and Y.
Xiong, Tetrahedron, 2015, 71, 1540–1546. (b) Y. Murakami,
M. Tani, K. Tanaka and Y. Yokoyama, Chem. Pharm. Bull.,
1988, 36, 2023–2035.
15 (a) P. A. Levene and C. C. Christman, J. Biol. Chem., 1938,
123, 83–85. (b) S. Rakhit and M. Gut, J. Org. Chem., 1968, 33,
1196–1201. (c) A. L. Gemal, J. L. Luche, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1980, 21, 3195–3198.
The rate-determining step of the entire process is the
activation of the carbamate moiety to form INT4, which has an
activation free energy from INT3 of 21.9 kcal/mol. This is in
good agreement with a previously reported monocationic
intramolecular hydrogen bond-activated C–O bond cleavage
mechanism.12a The cyclization process then proceeds smoothly
to afford the final product (PD).21
In conclusion, we investigated a new type of transformation
of
tetrahydroisoquinoline
to
functionalized
dihydroisoquinolone derivatives in the presence of TfOH. The
reaction is initiated by carbocation generation via C–N bond
cleavage of the tetrahydroisoquinoline, then diprotonation
prohibits the reverse reaction. The succeeding tandem reaction
then proceeds smoothly. The proposed concept of
diprotonative stabilization is expected to be applicable to the
generation of new types of carbocations from complex
molecules, such as isoquinoline alkaloids.
16 Y. Zou, D. D. Young, A. Cruz-Montanez and A. Deiters, Org.
Lett., 2008, 10, 4661–4664.
17 J. Shi, G. Manolikakes, C. H. Yeh, C. A. Guerrero, R. A. Shenvi,
H. Shigehisa and P. S. Baran, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133,
8014–8027.
18 E. V. Anslyn and D. A. Doughtery, Modern Physical Organic
Chemistry, University Science Books, 2006.
19 G. A. Olah, G. K. S. Prakash, G. Liang, P. W. Westerman, K.
Kunde, J. Chandrasekhar and P. V. R. Schleyer, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1980, 102, 4485–4492.
Some of the computations were performed at the Research
Center for Computational Science, Okazaki, Japan. This work
was supported by JSPS KAKENHI 18K14205. We are grateful to
Prof. Shuji Akai, Prof. Masayuki Inoue, Prof. Takeo Kawabata,
Prof. Tomohiko Ohwada, Dr. Mitsuaki Ohtani, and Dr. Kin-ichi
Tadano for helpful discussions.
20 The reversibility of C-N bond cleavage of similar compound,
tetrahydro-훽-carboline, in TFA is reported. Further
protonation on amino group on epimerization process is
discussed. see: M. L. Van Linn and J. M. Cook, J. Org. Chem.,
2010, 75, 3587–3599.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
21 The discussion about the mechanism is explained in details in
ESI.
4 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins